iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: will@kernel.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Split arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_nosync()
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 19:37:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <087400cdf15908066aa7813ecbdc57254529ad79.1565892337.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1565892337.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

Since we now use separate iommu_gather_ops for stage 1 and stage 2
contexts, we may as well divide up the monolithic callback into its
respective stage 1 and stage 2 parts.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 19126230c780..5b12e96d7878 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -490,46 +490,54 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context_s2(void *cookie)
 	arm_smmu_tlb_sync_global(smmu);
 }
 
-static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_nosync(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
-					  size_t granule, bool leaf, void *cookie)
+static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_s1(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
+				      size_t granule, bool leaf, void *cookie)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = cookie;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
 	struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
-	bool stage1 = cfg->cbar != CBAR_TYPE_S2_TRANS;
-	void __iomem *reg = ARM_SMMU_CB(smmu_domain->smmu, cfg->cbndx);
+	void __iomem *reg = ARM_SMMU_CB(smmu, cfg->cbndx);
 
-	if (smmu_domain->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK)
+	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK)
 		wmb();
 
-	if (stage1) {
-		reg += leaf ? ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_TLBIVAL : ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_TLBIVA;
+	reg += leaf ? ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_TLBIVAL : ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_TLBIVA;
 
-		if (cfg->fmt != ARM_SMMU_CTX_FMT_AARCH64) {
-			iova = (iova >> 12) << 12;
-			iova |= cfg->asid;
-			do {
-				writel_relaxed(iova, reg);
-				iova += granule;
-			} while (size -= granule);
-		} else {
-			iova >>= 12;
-			iova |= (u64)cfg->asid << 48;
-			do {
-				writeq_relaxed(iova, reg);
-				iova += granule >> 12;
-			} while (size -= granule);
-		}
-	} else {
-		reg += leaf ? ARM_SMMU_CB_S2_TLBIIPAS2L :
-			      ARM_SMMU_CB_S2_TLBIIPAS2;
-		iova >>= 12;
+	if (cfg->fmt != ARM_SMMU_CTX_FMT_AARCH64) {
+		iova = (iova >> 12) << 12;
+		iova |= cfg->asid;
 		do {
-			smmu_write_atomic_lq(iova, reg);
+			writel_relaxed(iova, reg);
+			iova += granule;
+		} while (size -= granule);
+	} else {
+		iova >>= 12;
+		iova |= (u64)cfg->asid << 48;
+		do {
+			writeq_relaxed(iova, reg);
 			iova += granule >> 12;
 		} while (size -= granule);
 	}
 }
 
+static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_s2(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
+				      size_t granule, bool leaf, void *cookie)
+{
+	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = cookie;
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+	void __iomem *reg = ARM_SMMU_CB(smmu, smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx);
+
+	if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK)
+		wmb();
+
+	reg += leaf ? ARM_SMMU_CB_S2_TLBIIPAS2L : ARM_SMMU_CB_S2_TLBIIPAS2;
+	iova >>= 12;
+	do {
+		smmu_write_atomic_lq(iova, reg);
+		iova += granule >> 12;
+	} while (size -= granule);
+}
+
 /*
  * On MMU-401 at least, the cost of firing off multiple TLBIVMIDs appears
  * almost negligible, but the benefit of getting the first one in as far ahead
@@ -550,13 +558,13 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_vmid_nosync(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
 
 static const struct iommu_gather_ops arm_smmu_s1_tlb_ops = {
 	.tlb_flush_all	= arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context_s1,
-	.tlb_add_flush	= arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_nosync,
+	.tlb_add_flush	= arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_s1,
 	.tlb_sync	= arm_smmu_tlb_sync_context,
 };
 
 static const struct iommu_gather_ops arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v2 = {
 	.tlb_flush_all	= arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context_s2,
-	.tlb_add_flush	= arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_nosync,
+	.tlb_add_flush	= arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_s2,
 	.tlb_sync	= arm_smmu_tlb_sync_context,
 };
 
-- 
2.21.0.dirty

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-15 18:37 [PATCH v2 00/17] Arm SMMU refactoring Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Mask TLBI address correctly Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] iommu/qcom: Mask TLBI addresses correctly Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert GR0 registers to bitfields Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert GR1 " Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert context bank " Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Rework cb_base handling Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Get rid of weird "atomic" write Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Abstract GR1 accesses Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Abstract context bank accesses Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Abstract GR0 accesses Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Rename arm-smmu-regs.h Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add implementation infrastructure Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Move Secure access quirk to implementation Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add configuration implementation hook Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add reset " Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add context init " Robin Murphy
2019-08-20 10:15   ` Vivek Gautam
2019-08-20 13:00     ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] Arm SMMU refactoring Will Deacon
2019-08-19 18:10   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-20  7:04     ` Will Deacon
2019-08-20  8:20 ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=087400cdf15908066aa7813ecbdc57254529ad79.1565892337.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).