iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: maoguang.meng@mediatek.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	youlin.pei@mediatek.com, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	cui.zhang@mediatek.com, houlong.wei@mediatek.com,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
	sj.huang@mediatek.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	anan.sun@mediatek.com,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	chao.hao@mediatek.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 14:59:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1583477982.4784.37.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMq1KAOHFF43708ktvhEU6EYZv_s7Wp+kUwFD7h0bwVrQpyqw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 13:14 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:38 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > MediaTek IOMMU don't have its power-domain. all the consumer connect
> > with smi-larb, then connect with smi-common.
> >
> >         M4U
> >          |
> >     smi-common
> >          |
> >   -------------
> >   |         |    ...
> >   |         |
> > larb1     larb2
> >   |         |
> > vdec       venc
> >
> > When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power which
> > also need enable the smi-common's power firstly.
> >
> > Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and the
> > smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi-common.
> >
> > This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs.
> >
> > When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid calling
> > pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid two
> > issues:
> > 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the beggining,
> > all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks for
> > display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and clk_disable
> > called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The clock
> > operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the display
> > HW will be abnormal.
> >
> > 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip
> > pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock.
> >
> > Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then
> > device_link_removed should be added explicitly.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2019-July/
> > 021500.html
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/
> >
> > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index b138b94..2511b3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -450,6 +450,9 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> >         struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> >         struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> >         struct iommu_group *group;
> > +       struct device_link *link;
> > +       struct device *larbdev;
> > +       unsigned int larbid;
> >
> >         if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
> >                 return -ENODEV; /* Not a iommu client device */
> > @@ -461,6 +464,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> >         if (IS_ERR(group))
> >                 return PTR_ERR(group);
> >
> > +       /* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */
> > +       larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);
> 
> I'll mirror the comment I made on gerrit
> (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1361013):
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but for example, on MT8173,
> vcodec_enc: vcodec@18002000 needs to use both larb3 and larb5, isn't
> the code below just adding a link for larb3?

Yes. It only add larb3 here.

> 
> Do we need to iterate over all fwspecs->ids to figure out which larbs
> we need to add links to each of them?

We have checked this venc issue. Currently I have requested our venc guy
to seperate larb3-venc and larb5-venc in the driver[1] since they are
independent HW actually. I will put it into this series when I send next
version.

If there is some reasonable driver which have two larbs in it, then the
iterating is really necessary, But I don't see it right now. Only using
fwspec->ids[0] is enough for now.

[1]
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1958322

> 
> > +       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> > +       link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev,
> > +                              DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> > +       if (!link)
> > +               dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev));
> > +
> >         iommu_group_put(group);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -469,6 +480,8 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> >         struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> > +       struct device *larbdev;
> > +       unsigned int larbid;
> >
> >         if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
> >                 return;
> > @@ -476,6 +489,10 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> >         data = fwspec->iommu_priv;
> >         iommu_device_unlink(&data->iommu, dev);
> >
> > +       larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);
> > +       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> > +       device_link_remove(dev, larbdev);
> > +
> >         iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
> >         iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > index 2034d72..a7f22a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > @@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> >         struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> >         struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> >         struct iommu_group *group;
> > -       int err;
> > +       struct device_link *link;
> > +       struct device *larbdev;
> > +       int err, larbid;
> >
> >         of_for_each_phandle(&it, err, dev->of_node, "iommus",
> >                         "#iommu-cells", 0) {
> > @@ -466,6 +468,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> >                 return err;
> >         }
> >
> > +       /* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */
> > +       larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]);
> > +       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> > +       link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev,
> > +                              DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> > +       if (!link)
> > +               dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev));
> > +
> >         return iommu_device_link(&data->iommu, dev);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -473,6 +483,8 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> >         struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
> > +       struct device *larbdev;
> > +       unsigned int larbid;
> >
> >         if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
> >                 return;
> > @@ -480,6 +492,10 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> >         data = fwspec->iommu_priv;
> >         iommu_device_unlink(&data->iommu, dev);
> >
> > +       larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]);
> > +       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
> > +       device_link_remove(dev, larbdev);
> > +
> >         iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
> >         iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
> >  }
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03  9:37 [PATCH v3 00/14] Clean up "mediatek,larb" after adding device_link Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] dt-binding: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for multimedia HW Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] iommu/mediatek: Add probe_defer for smi-larb Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices Yong Wu
2020-03-05  5:14   ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-06  6:59     ` Yong Wu [this message]
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between smi-larb and smi-common Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] media: mtk-jpeg: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] media: mtk-mdp: " Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] media: mtk-vcodec: " Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] drm/mediatek: " Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] memory: mtk-smi: " Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] iommu/mediatek: Use builtin_platform_driver Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] memory: mtk-smi: Use device_is_bound to check if smi-common is ready Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] drm/mediatek: Add pm runtime support for ovl and rdma Yong Wu
2019-09-16  7:55   ` CK Hu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for MM nodes Yong Wu
2019-09-03  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] arm64: " Yong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1583477982.4784.37.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chao.hao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=cui.zhang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=houlong.wei@mediatek.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maoguang.meng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@google.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).