From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0A2C3A5A1 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DBAF214DA for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:45:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5DBAF214DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1186243C7; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9435443C1 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:44:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C26CEC for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:44:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Aug 2019 18:44:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,442,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="380606108" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.136]) ([10.239.159.136]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Aug 2019 18:44:48 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix IOMMU field not populated on device hot re-plug To: Janusz Krzysztofik References: <20190822142922.31526-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> <29020717.Hl6jQjRASr@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> <8f505c10-6256-c561-1aea-b3817388c5b2@linux.intel.com> <3275480.HMaYE7B3nd@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: <0cf4e930-1132-1e7f-815b-57a08a1fe5de@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:43:31 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3275480.HMaYE7B3nd@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=c5=82_Wajdeczko?= , David Woodhouse , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi Janusz, On 8/28/19 10:17 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: >> We should avoid kernel panic when a intel_unmap() is called against >> a non-existent domain. > Does that mean you suggest to replace > BUG_ON(!domain); > with something like > if (WARN_ON(!domain)) > return; > and to not care of orphaned mappings left allocated? Is there a way to inform > users that their active DMA mappings are no longer valid and they shouldn't > call dma_unmap_*()? > >> But we shouldn't expect the IOMMU driver not >> cleaning up the domain info when a device remove notification comes and >> wait until all file descriptors being closed, right? > Shouldn't then the IOMMU driver take care of cleaning up resources still > allocated on device remove before it invalidates and forgets their pointers? > You are right. We need to wait until all allocated resources (iova and mappings) to be released. How about registering a callback for BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER, and removing the domain info when the driver detachment completes? > Thanks, > Janusz Best regards, Baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu