From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
cui.zhang@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
chao.hao@mediatek.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/mediatek: Use writel for TLB range invalidation
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:51:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1571104296.19130.67.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014211113.jq5qwe5pfonyocr3@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 22:11 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 02:23:47PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 17:29 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:19:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > Use writel for the register F_MMU_INV_RANGE which is for triggering the
> > > > HW work. We expect all the setting(iova_start/iova_end...) have already
> > > > been finished before F_MMU_INV_RANGE.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anan.Sun <anan.sun@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > This is a improvement rather than fixing a issue.
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 +--
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > > > index 24a13a6..607f92c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > > > @@ -187,8 +187,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> > > > writel_relaxed(iova, data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_START_A);
> > > > writel_relaxed(iova + size - 1,
> > > > data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_END_A);
> > > > - writel_relaxed(F_MMU_INV_RANGE,
> > > > - data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE);
> > > > + writel(F_MMU_INV_RANGE, data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE);
> > >
> > > I don't understand this change.
> > >
> > > Why is it an "improvement" and which accesses are you ordering with the
> > > writel?
> >
> > The register(F_MMU_INV_RANGE) will trigger HW to begin flush range. HW
> > expect the other register iova_start/end/flush_type always is ready
> > before trigger. thus I'd like use writel to guarantee the previous
> > register has been finished.
>
> Given that these are all MMIO writes to the same device, then
> writel_relaxed() should give you the ordering you need. If you look at
> memory_barriers.txt, it says:
>
> | they [readX_relaxed() and writeX_relaxed()] are still guaranteed to
> | be ordered with respect to other accesses from the same CPU thread
> | to the same peripheral when operating on __iomem pointers mapped
> | with the default I/O attributes.
Thanks for this info. See it now. then I will delete this patch in next
version.
>
> > I didn't see the writel_relaxed cause some error in practice, we only
> > think writel is necessary here in theory. so call it "improvement".
>
> Ok, but I don't think it's needed in this case.
>
> Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 13:19 [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu/mediatek: Correct the flush_iotlb_all callback Yong Wu
2019-10-09 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu/mediatek: Move the tlb_sync into tlb_flush Yong Wu
2019-10-09 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/mediatek: Use writel for TLB range invalidation Yong Wu
2019-10-11 16:29 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-12 6:23 ` Yong Wu
2019-10-14 21:11 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-15 1:51 ` Yong Wu [this message]
2019-10-09 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/mediatek: Reduce the tlb flush timeout value Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1571104296.19130.67.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
--cc=chao.hao@mediatek.com \
--cc=cui.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@google.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).