From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: status of the calgary iommu driver Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:03:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20190409140347.GA11524@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Muli Ben-Yehuda , Jon Mason Cc: x86@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi Muli and Jon, do you know if there are user of systems with the Calgary iommu around still? It seems like the last non-drive by changes to it are from 2010 and I'm not sure how common these systems were. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E6FC282CE for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11ED2084F for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E11ED2084F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E45FFB; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FF1FBF for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:04:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0A176D for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D353F68B02; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:03:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Muli Ben-Yehuda , Jon Mason Subject: status of the calgary iommu driver Message-ID: <20190409140347.GA11524@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Message-ID: <20190409140347._6zNHQTVa1a6_EK4l_3uprWihjMKk6hcejVsWLEt1Xo@z> Hi Muli and Jon, do you know if there are user of systems with the Calgary iommu around still? It seems like the last non-drive by changes to it are from 2010 and I'm not sure how common these systems were. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu