From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17817ECE58C for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94DC21925 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:25:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E94DC21925 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FF7CCE; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BB9CC3 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:25:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com (unknown [1.203.163.78]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6865D3 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:25:47 +0000 (UTC) X-UUID: f6e622fa625d41909af3235d2d7e170c-20191015 X-UUID: f6e622fa625d41909af3235d2d7e170c-20191015 Received: from mtkcas35.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.253)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 2005909881; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:25:41 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by MTKMBS31N1.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:25:39 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:25:39 +0800 Message-ID: <1571117141.19130.82.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] iommu/mediatek: Use writel for TLB range invalidation From: Yong Wu To: Robin Murphy Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:25:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1571035101-4213-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1571035101-4213-7-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: F7B169CFC27DA96FE703EAD572803384264DF78C3B40C94DC763E2363F6E10A82000:8 X-MTK: N Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com, Nicolas Boichat , cui.zhang@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, edison.hsieh@mediatek.com, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green , chao.hao@mediatek.com, Tomasz Figa , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 15:04 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 14/10/2019 07:38, Yong Wu wrote: > > Use writel for the register F_MMU_INV_RANGE which is for triggering the > > HW work. We expect all the setting(iova_start/iova_end...) have already > > been finished before F_MMU_INV_RANGE. > > For Arm CPUs, these registers should be mapped as Device memory, > therefore the same-peripheral rule should implicitly enforce that the > accesses are made in program order, hence you're unlikely to have seen a > problem in reality. However, the logical reasoning for the change seems > valid in general, so I'd argue that it's still worth making if only for > the sake of good practice: > > Acked-by: Robin Murphy Thanks very much for the view. If this patch is not so necessary, I will remove it this time. > > > Signed-off-by: Anan.Sun > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > > --- > > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > index dbbacc3..d285457 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c > > @@ -187,8 +187,7 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_range_sync(unsigned long iova, size_t size, > > writel_relaxed(iova, data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_START_A); > > writel_relaxed(iova + size - 1, > > data->base + REG_MMU_INVLD_END_A); > > - writel_relaxed(F_MMU_INV_RANGE, > > - data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE); > > + writel(F_MMU_INV_RANGE, data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE); > > > > /* tlb sync */ > > ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(data->base + REG_MMU_CPE_DONE, > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu