From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/17] iommu: Add for_each_group_device()
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 01:42:00 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2-v5-1b99ae392328+44574-iommu_err_unwind_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v5-1b99ae392328+44574-iommu_err_unwind_jgg@nvidia.com>
Convenience macro to iterate over every struct group_device in the group.
Replace all open coded list_for_each_entry's with this macro.
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
.clang-format | 1 +
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 16 ++++++++++------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.clang-format b/.clang-format
index 0d1ed87767337e..0bbb1991defead 100644
--- a/.clang-format
+++ b/.clang-format
@@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ ForEachMacros:
- 'for_each_free_mem_range'
- 'for_each_free_mem_range_reverse'
- 'for_each_func_rsrc'
+ - 'for_each_group_device'
- 'for_each_group_evsel'
- 'for_each_group_member'
- 'for_each_hstate'
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index f2c0c10af32c4c..b315cba0d4ed0f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ struct group_device {
char *name;
};
+/* Iterate over each struct group_device in a struct iommu_group */
+#define for_each_group_device(group, pos) \
+ list_for_each_entry(pos, &(group)->devices, list)
+
struct iommu_group_attribute {
struct attribute attr;
ssize_t (*show)(struct iommu_group *group, char *buf);
@@ -468,7 +472,7 @@ __iommu_group_remove_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
struct group_device *device;
lockdep_assert_held(&group->mutex);
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ for_each_group_device(group, device) {
if (device->dev == dev) {
list_del(&device->list);
return device;
@@ -707,7 +711,7 @@ int iommu_get_group_resv_regions(struct iommu_group *group,
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ for_each_group_device(group, device) {
struct list_head dev_resv_regions;
/*
@@ -1131,7 +1135,7 @@ static int __iommu_group_for_each_dev(struct iommu_group *group, void *data,
struct group_device *device;
int ret = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ for_each_group_device(group, device) {
ret = fn(device->dev, data);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -1935,7 +1939,7 @@ bool iommu_group_has_isolated_msi(struct iommu_group *group)
bool ret = true;
mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
- list_for_each_entry(group_dev, &group->devices, list)
+ for_each_group_device(group, group_dev)
ret &= msi_device_has_isolated_msi(group_dev->dev);
mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
return ret;
@@ -3242,7 +3246,7 @@ static int __iommu_set_group_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
struct group_device *device;
int ret = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ for_each_group_device(group, device) {
ret = domain->ops->set_dev_pasid(domain, device->dev, pasid);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -3257,7 +3261,7 @@ static void __iommu_remove_group_pasid(struct iommu_group *group,
struct group_device *device;
const struct iommu_ops *ops;
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->devices, list) {
+ for_each_group_device(group, device) {
ops = dev_iommu_ops(device->dev);
ops->remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid);
}
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-11 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-11 4:41 [PATCH v5 00/17] Consolidate the error handling around device attachment Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:41 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] iommu: Replace iommu_group_device_count() with list_count_nodes() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] iommu: Make __iommu_group_set_domain() handle error unwind Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] iommu: Use __iommu_group_set_domain() for __iommu_attach_group() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] iommu: Use __iommu_group_set_domain() in iommu_change_dev_def_domain() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] iommu: Replace __iommu_group_dma_first_attach() with set_domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] iommu: Remove iommu_group_do_dma_first_attach() from iommu_group_add_device() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] iommu: Replace iommu_group_do_dma_first_attach with __iommu_device_set_domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] iommu: Fix iommu_probe_device() to attach the right domain Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] iommu: Do iommu_group_create_direct_mappings() before attach Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-05 7:09 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2023-06-05 13:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-05 14:00 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-05 14:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-06 5:33 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] iommu: Remove the assignment of group->domain during default domain alloc Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] iommu: Consolidate the code to calculate the target default domain type Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] iommu: Revise iommu_group_alloc_default_domain() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] iommu: Consolidate the default_domain setup to one function Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] iommu: Allow IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT to work on ARM Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] iommu: Remove __iommu_group_for_each_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-11 4:42 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] iommu: Tidy the control flow in iommu_group_store_type() Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-23 6:16 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] Consolidate the error handling around device attachment Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2-v5-1b99ae392328+44574-iommu_err_unwind_jgg@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).