iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com"
	<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 5/5] mmc: queue: Use bigger segments if IOMMU can merge the segments
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 08:53:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617065331.GA5456@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSBPR01MB3590FA5DB10D9EF34F551335D8EB0@OSBPR01MB3590.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 06:46:33AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > can_merge seems a little too generic a name to me.  Maybe can_iommu_merge?
> 
> I'll fix the name. Also, only the device_iommu_mapped() condition wiil cause
> a problem on iommu=pt [1]. So, I'll add another condition here.

Instead of adding another condition here I think we need to properly
abstract it out in the DMA layer.  E.g. have a

unsigned long dma_get_merge_boundary(struct device *dev)
{
	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);

	if (!ops || !ops->get_merge_boundary)
		return 0; /* can't merge */
	return ops->get_merge_boundary(dev);
}

and then implement the method in dma-iommu.c.

blk_queue_can_use_iommu_merging then comes:

bool blk_queue_enable_iommu_merging(struct request_queue *q,
		struct device *dev)
{
	unsigned long boundary = dma_get_merge_boundary(dev);

	if (!boundary)
		return false;
	blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, boundary);
	return true;
}
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-13 10:20 [RFC PATCH v6 0/5] treewide: improve R-Car SDHI performance Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: add an exported function to get minimum page size for a domain Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:37   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-14  7:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-17  5:08     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-14  9:41   ` Robin Murphy
2019-06-17  5:23     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/5] block: sort headers on blk-setting.c Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:40   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/5] block: add a helper function to merge the segments by an IOMMU Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-14  7:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14  9:54   ` Robin Murphy
2019-06-17  6:29     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/5] mmc: tmio: Use dma_max_mapping_size() instead of a workaround Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:45   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-17  4:25     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 20:35   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-14  7:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14  7:27       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-17  4:54         ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-17  6:23           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-17  6:54             ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 5/5] mmc: queue: Use bigger segments if IOMMU can merge the segments Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:58   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-17  6:38     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-14  7:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 10:42     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-17  6:46     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-17  6:53       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-06-17  7:02         ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/5] treewide: improve R-Car SDHI performance Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190617065331.GA5456@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).