From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E5FC432C1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD010217F4 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:54:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AD010217F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656D1B9E; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D899CA for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16890102 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 06:54:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2019 23:54:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,547,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="201155117" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.136]) ([10.239.159.136]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2019 23:54:23 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Add first level page table interfaces To: Peter Xu , "Tian, Kevin" References: <20190923122454.9888-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190923122454.9888-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190923203102.GB21816@araj-mobl1.jf.intel.com> <9cfe6042-f0fb-ea5e-e134-f6f5bb9eb7b0@linux.intel.com> <20190925043050.GK28074@xz-x1> <20190925052402.GM28074@xz-x1> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: <1713f03c-4d47-34ad-f36d-882645c36389@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:52:26 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190925052402.GM28074@xz-x1> Content-Language: en-US Cc: Alex Williamson , Yi Sun , "Raj, Ashok" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Kumar, Sanjay K" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Sun, Yi Y" , David Woodhouse X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi Peter and Kevin, On 9/25/19 1:24 PM, Peter Xu wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:38:31AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: >>> From: Peter Xu [mailto:peterx@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:31 PM >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 09:38:53AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>>>>> intel_mmmap_range(domain, addr, end, phys_addr, prot) >>>>> >>>>> Maybe think of a different name..? mmmap seems a bit weird :-) >>>> >>>> Yes. I don't like it either. I've thought about it and haven't >>>> figured out a satisfied one. Do you have any suggestions? >>> >>> How about at least split the word using "_"? Like "mm_map", then >>> apply it to all the "mmm*" prefixes. Otherwise it'll be easily >>> misread as mmap() which is totally irrelevant to this... >>> >> >> what is the point of keeping 'mm' here? replace it with 'iommu'? > > I'm not sure of what Baolu thought, but to me "mm" makes sense itself > to identify this from real IOMMU page tables (because IIUC these will > be MMU page tables). We can come up with better names, but IMHO > "iommu" can be a bit misleading to let people refer to the 2nd level > page table. "mm" represents a CPU (first level) page table; vs. "io" represents an IOMMU (second level) page table. Best regards, Baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu