iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jim Yan <jimyan@baidu.com>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] iommu/vt-d: Add a quirk flag for scope mismatched devices
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 10:34:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12401c44-7e99-4aff-9014-d8eb8cb29a33@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1RGDVF1icaeEWMe0r0VA8AaxtHGJZ8NHCpvJfT8+1duOUYAQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 1/2/20 10:25 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
>> We saw more devices with the same mismatch quirk. So maintaining them in
>> a quirk table will make it more readable and maintainable.
> 
> I guess I disagree about the maintainable part, given that this patch
> already regresses Broadwell NTB.
> 
> I'm not even sure what the DMAR table says about NTB on my Skylake
> systems, exactly because the existing code means I did not have any
> problems.  But we might need to add device 201Ch too.
> 
> Maybe we don't need the mismatch check at all?  Your patch sets the
> quirk if any possibly mismatching device is present in the system, so
> we'll ignore any scope mismatch on a system with, say, the 8086:2020
> NVMe host in it.  So could we just drop the check completely and not
> have a quirk to disable the check?

Fair enough. Instead of no check, how about putting a pr_info() there
and give end user a chance to know this?

Best regards,
-baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-02  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-02  0:18 [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: patches for v5.6 Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 01/22] iommu/vt-d: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable scalable mode Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 02/22] iommu/vt-d: Fix CPU and IOMMU SVM feature matching checks Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 03/22] iommu/vt-d: Match CPU and IOMMU paging mode Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 04/22] iommu/vt-d: Reject SVM bind for failed capability check Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 05/22] iommu/vt-d: Avoid duplicated code for PASID setup Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 06/22] iommu/vt-d: Fix off-by-one in PASID allocation Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 07/22] iommu/vt-d: Replace Intel specific PASID allocator with IOASID Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 08/22] iommu/vt-d: Avoid sending invalid page response Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 09/22] iommu/vt-d: Misc macro clean up for SVM Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 10/22] iommu/vt-d: trace: Extend map_sg trace event Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 11/22] iommu/vt-d: Avoid iova flush queue in strict mode Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 12/22] iommu/vt-d: Loose requirement for flush queue initializaton Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 13/22] iommu/vt-d: Identify domains using first level page table Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 14/22] iommu/vt-d: Add set domain DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING attr Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 15/22] iommu/vt-d: Add PASID_FLAG_FL5LP for first-level pasid setup Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 16/22] iommu/vt-d: Setup pasid entries for iova over first level Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 17/22] iommu/vt-d: Flush PASID-based iotlb " Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 18/22] iommu/vt-d: Make first level IOVA canonical Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 19/22] iommu/vt-d: Update first level super page capability Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 20/22] iommu/vt-d: Use iova over first level Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 21/22] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Add support to show page table internals Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  0:18 ` [PATCH 22/22] iommu/vt-d: Add a quirk flag for scope mismatched devices Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  2:11   ` Roland Dreier via iommu
2020-01-02  2:14     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-02  2:25       ` Roland Dreier via iommu
2020-01-02  2:34         ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2020-01-03  0:32         ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-04 16:52           ` Roland Dreier via iommu
2020-01-05  3:43             ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-06 17:05         ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-01-07  0:35           ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-07  1:30             ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-01-07  1:47               ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-09  0:12                 ` Roland Dreier via iommu
2020-01-08 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-08 23:28     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-09  7:06       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09  8:53         ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-09  8:56           ` 答复: " Jim,Yan
2020-01-07 13:06 ` [PULL REQUEST] iommu/vt-d: patches for v5.6 Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12401c44-7e99-4aff-9014-d8eb8cb29a33@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jimyan@baidu.com \
    --cc=roland@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).