iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver: core: Allow subsystems to continue deferring probe
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:10:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614091058.GA25912@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190613170011.9647-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:00:11PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> Some subsystems, such as pinctrl, allow continuing to defer probe
> indefinitely. This is useful for devices that depend on resources
> provided by devices that are only probed after the init stage.
> 
> One example of this can be seen on Tegra, where the DPAUX hardware
> contains pinmuxing controls for pins that it shares with an I2C
> controller. The I2C controller is typically used for communication
> with a monitor over HDMI (DDC). However, other instances of the I2C
> controller are used to access system critical components, such as a
> PMIC. The I2C controller driver will therefore usually be a builtin
> driver, whereas the DPAUX driver is part of the display driver that
> is loaded from a module to avoid bloating the kernel image with all
> of the DRM/KMS subsystem.
> 
> In this particular case the pins used by this I2C/DDC controller
> become accessible very late in the boot process. However, since the
> controller is only used in conjunction with display, that's not an
> issue.
> 
> Unfortunately the driver core currently outputs a warning message
> when a device fails to get the pinctrl before the end of the init
> stage. That can be confusing for the user because it may sound like
> an unwanted error occurred, whereas it's really an expected and
> harmless situation.
> 
> In order to eliminate this warning, this patch allows callers of the
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state() helper to specify that they want
> to continue deferring probe, regardless of whether we're past the
> init stage or not. All of the callers of that function are updated
> for the new signature, but only the pinctrl subsystem passes a true
> value in the new persist parameter if appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - pass persist flag via flags parameter to make the function call easier
>   to understand
> 
>  drivers/base/dd.c            | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/devicetree.c |  9 +++++----
>  include/linux/device.h       | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 0df9b4461766..0399a6f6c479 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -238,23 +238,32 @@ __setup("deferred_probe_timeout=", deferred_probe_timeout_setup);
>  /**
>   * driver_deferred_probe_check_state() - Check deferred probe state
>   * @dev: device to check
> + * @flags: Flags used to control the behavior of this function. Drivers can
> + *   set the DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST flag to indicate that they want to
> + *   keep trying to probe after built-in drivers have had a chance to probe.
> + *   This is useful for built-in drivers that rely on resources provided by
> + *   modular drivers.
>   *
>   * Returns -ENODEV if init is done and all built-in drivers have had a chance
> - * to probe (i.e. initcalls are done), -ETIMEDOUT if deferred probe debug
> - * timeout has expired, or -EPROBE_DEFER if none of those conditions are met.
> + * to probe (i.e. initcalls are done) and unless the DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST
> + * flag is set, -ETIMEDOUT if deferred probe debug timeout has expired, or
> + * -EPROBE_DEFER if none of those conditions are met.
>   *
>   * Drivers or subsystems can opt-in to calling this function instead of directly
>   * returning -EPROBE_DEFER.
>   */
> -int driver_deferred_probe_check_state(struct device *dev)
> +int driver_deferred_probe_check_state(struct device *dev, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>  	if (initcalls_done) {
>  		if (!deferred_probe_timeout) {
>  			dev_WARN(dev, "deferred probe timeout, ignoring dependency");
>  			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  		}
> -		dev_warn(dev, "ignoring dependency for device, assuming no driver");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		if ((flags & DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST) == 0) {
> +			dev_warn(dev, "ignoring dependency for device, assuming no driver");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 33c30c1e6a30..6198c6a30fe2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ static int __genpd_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, struct device *base_dev,
>  		mutex_unlock(&gpd_list_lock);
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "%s() failed to find PM domain: %ld\n",
>  			__func__, PTR_ERR(pd));
> -		return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(base_dev);
> +		return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(base_dev, 0);

Again, I said no odd flags for functions, how is anyone supposed to know
what "0" means here?

You just swapped a boolean for a bitmapped flag, right?  That did not
make the api any easier to understand at all.

> +/*
> + * This can be use to continue to defer probe after the init stage and after
> + * all the built-in drivers have had a chance to probe. This is useful if a
> + * built-in driver requires resources provided by a modular driver.
> + *
> + * One such example is the pinctrl subsystem, where for example the DPAUX
> + * hardware on Tegra provides pinmuxing controls for pins shared between DPAUX
> + * and I2C controllers. Only a subset of I2C controllers need the DPAUX
> + * pinmuxing, and some I2C controllers are used during early boot for critical
> + * tasks (such as communicating with the system PMIC). The I2C controllers
> + * that don't share pins with a DPAUX block will want to be driven by a built-
> + * in driver to make sure they are available early on.
> + */
> +#define DRIVER_DEFER_PROBE_PERSIST (1 << 0)

In the future, please always use BIT() for stuff like this.

Anyway, this isn't ok, do it correctly please, like I asked for the
first time...

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-13 17:00 [PATCH v2] driver: core: Allow subsystems to continue deferring probe Thierry Reding
2019-06-13 17:11 ` Rob Herring
2019-06-14  9:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-14  9:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-06-14  9:38   ` Thierry Reding
2019-06-14 10:10     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-14 14:36       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190614091058.GA25912@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).