* [RFC CFT 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase maximum size of queues
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-11 13:45 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:45 ` [RFC CFT 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes Will Deacon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-11 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Will Deacon, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
We've been artificially limiting the size of our queues to 4k so that we
don't end up allocating huge amounts of physically-contiguous memory at
probe time. However, 4k is only enough for 256 commands in the command
queue, so instead let's try to allocate the largest queue that the SMMU
supports, retrying with a smaller size if the allocation fails.
The caveat here is that we have to limit our upper bound based on
CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT to ensure that our queue allocations remain
natually aligned, which is required by the SMMU architecture.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 4d5a694f02c2..65de2458999f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@
#define Q_BASE_RWA (1UL << 62)
#define Q_BASE_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 5)
#define Q_BASE_LOG2SIZE GENMASK(4, 0)
+#define Q_MAX_SZ_SHIFT (PAGE_SHIFT + CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT)
/*
* Stream table.
@@ -289,8 +290,9 @@
FIELD_GET(ARM64_TCR_##fld, tcr))
/* Command queue */
-#define CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS 2
-#define CMDQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 8
+#define CMDQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT 4
+#define CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS ((1 << CMDQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT) >> 3)
+#define CMDQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT (Q_MAX_SZ_SHIFT - CMDQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT)
#define CMDQ_CONS_ERR GENMASK(30, 24)
#define CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_NONE_IDX 0
@@ -336,14 +338,16 @@
#define CMDQ_SYNC_1_MSIADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 2)
/* Event queue */
-#define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS 4
-#define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 7
+#define EVTQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT 5
+#define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS ((1 << EVTQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT) >> 3)
+#define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT (Q_MAX_SZ_SHIFT - EVTQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT)
#define EVTQ_0_ID GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
/* PRI queue */
-#define PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS 2
-#define PRIQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 8
+#define PRIQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT 4
+#define PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS ((1 << PRIQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT) >> 3)
+#define PRIQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT (Q_MAX_SZ_SHIFT - PRIQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT)
#define PRIQ_0_SID GENMASK_ULL(31, 0)
#define PRIQ_0_SSID GENMASK_ULL(51, 32)
@@ -798,7 +802,7 @@ static int queue_remove_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
/* High-level queue accessors */
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
{
- memset(cmd, 0, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS << 3);
+ memset(cmd, 0, 1 << CMDQ_ENT_SZ_SHIFT);
cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_0_OP, ent->opcode);
switch (ent->opcode) {
@@ -2270,17 +2274,32 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_one_queue(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
struct arm_smmu_queue *q,
unsigned long prod_off,
unsigned long cons_off,
- size_t dwords)
+ size_t dwords, const char *name)
{
- size_t qsz = ((1 << q->max_n_shift) * dwords) << 3;
+ size_t qsz;
+
+ do {
+ qsz = ((1 << q->max_n_shift) * dwords) << 3;
+ q->base = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, qsz, &q->base_dma,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (q->base || qsz < PAGE_SIZE)
+ break;
+
+ q->max_n_shift--;
+ } while (1);
- q->base = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, qsz, &q->base_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!q->base) {
- dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to allocate queue (0x%zx bytes)\n",
- qsz);
+ dev_err(smmu->dev,
+ "failed to allocate queue (0x%zx bytes) for %s\n",
+ qsz, name);
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ if (!WARN_ON(q->base_dma & (qsz - 1))) {
+ dev_info(smmu->dev, "allocated %u entries for %s\n",
+ 1 << q->max_n_shift, name);
+ }
+
q->prod_reg = arm_smmu_page1_fixup(prod_off, smmu);
q->cons_reg = arm_smmu_page1_fixup(cons_off, smmu);
q->ent_dwords = dwords;
@@ -2300,13 +2319,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_queues(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
/* cmdq */
spin_lock_init(&smmu->cmdq.lock);
ret = arm_smmu_init_one_queue(smmu, &smmu->cmdq.q, ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_PROD,
- ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_CONS, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS);
+ ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_CONS, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS,
+ "cmdq");
if (ret)
return ret;
/* evtq */
ret = arm_smmu_init_one_queue(smmu, &smmu->evtq.q, ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_PROD,
- ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_CONS, EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS);
+ ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_CONS, EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS,
+ "evtq");
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2315,7 +2336,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_queues(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
return 0;
return arm_smmu_init_one_queue(smmu, &smmu->priq.q, ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_PROD,
- ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_CONS, PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS);
+ ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_CONS, PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS,
+ "priq");
}
static int arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
@@ -2879,7 +2901,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
return -ENXIO;
}
- /* Queue sizes, capped at 4k */
+ /* Queue sizes, capped to ensure natural alignment */
smmu->cmdq.q.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, CMDQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
FIELD_GET(IDR1_CMDQS, reg));
if (!smmu->cmdq.q.max_n_shift) {
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC CFT 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:45 ` [RFC CFT 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase maximum size of queues Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-11 13:45 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro Will Deacon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-11 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Will Deacon, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
In preparation for rewriting the command queue insertion code to use a
new algorithm, separate the software and hardware views of the prod and
cons indexes so that manipulating the software state doesn't
automatically update the hardware state at the same time.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 65de2458999f..2d756e63865b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -691,17 +691,13 @@ static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
Q_WRP(q, q->prod) == Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
}
-static void queue_sync_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static void queue_sync_cons_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
q->cons = readl_relaxed(q->cons_reg);
}
-static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons)) + 1;
-
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
-
/*
* Ensure that all CPU accesses (reads and writes) to the queue
* are complete before we update the cons pointer.
@@ -710,7 +706,13 @@ static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
writel_relaxed(q->cons, q->cons_reg);
}
-static int queue_sync_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+{
+ u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons)) + 1;
+ q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
+}
+
+static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
int ret = 0;
u32 prod = readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg);
@@ -722,12 +724,15 @@ static int queue_sync_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
return ret;
}
+static void queue_sync_prod_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+{
+ writel(q->prod, q->prod_reg);
+}
+
static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + 1;
-
q->prod = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
- writel(q->prod, q->prod_reg);
}
/*
@@ -744,7 +749,7 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool sync, bool wfe)
ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US :
ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
- while (queue_sync_cons(q), (sync ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
+ while (queue_sync_cons_in(q), (sync ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
@@ -778,6 +783,7 @@ static int queue_insert_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
queue_write(Q_ENT(q, q->prod), ent, q->ent_dwords);
queue_inc_prod(q);
+ queue_sync_prod_out(q);
return 0;
}
@@ -796,6 +802,7 @@ static int queue_remove_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
queue_read(ent, Q_ENT(q, q->cons), q->ent_dwords);
queue_inc_cons(q);
+ queue_sync_cons_out(q);
return 0;
}
@@ -1316,7 +1323,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
* Not much we can do on overflow, so scream and pretend we're
* trying harder.
*/
- if (queue_sync_prod(q) == -EOVERFLOW)
+ if (queue_sync_prod_in(q) == -EOVERFLOW)
dev_err(smmu->dev, "EVTQ overflow detected -- events lost\n");
} while (!queue_empty(q));
@@ -1373,7 +1380,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
while (!queue_remove_raw(q, evt))
arm_smmu_handle_ppr(smmu, evt);
- if (queue_sync_prod(q) == -EOVERFLOW)
+ if (queue_sync_prod_in(q) == -EOVERFLOW)
dev_err(smmu->dev, "PRIQ overflow detected -- requests lost\n");
} while (!queue_empty(q));
@@ -1564,8 +1571,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie)
/*
* NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with
* PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible
- * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod()
- * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007.
+ * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in
+ * queue_sync_prod_out() to guarantee those are observed before the
+ * TLBI. Do be careful, 007.
*/
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &cmd);
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(smmu);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC CFT 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:45 ` [RFC CFT 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase maximum size of queues Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:45 ` [RFC CFT 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-11 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue Will Deacon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Will Deacon, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
The Q_OVF macro doesn't need to access the arm_smmu_queue structure, so
drop the unused macro argument.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2d756e63865b..1b7e8fe26c41 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
#define Q_IDX(q, p) ((p) & ((1 << (q)->max_n_shift) - 1))
#define Q_WRP(q, p) ((p) & (1 << (q)->max_n_shift))
#define Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG (1 << 31)
-#define Q_OVF(q, p) ((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
+#define Q_OVF(p) ((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
#define Q_ENT(q, p) ((q)->base + \
Q_IDX(q, p) * (q)->ent_dwords)
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons)) + 1;
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
+ q->cons = Q_OVF(q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
}
static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
int ret = 0;
u32 prod = readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg);
- if (Q_OVF(q, prod) != Q_OVF(q, q->prod))
+ if (Q_OVF(prod) != Q_OVF(q->prod))
ret = -EOVERFLOW;
q->prod = prod;
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void queue_sync_prod_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + 1;
- q->prod = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
+ q->prod = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
}
/*
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
} while (!queue_empty(q));
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
+ q->cons = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
} while (!queue_empty(q));
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
+ q->cons = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
writel(q->cons, q->cons_reg);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC CFT 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-11 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible Will Deacon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Will Deacon, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
In preparation for rewriting the command queue insertion code to use a
new algorithm, introduce a new arm_smmu_ll_queue structure which contains
only the information necessary to perform queue arithmetic for a queue
and will later be extended so that we can perform complex atomic
manipulation on some of the fields.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 1b7e8fe26c41..d72da799bd0a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@
#define ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_DEVICE_nGnRE 0x1
#define ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_OIWB 0xf
-#define Q_IDX(q, p) ((p) & ((1 << (q)->max_n_shift) - 1))
-#define Q_WRP(q, p) ((p) & (1 << (q)->max_n_shift))
+#define Q_IDX(q, p) ((p) & ((1 << (q)->llq.max_n_shift) - 1))
+#define Q_WRP(q, p) ((p) & (1 << (q)->llq.max_n_shift))
#define Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG (1 << 31)
#define Q_OVF(p) ((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
#define Q_ENT(q, p) ((q)->base + \
@@ -472,7 +472,14 @@ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent {
};
};
+struct arm_smmu_ll_queue {
+ u32 prod;
+ u32 cons;
+ u32 max_n_shift;
+};
+
struct arm_smmu_queue {
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq;
int irq; /* Wired interrupt */
__le64 *base;
@@ -480,9 +487,6 @@ struct arm_smmu_queue {
u64 q_base;
size_t ent_dwords;
- u32 max_n_shift;
- u32 prod;
- u32 cons;
u32 __iomem *prod_reg;
u32 __iomem *cons_reg;
@@ -681,19 +685,19 @@ static void parse_driver_options(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
/* Low-level queue manipulation functions */
static bool queue_full(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
- Q_WRP(q, q->prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
+ return Q_IDX(q, q->llq.prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons) &&
+ Q_WRP(q, q->llq.prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons);
}
static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
- Q_WRP(q, q->prod) == Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
+ return Q_IDX(q, q->llq.prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons) &&
+ Q_WRP(q, q->llq.prod) == Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons);
}
static void queue_sync_cons_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- q->cons = readl_relaxed(q->cons_reg);
+ q->llq.cons = readl_relaxed(q->cons_reg);
}
static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -703,13 +707,13 @@ static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
* are complete before we update the cons pointer.
*/
mb();
- writel_relaxed(q->cons, q->cons_reg);
+ writel_relaxed(q->llq.cons, q->cons_reg);
}
static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons)) + 1;
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
+ u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons)) + 1;
+ q->llq.cons = Q_OVF(q->llq.cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
}
static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -717,22 +721,22 @@ static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
int ret = 0;
u32 prod = readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg);
- if (Q_OVF(prod) != Q_OVF(q->prod))
+ if (Q_OVF(prod) != Q_OVF(q->llq.prod))
ret = -EOVERFLOW;
- q->prod = prod;
+ q->llq.prod = prod;
return ret;
}
static void queue_sync_prod_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- writel(q->prod, q->prod_reg);
+ writel(q->llq.prod, q->prod_reg);
}
static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
{
- u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + 1;
- q->prod = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
+ u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->llq.prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->llq.prod)) + 1;
+ q->llq.prod = Q_OVF(q->llq.prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
}
/*
@@ -781,7 +785,7 @@ static int queue_insert_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
if (queue_full(q))
return -ENOSPC;
- queue_write(Q_ENT(q, q->prod), ent, q->ent_dwords);
+ queue_write(Q_ENT(q, q->llq.prod), ent, q->ent_dwords);
queue_inc_prod(q);
queue_sync_prod_out(q);
return 0;
@@ -800,7 +804,7 @@ static int queue_remove_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
if (queue_empty(q))
return -EAGAIN;
- queue_read(ent, Q_ENT(q, q->cons), q->ent_dwords);
+ queue_read(ent, Q_ENT(q, q->llq.cons), q->ent_dwords);
queue_inc_cons(q);
queue_sync_cons_out(q);
return 0;
@@ -1328,7 +1332,8 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
} while (!queue_empty(q));
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
+ q->llq.cons = Q_OVF(q->llq.prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons) |
+ Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -1385,8 +1390,9 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
} while (!queue_empty(q));
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
- q->cons = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
- writel(q->cons, q->cons_reg);
+ q->llq.cons = Q_OVF(q->llq.prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons) |
+ Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons);
+ writel(q->llq.cons, q->cons_reg);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -2287,13 +2293,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_one_queue(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
size_t qsz;
do {
- qsz = ((1 << q->max_n_shift) * dwords) << 3;
+ qsz = ((1 << q->llq.max_n_shift) * dwords) << 3;
q->base = dmam_alloc_coherent(smmu->dev, qsz, &q->base_dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (q->base || qsz < PAGE_SIZE)
break;
- q->max_n_shift--;
+ q->llq.max_n_shift--;
} while (1);
if (!q->base) {
@@ -2305,7 +2311,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_one_queue(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
if (!WARN_ON(q->base_dma & (qsz - 1))) {
dev_info(smmu->dev, "allocated %u entries for %s\n",
- 1 << q->max_n_shift, name);
+ 1 << q->llq.max_n_shift, name);
}
q->prod_reg = arm_smmu_page1_fixup(prod_off, smmu);
@@ -2314,9 +2320,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_one_queue(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
q->q_base = Q_BASE_RWA;
q->q_base |= q->base_dma & Q_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
- q->q_base |= FIELD_PREP(Q_BASE_LOG2SIZE, q->max_n_shift);
+ q->q_base |= FIELD_PREP(Q_BASE_LOG2SIZE, q->llq.max_n_shift);
- q->prod = q->cons = 0;
+ q->llq.prod = q->llq.cons = 0;
return 0;
}
@@ -2709,8 +2715,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, bool bypass)
/* Command queue */
writeq_relaxed(smmu->cmdq.q.q_base, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_BASE);
- writel_relaxed(smmu->cmdq.q.prod, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_PROD);
- writel_relaxed(smmu->cmdq.q.cons, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_CONS);
+ writel_relaxed(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.prod, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_PROD);
+ writel_relaxed(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.cons, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_CONS);
enables = CR0_CMDQEN;
ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, enables, ARM_SMMU_CR0,
@@ -2737,9 +2743,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, bool bypass)
/* Event queue */
writeq_relaxed(smmu->evtq.q.q_base, smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_BASE);
- writel_relaxed(smmu->evtq.q.prod,
+ writel_relaxed(smmu->evtq.q.llq.prod,
arm_smmu_page1_fixup(ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_PROD, smmu));
- writel_relaxed(smmu->evtq.q.cons,
+ writel_relaxed(smmu->evtq.q.llq.cons,
arm_smmu_page1_fixup(ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_CONS, smmu));
enables |= CR0_EVTQEN;
@@ -2754,9 +2760,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, bool bypass)
if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI) {
writeq_relaxed(smmu->priq.q.q_base,
smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_BASE);
- writel_relaxed(smmu->priq.q.prod,
+ writel_relaxed(smmu->priq.q.llq.prod,
arm_smmu_page1_fixup(ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_PROD, smmu));
- writel_relaxed(smmu->priq.q.cons,
+ writel_relaxed(smmu->priq.q.llq.cons,
arm_smmu_page1_fixup(ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_CONS, smmu));
enables |= CR0_PRIQEN;
@@ -2910,18 +2916,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
}
/* Queue sizes, capped to ensure natural alignment */
- smmu->cmdq.q.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, CMDQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
- FIELD_GET(IDR1_CMDQS, reg));
- if (!smmu->cmdq.q.max_n_shift) {
+ smmu->cmdq.q.llq.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, CMDQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
+ FIELD_GET(IDR1_CMDQS, reg));
+ if (!smmu->cmdq.q.llq.max_n_shift) {
/* Odd alignment restrictions on the base, so ignore for now */
dev_err(smmu->dev, "unit-length command queue not supported\n");
return -ENXIO;
}
- smmu->evtq.q.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
- FIELD_GET(IDR1_EVTQS, reg));
- smmu->priq.q.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, PRIQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
- FIELD_GET(IDR1_PRIQS, reg));
+ smmu->evtq.q.llq.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
+ FIELD_GET(IDR1_EVTQS, reg));
+ smmu->priq.q.llq.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, PRIQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
+ FIELD_GET(IDR1_PRIQS, reg));
/* SID/SSID sizes */
smmu->ssid_bits = FIELD_GET(IDR1_SSIDSIZE, reg);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC CFT 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-11 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion Will Deacon
2019-06-17 13:38 ` [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue John Garry
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Will Deacon, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
In preparation for rewriting the command queue insertion code to use a
new algorithm, rework many of our queue macro accessors and manipulation
functions so that they operate on the arm_smmu_ll_queue structure where
possible. This will allow us to call these helpers on local variables
without having to construct a full-blown arm_smmu_queue on the stack.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d72da799bd0a..85535400a365 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -181,12 +181,13 @@
#define ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_DEVICE_nGnRE 0x1
#define ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_OIWB 0xf
-#define Q_IDX(q, p) ((p) & ((1 << (q)->llq.max_n_shift) - 1))
-#define Q_WRP(q, p) ((p) & (1 << (q)->llq.max_n_shift))
+#define Q_IDX(llq, p) ((p) & ((1 << (llq)->max_n_shift) - 1))
+#define Q_WRP(llq, p) ((p) & (1 << (llq)->max_n_shift))
#define Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG (1 << 31)
#define Q_OVF(p) ((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
#define Q_ENT(q, p) ((q)->base + \
- Q_IDX(q, p) * (q)->ent_dwords)
+ Q_IDX(&((q)->llq), p) * \
+ (q)->ent_dwords)
#define Q_BASE_RWA (1UL << 62)
#define Q_BASE_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 5)
@@ -683,16 +684,16 @@ static void parse_driver_options(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
}
/* Low-level queue manipulation functions */
-static bool queue_full(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static bool queue_full(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
{
- return Q_IDX(q, q->llq.prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons) &&
- Q_WRP(q, q->llq.prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons);
+ return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
+ Q_WRP(q, q->prod) != Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
}
-static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
{
- return Q_IDX(q, q->llq.prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons) &&
- Q_WRP(q, q->llq.prod) == Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons);
+ return Q_IDX(q, q->prod) == Q_IDX(q, q->cons) &&
+ Q_WRP(q, q->prod) == Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
}
static void queue_sync_cons_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -710,10 +711,10 @@ static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
writel_relaxed(q->llq.cons, q->cons_reg);
}
-static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
{
- u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons)) + 1;
- q->llq.cons = Q_OVF(q->llq.cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
+ u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons)) + 1;
+ q->cons = Q_OVF(q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
}
static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -733,10 +734,10 @@ static void queue_sync_prod_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
writel(q->llq.prod, q->prod_reg);
}
-static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
{
- u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->llq.prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->llq.prod)) + 1;
- q->llq.prod = Q_OVF(q->llq.prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
+ u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + 1;
+ q->prod = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
}
/*
@@ -753,7 +754,8 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool sync, bool wfe)
ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US :
ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
- while (queue_sync_cons_in(q), (sync ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
+ while (queue_sync_cons_in(q),
+ (sync ? !queue_empty(&q->llq) : queue_full(&q->llq))) {
if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
@@ -782,11 +784,11 @@ static void queue_write(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
static int queue_insert_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
{
- if (queue_full(q))
+ if (queue_full(&q->llq))
return -ENOSPC;
queue_write(Q_ENT(q, q->llq.prod), ent, q->ent_dwords);
- queue_inc_prod(q);
+ queue_inc_prod(&q->llq);
queue_sync_prod_out(q);
return 0;
}
@@ -801,11 +803,11 @@ static void queue_read(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
static int queue_remove_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
{
- if (queue_empty(q))
+ if (queue_empty(&q->llq))
return -EAGAIN;
queue_read(ent, Q_ENT(q, q->llq.cons), q->ent_dwords);
- queue_inc_cons(q);
+ queue_inc_cons(&q->llq);
queue_sync_cons_out(q);
return 0;
}
@@ -1310,6 +1312,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
int i;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->evtq.q;
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq = &q->llq;
u64 evt[EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS];
do {
@@ -1329,11 +1332,11 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
*/
if (queue_sync_prod_in(q) == -EOVERFLOW)
dev_err(smmu->dev, "EVTQ overflow detected -- events lost\n");
- } while (!queue_empty(q));
+ } while (!queue_empty(llq));
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
- q->llq.cons = Q_OVF(q->llq.prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons) |
- Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons);
+ llq->cons = Q_OVF(llq->prod) | Q_WRP(llq, llq->cons) |
+ Q_IDX(llq, llq->cons);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -1379,6 +1382,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->priq.q;
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq = &q->llq;
u64 evt[PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS];
do {
@@ -1387,12 +1391,12 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
if (queue_sync_prod_in(q) == -EOVERFLOW)
dev_err(smmu->dev, "PRIQ overflow detected -- requests lost\n");
- } while (!queue_empty(q));
+ } while (!queue_empty(llq));
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
- q->llq.cons = Q_OVF(q->llq.prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->llq.cons) |
- Q_IDX(q, q->llq.cons);
- writel(q->llq.cons, q->cons_reg);
+ llq->cons = Q_OVF(llq->prod) | Q_WRP(llq, llq->cons) |
+ Q_IDX(llq, llq->cons);
+ queue_sync_cons_out(q);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [RFC CFT 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-11 13:46 ` Will Deacon
2019-06-17 13:38 ` [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue John Garry
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Will Deacon, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
The SMMU command queue is a bottleneck in large systems, thanks to the
spin_lock which serialises accesses from all CPUs to the single queue
supported by the hardware.
Attempt to improve this situation by moving to a new algorithm for
inserting commands into the queue, which is lock-free on the fast-path.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 579 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 441 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 85535400a365..1e9fa83b502a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
#define Q_IDX(llq, p) ((p) & ((1 << (llq)->max_n_shift) - 1))
#define Q_WRP(llq, p) ((p) & (1 << (llq)->max_n_shift))
-#define Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG (1 << 31)
+#define Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG (1U << 31)
#define Q_OVF(p) ((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
#define Q_ENT(q, p) ((q)->base + \
Q_IDX(&((q)->llq), p) * \
@@ -301,6 +301,8 @@
#define CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_ABT_IDX 2
#define CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_ATC_INV_IDX 3
+#define CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG
+
#define CMDQ_0_OP GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
#define CMDQ_0_SSV (1UL << 11)
@@ -363,9 +365,8 @@
#define PRIQ_1_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(63, 12)
/* High-level queue structures */
-#define ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 100
-#define ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US 1000000 /* 1s! */
-#define ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_SPIN_COUNT 10
+#define ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 1000000 /* 1s! */
+#define ARM_SMMU_POLL_SPIN_COUNT 10
#define MSI_IOVA_BASE 0x8000000
#define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH 0x100000
@@ -467,15 +468,24 @@ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent {
#define CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC 0x46
struct {
- u32 msidata;
- u64 msiaddr;
+ bool msi;
} sync;
};
};
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue {
- u32 prod;
- u32 cons;
+ union {
+ u64 val;
+ struct {
+ u32 prod;
+ u32 cons;
+ };
+ struct {
+ atomic_t prod;
+ atomic_t cons;
+ } atomic;
+ u8 __pad[SMP_CACHE_BYTES];
+ } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
u32 max_n_shift;
};
@@ -493,9 +503,18 @@ struct arm_smmu_queue {
u32 __iomem *cons_reg;
};
+struct arm_smmu_queue_poll {
+ ktime_t timeout;
+ unsigned int delay;
+ unsigned int spin_cnt;
+ bool wfe;
+};
+
struct arm_smmu_cmdq {
struct arm_smmu_queue q;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ unsigned long *valid_map;
+ atomic_t owner_prod;
+ atomic_t lock;
};
struct arm_smmu_evtq {
@@ -595,12 +614,6 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg strtab_cfg;
- /* Hi16xx adds an extra 32 bits of goodness to its MSI payload */
- union {
- u32 sync_count;
- u64 padding;
- };
-
/* IOMMU core code handle */
struct iommu_device iommu;
};
@@ -696,9 +709,12 @@ static bool queue_empty(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
Q_WRP(q, q->prod) == Q_WRP(q, q->cons);
}
-static void queue_sync_cons_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static bool queue_consumed(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q, u32 prod)
{
- q->llq.cons = readl_relaxed(q->cons_reg);
+ return ((Q_WRP(q, q->cons) == Q_WRP(q, prod)) &&
+ (Q_IDX(q, q->cons) > Q_IDX(q, prod))) ||
+ ((Q_WRP(q, q->cons) != Q_WRP(q, prod)) &&
+ (Q_IDX(q, q->cons) <= Q_IDX(q, prod)));
}
static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -729,46 +745,39 @@ static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
return ret;
}
-static void queue_sync_prod_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
+static u32 queue_inc_prod_n(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q, int n)
{
- writel(q->llq.prod, q->prod_reg);
+ u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + n;
+ return Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
}
static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q)
{
- u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + 1;
- q->prod = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
+ q->prod = queue_inc_prod_n(q, 1);
}
-/*
- * Wait for the SMMU to consume items. If sync is true, wait until the queue
- * is empty. Otherwise, wait until there is at least one free slot.
- */
-static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool sync, bool wfe)
+static void queue_poll_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll *qp)
{
- ktime_t timeout;
- unsigned int delay = 1, spin_cnt = 0;
-
- /* Wait longer if it's a CMD_SYNC */
- timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), sync ?
- ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US :
- ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
+ qp->delay = 1;
+ qp->spin_cnt = 0;
+ qp->wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV);
+ qp->timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
+}
- while (queue_sync_cons_in(q),
- (sync ? !queue_empty(&q->llq) : queue_full(&q->llq))) {
- if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
+static int queue_poll(struct arm_smmu_queue_poll *qp)
+{
+ if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), qp->timeout) > 0)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
- if (wfe) {
- wfe();
- } else if (++spin_cnt < ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_SPIN_COUNT) {
- cpu_relax();
- continue;
- } else {
- udelay(delay);
- delay *= 2;
- spin_cnt = 0;
- }
+ if (qp->wfe) {
+ wfe();
+ } else if (++qp->spin_cnt < ARM_SMMU_POLL_SPIN_COUNT) {
+ cpu_relax();
+ } else {
+ udelay(qp->delay);
+ qp->delay *= 2;
+ qp->spin_cnt = 0;
}
return 0;
@@ -782,17 +791,6 @@ static void queue_write(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
*dst++ = cpu_to_le64(*src++);
}
-static int queue_insert_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
-{
- if (queue_full(&q->llq))
- return -ENOSPC;
-
- queue_write(Q_ENT(q, q->llq.prod), ent, q->ent_dwords);
- queue_inc_prod(&q->llq);
- queue_sync_prod_out(q);
- return 0;
-}
-
static void queue_read(__le64 *dst, u64 *src, size_t n_dwords)
{
int i;
@@ -875,20 +873,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
cmd[1] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_PRI_1_RESP, ent->pri.resp);
break;
case CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC:
- if (ent->sync.msiaddr)
+ if (ent->sync.msi)
cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS, CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_IRQ);
else
cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS, CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV);
cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH);
cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSIATTR, ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_OIWB);
- /*
- * Commands are written little-endian, but we want the SMMU to
- * receive MSIData, and thus write it back to memory, in CPU
- * byte order, so big-endian needs an extra byteswap here.
- */
- cmd[0] |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSIDATA,
- cpu_to_le32(ent->sync.msidata));
- cmd[1] |= ent->sync.msiaddr & CMDQ_SYNC_1_MSIADDR_MASK;
break;
default:
return -ENOENT;
@@ -897,6 +887,20 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
return 0;
}
+static void arm_smmu_cmdq_cmd_set_msi_addr(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+ u32 prod)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &cmdq->q;
+ dma_addr_t addr = q->base_dma;
+
+ /*
+ * Beware that Hi16xx adds an extra 32 bits of goodness to its MSI
+ * payload, so the write will zero the entire command on that platform.
+ */
+ addr += Q_IDX(&q->llq, prod) * q->ent_dwords * 8;
+ cmd[1] |= (u64)addr & CMDQ_SYNC_1_MSIADDR_MASK;
+}
+
static void arm_smmu_cmdq_skip_err(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
static const char *cerror_str[] = {
@@ -955,109 +959,371 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_skip_err(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
queue_write(Q_ENT(q, cons), cmd, q->ent_dwords);
}
-static void arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64 *cmd)
+/*
+ * Command queue locking.
+ * This is a form of bastardised rwlock with the following major changes:
+ *
+ * - The only LOCK routines are exclusive_trylock() and shared_lock().
+ * Neither have barrier semantics, and instead provide only a control
+ * dependency.
+ *
+ * - The UNLOCK routines are supplemented with shared_tryunlock(), which
+ * fails if the caller appears to be the last lock holder (yes, this is
+ * racy). All successful UNLOCK routines have RELEASE semantics.
+ */
+static void arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_lock(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq)
{
- struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q;
- bool wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV);
+ int val;
+
+ do {
+ val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&cmdq->lock, VAL >= 0);
+ } while (atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&cmdq->lock, val, val + 1) != val);
+}
- smmu->prev_cmd_opcode = FIELD_GET(CMDQ_0_OP, cmd[0]);
+static void arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_unlock(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq)
+{
+ (void)atomic_dec_return_release(&cmdq->lock);
+}
- while (queue_insert_raw(q, cmd) == -ENOSPC) {
- if (queue_poll_cons(q, false, wfe))
- dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
+static bool arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_tryunlock(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq)
+{
+ if (atomic_read(&cmdq->lock) == 1)
+ return false;
+
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_unlock(cmdq);
+ return true;
+}
+
+#define arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_trylock_irqsave(cmdq, flags) \
+({ \
+ bool __ret; \
+ local_irq_save(flags); \
+ __ret = !atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&cmdq->lock, 0, -1); \
+ if (!__ret) \
+ local_irq_restore(flags); \
+ __ret; \
+})
+
+#define arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, flags) \
+({ \
+ atomic_set_release(&cmdq->lock, 0); \
+ local_irq_restore(flags); \
+})
+
+/*
+ * Command queue insertion.
+ * This is made fiddly by our attempts to achieve some sort of scalability
+ * since there is one queue shared amongst all of the CPUs in the system. If
+ * you like mixed-size concurrency, dependency ordering and relaxed atomics,
+ * then you'll *love* this monstrosity.
+ *
+ * The basic idea is to split the queue up into ranges of commands that are
+ * owned by a given CPU; the owner may not have written all of the commands
+ * itself, but is responsible for advancing the hardware prod pointer when
+ * the time comes. The algorithm is roughly:
+ *
+ * 1. Allocate some space in the queue. At this point we also discover
+ * whether the head of the queue is currently owned by another CPU,
+ * or whether we are the owner.
+ *
+ * 2. Write our command into our allocated slot in the queue.
+ *
+ * 3. Mark our slot as valid in arm_smmu_cmdq.valid_map.
+ *
+ * 4. If we are an owner:
+ * a. Wait for the previous owner to finish.
+ * b. Mark the queue head as unowned, which tells us the range
+ * that we are responsible for publishing.
+ * c. Wait for all commands in our owned range to become valid.
+ * d. Advance the hardware prod pointer.
+ * e. Tell the next owner we've finished.
+ *
+ * 5. If we are inserting a CMD_SYNC (we may or may not have been an
+ * owner), then we need to stick around until it has completed:
+ * a. If we have MSIs, the SMMU can write back into the CMD_SYNC
+ * to clear the first 4 bytes.
+ * b. Otherwise, we spin waiting for the hardware cons pointer to
+ * advance past our command.
+ *
+ * The devil is in the details, particularly the use of locking for handling
+ * SYNC completion and freeing up space in the queue before we think that it is
+ * full.
+ */
+
+/* Wait for all entries in the range [sprod, eprod) to become valid */
+static void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
+ u32 sprod, u32 eprod)
+{
+ u32 swidx, sbidx, ewidx, ebidx;
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = {
+ .max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift,
+ .prod = sprod,
+ };
+
+ ewidx = BIT_WORD(Q_IDX(&llq, eprod));
+ ebidx = Q_IDX(&llq, eprod) % BITS_PER_LONG;
+
+ while (llq.prod != eprod) {
+ unsigned long mask, valid, *ptr;
+ u32 limit = BITS_PER_LONG;
+
+ swidx = BIT_WORD(Q_IDX(&llq, llq.prod));
+ sbidx = Q_IDX(&llq, llq.prod) % BITS_PER_LONG;
+
+ ptr = &cmdq->valid_map[swidx];
+
+ if ((swidx == ewidx) && (sbidx < ebidx))
+ limit = ebidx;
+
+ mask = GENMASK(limit - 1, sbidx);
+
+ /*
+ * The valid bit is the inverse of the wrap bit. This means
+ * that a zero-initialised queue is invalid and, after marking
+ * all entries as valid, they become invalid again when we
+ * wrap.
+ */
+ valid = ULONG_MAX + !!Q_WRP(&llq, llq.prod);
+ smp_cond_load_relaxed(ptr, (VAL & mask) == (valid & mask));
+ llq.prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, limit - sbidx);
}
}
-static void arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
+/* Wait for the command queue to become non-full */
+static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_space(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
- u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
unsigned long flags;
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ int ret = 0;
- if (arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, ent)) {
- dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n",
- ent->opcode);
- return;
+ /*
+ * Try to update our copy of cons by grabbing exclusive cmdq access. If
+ * that fails, spin until somebody else updates it for us.
+ */
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_trylock_irqsave(cmdq, flags)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons, readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_exclusive_unlock_irqrestore(cmdq, flags);
+ llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
+ return 0;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
- arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
+ queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
+ do {
+ llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val);
+ if (!queue_full(llq))
+ break;
+
+ ret = queue_poll(&qp);
+ } while (!ret);
+
+ return ret;
}
/*
- * The difference between val and sync_idx is bounded by the maximum size of
- * a queue at 2^20 entries, so 32 bits is plenty for wrap-safe arithmetic.
+ * Wait until the SMMU signals a CMD_SYNC completion MSI.
+ * Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
*/
-static int __arm_smmu_sync_poll_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sync_idx)
+static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
- ktime_t timeout;
- u32 val;
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod));
- timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US);
- val = smp_cond_load_acquire(&smmu->sync_count,
- (int)(VAL - sync_idx) >= 0 ||
- !ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout));
+ queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
- return (int)(val - sync_idx) < 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : 0;
+ /*
+ * The MSI won't generate an event, since it's being written back
+ * into the command queue.
+ */
+ qp.wfe = false;
+ smp_cond_load_relaxed(cmd, !VAL || (ret = queue_poll(&qp)));
+ llq->cons = ret ? llq->prod : queue_inc_prod_n(llq, 1);
+ return ret;
}
-static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+/*
+ * Wait until the SMMU cons index passes llq->prod.
+ * Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
+ */
+static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
- u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
- unsigned long flags;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = {
- .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC,
- .sync = {
- .msiaddr = virt_to_phys(&smmu->sync_count),
- },
- };
+ struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ u32 prod = llq->prod;
+ int ret = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
+ queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
+ llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val);
+ do {
+ if (queue_consumed(llq, prod))
+ break;
- /* Piggy-back on the previous command if it's a SYNC */
- if (smmu->prev_cmd_opcode == CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC) {
- ent.sync.msidata = smmu->sync_nr;
- } else {
- ent.sync.msidata = ++smmu->sync_nr;
- arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, &ent);
- arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
- }
+ ret = queue_poll(&qp);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * This needs to be a readl() so that our subsequent call
+ * to arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_tryunlock() can fail accurately.
+ *
+ * Specifically, we need to ensure that we observe all
+ * shared_lock()s by other CMD_SYNCs that share our owner,
+ * so that a failing call to tryunlock() means that we're
+ * the last one out and therefore we can safely advance
+ * cmdq->q.llq.cons. Roughly speaking:
+ *
+ * CPU 0 CPU1 CPU2 (us)
+ *
+ * if (sync)
+ * shared_lock();
+ *
+ * dma_wmb();
+ * change_bit(valid_map)
+ *
+ * if (owner) {
+ * poll_valid_map();
+ * <control dependency>
+ * writel(prod_reg);
+ *
+ * readl(cons_reg);
+ * tryunlock();
+ *
+ * Requires us to see CPU 0's shared_lock() acquisition.
+ */
+ llq->cons = readl(cmdq->q.cons_reg);
+ } while (!ret);
- return __arm_smmu_sync_poll_msi(smmu, ent.sync.msidata);
+ return ret;
}
-static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
{
u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
unsigned long flags;
- bool wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV);
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC };
- int ret;
+ bool owner, sync = (ent->opcode == CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC);
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = {
+ .max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift,
+ }, head = llq;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, ent)) {
+ dev_warn(smmu->dev, "ignoring unknown CMDQ opcode 0x%x\n",
+ ent->opcode);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* 1. Allocate some space in the queue */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ do {
+ llq.val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
+
+ while (queue_full(&llq)) {
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_space(smmu, &llq))
+ dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ }
+
+ head.val = llq.val;
+ queue_inc_prod(&head);
+ owner = !(llq.prod & CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG);
+ if (owner)
+ head.prod |= CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG;
+ } while (cmpxchg_relaxed(&cmdq->q.llq.val, llq.val, head.val) != llq.val);
+
+ /*
+ * 2. Write our command into the queue
+ * Dependency ordering from the cmpxchg() loop above.
+ */
+ if (sync && ent->sync.msi)
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_cmd_set_msi_addr(cmd, cmdq, llq.prod);
+ queue_write(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq.prod), cmd, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS);
+
+ /*
+ * In order to determine completion of our CMD_SYNC, we must ensure
+ * that the queue can't wrap twice without us noticing. We achieve that
+ * by taking the cmdq lock as shared before marking our slot as valid.
+ */
+ if (sync)
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_lock(cmdq);
+
+ /* 3. Mark our slot as valid, ensuring command is visible first */
+ dma_wmb();
+ change_bit(Q_IDX(&llq, llq.prod), cmdq->valid_map);
+
+ /* 4. If we are the owner, take control of the SMMU hardware */
+ if (owner) {
+ u32 prod;
- arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, &ent);
+ /* a. Wait for previous owner to finish */
+ atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&cmdq->owner_prod, VAL == llq.prod);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
- arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
- ret = queue_poll_cons(&smmu->cmdq.q, true, wfe);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
+ /* b. Stop gathering work by clearing the owned flag */
+ prod = atomic_fetch_andnot_relaxed(CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG,
+ &cmdq->q.llq.atomic.prod);
+ prod &= ~CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG;
+ head.prod &= ~CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG;
+ /* c. Wait for any gathered work to be written to the queue */
+ if (head.prod != prod)
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(cmdq, llq.prod, prod);
+
+ /*
+ * d. Advance the hardware prod pointer
+ * Control dependency ordering from the entries becoming valid.
+ */
+ writel_relaxed(prod, cmdq->q.prod_reg);
+
+ /*
+ * e. Tell the next owner we're done
+ * Make sure we've updated the hardware first, so that we don't
+ * race to update prod and potentially move it backwards.
+ */
+ atomic_set_release(&cmdq->owner_prod, prod);
+ }
+
+ /* 5. If we are inserting a CMD_SYNC, we must wait for it to complete */
+ if (sync) {
+ ret = ent->sync.msi ?
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(smmu, &llq) :
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(smmu, &llq);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
+ "CMD_SYNC %s timeout [hwprod 0x%08x, hwcons 0x%08x]\n",
+ ent->sync.msi ? "MSI" : "polling",
+ readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.prod_reg),
+ readl_relaxed(cmdq->q.cons_reg));
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Try to unlock the cmq lock. This will fail if we're the last
+ * reader, in which case we can safely update cmdq->q.llq.cons
+ */
+ if (!arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_tryunlock(cmdq)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.cons, llq.cons);
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_shared_unlock(cmdq);
+ }
+ }
+
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
return ret;
}
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
- int ret;
- bool msi = (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI) &&
- (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY);
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = {
+ .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC,
+ .sync.msi = (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI) &&
+ (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY),
+ };
- ret = msi ? __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(smmu)
- : __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(smmu);
- if (ret)
- dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMD_SYNC timeout\n");
- return ret;
+ return arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &ent);
}
/* Context descriptor manipulation functions */
@@ -1581,9 +1847,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie)
/*
* NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with
* PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible
- * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in
- * queue_sync_prod_out() to guarantee those are observed before the
- * TLBI. Do be careful, 007.
+ * to the SMMU. We are relying on the dma_wmb() implicit during cmd
+ * insertion to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be
+ * careful, 007.
*/
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &cmd);
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(smmu);
@@ -2330,18 +2596,49 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_one_queue(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return 0;
}
+static void arm_smmu_cmdq_free_bitmap(void *data)
+{
+ unsigned long *bitmap = data;
+ bitmap_free(bitmap);
+}
+
+static int arm_smmu_cmdq_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ unsigned int nents = 1 << cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift;
+ unsigned long *bitmap;
+
+ atomic_set(&cmdq->owner_prod, 0);
+ atomic_set(&cmdq->lock, 0);
+
+ bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(nents, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!bitmap) {
+ dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to allocate cmdq bitmap\n");
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ } else {
+ cmdq->valid_map = bitmap;
+ devm_add_action(smmu->dev, arm_smmu_cmdq_free_bitmap, bitmap);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int arm_smmu_init_queues(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
int ret;
/* cmdq */
- spin_lock_init(&smmu->cmdq.lock);
ret = arm_smmu_init_one_queue(smmu, &smmu->cmdq.q, ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_PROD,
ARM_SMMU_CMDQ_CONS, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS,
"cmdq");
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = arm_smmu_cmdq_init(smmu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
/* evtq */
ret = arm_smmu_init_one_queue(smmu, &smmu->evtq.q, ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_PROD,
ARM_SMMU_EVTQ_CONS, EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS,
@@ -2922,9 +3219,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
/* Queue sizes, capped to ensure natural alignment */
smmu->cmdq.q.llq.max_n_shift = min_t(u32, CMDQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT,
FIELD_GET(IDR1_CMDQS, reg));
- if (!smmu->cmdq.q.llq.max_n_shift) {
- /* Odd alignment restrictions on the base, so ignore for now */
- dev_err(smmu->dev, "unit-length command queue not supported\n");
+ if (smmu->cmdq.q.llq.max_n_shift < ilog2(BITS_PER_LONG)) {
+ /*
+ * The cmdq valid_map relies on the total number of entries
+ * being a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG. There's also no way
+ * we can handle the weird alignment restrictions on the
+ * base pointer for a unit-length queue.
+ */
+ dev_err(smmu->dev, "command queue size < %d entries not supported\n",
+ ilog2(BITS_PER_LONG));
return -ENXIO;
}
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion Will Deacon
@ 2019-06-17 13:38 ` John Garry
2019-06-17 18:15 ` Will Deacon
6 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2019-06-17 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon, iommu
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
On 11/06/2019 14:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series is an attempt to reduce lock contention when inserting
> commands into the Arm SMMUv3 command queue. Unfortunately, our initial
> benchmarking has shown mixed results across the board and the changes in
> the last patch don't appear to justify their complexity. Based on that,
> I only plan to queue the first patch for the time being.
>
> Anyway, before I park this series, I thought it was probably worth
> sharing it in case it's useful to somebody. If you have a system where
> you believe I/O performance to be limited by the SMMUv3 command queue
> then please try these patches and let me know what happens, even if it's
> just more bad news.
>
> Patches based on 5.2-rc3. I've also pushed them out to my iommu/devel
> branch for the moment:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=iommu/devel
>
Hi Will,
For command queue lock contention, we had this series previously:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/61b4c3e5f1322dfe96ca2062a7fe058298340996.1539782799.git.robin.murphy@arm.com/#t
I am just wondering does this have any future?
IIRC we only tested the v3 of the series on a board which does not
support msi.
Thanks,
john
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair <jnair@marvell.com>
> Cc: Jan Glauber <jglauber@marvell.com>
> Cc: Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Vijay Kilary <vkilari@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
>
> Will Deacon (6):
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase maximum size of queues
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible
> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion
>
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 725 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 534 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue
2019-06-17 13:38 ` [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue John Garry
@ 2019-06-17 18:15 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-06-17 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Garry
Cc: Vijay Kilary, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jon Masters, Jan Glauber,
iommu, Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair, Robin Murphy
Hi John,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:38:59PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 11/06/2019 14:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series is an attempt to reduce lock contention when inserting
> > commands into the Arm SMMUv3 command queue. Unfortunately, our initial
> > benchmarking has shown mixed results across the board and the changes in
> > the last patch don't appear to justify their complexity. Based on that,
> > I only plan to queue the first patch for the time being.
> >
> > Anyway, before I park this series, I thought it was probably worth
> > sharing it in case it's useful to somebody. If you have a system where
> > you believe I/O performance to be limited by the SMMUv3 command queue
> > then please try these patches and let me know what happens, even if it's
> > just more bad news.
> >
> > Patches based on 5.2-rc3. I've also pushed them out to my iommu/devel
> > branch for the moment:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=iommu/devel
> >
>
> For command queue lock contention, we had this series previously:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/61b4c3e5f1322dfe96ca2062a7fe058298340996.1539782799.git.robin.murphy@arm.com/#t
>
> I am just wondering does this have any future?
The functionality of that series is subsumed by the patches I've posted
here, although if I can't get the cmpxchg() loop working well here then
we could revisit just making the change proposed by Robin. The problem is
that we'll still have serialisation on access to the command queue, and
therefore it will remain a scalability bottleneck as long as the fast-path
needs to queue for a lock.
However, I've still got a few tricks up my sleeve so I'm hoping to get a
new version of this lot out in the coming weeks.
Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread