IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/22] iommu: Introduce device fault report API
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:41:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20190618164158.0000489c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560087862-57608-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 06:44:03 -0700
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Traditionally, device specific faults are detected and handled within
> their own device drivers. When IOMMU is enabled, faults such as DMA
> related transactions are detected by IOMMU. There is no generic
> reporting mechanism to report faults back to the in-kernel device
> driver or the guest OS in case of assigned devices.
> 
> This patch introduces a registration API for device specific fault
> handlers. This differs from the existing iommu_set_fault_handler/
> report_iommu_fault infrastructures in several ways:
> - it allows to report more sophisticated fault events (both
>   unrecoverable faults and page request faults) due to the nature
>   of the iommu_fault struct
> - it is device specific and not domain specific.
> 
> The current iommu_report_device_fault() implementation only handles
> the "shoot and forget" unrecoverable fault case. Handling of page
> request faults or stalled faults will come later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

A few nitpicks and minor suggestions inline.

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/iommu.h |  33 ++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 67ee662..7955184 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -644,6 +644,13 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
>  		goto err_free_name;
>  	}
>  
> +	dev->iommu_param = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->iommu_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dev->iommu_param) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_free_name;
> +	}
> +	mutex_init(&dev->iommu_param->lock);
> +
>  	kobject_get(group->devices_kobj);
>  
>  	dev->iommu_group = group;
> @@ -674,6 +681,7 @@ int iommu_group_add_device(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
>  	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
>  	dev->iommu_group = NULL;
>  	kobject_put(group->devices_kobj);
> +	kfree(dev->iommu_param);
>  err_free_name:
>  	kfree(device->name);
>  err_remove_link:
> @@ -720,7 +728,7 @@ void iommu_group_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>  	sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "iommu_group");
>  
>  	trace_remove_device_from_group(group->id, dev);
> -
> +	kfree(dev->iommu_param);
>  	kfree(device->name);
>  	kfree(device);
>  	dev->iommu_group = NULL;
> @@ -855,6 +863,123 @@ int iommu_group_unregister_notifier(struct iommu_group *group,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_group_unregister_notifier);
>  
>  /**
> + * iommu_register_device_fault_handler() - Register a device fault handler
> + * @dev: the device
> + * @handler: the fault handler
> + * @data: private data passed as argument to the handler
> + *
> + * When an IOMMU fault event is received, this handler gets called with the
> + * fault event and data as argument.
> + *
> + * Return 0 if the fault handler was installed successfully, or an error.
> + */
> +int iommu_register_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev,
> +					iommu_dev_fault_handler_t handler,
> +					void *data)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_param *param = dev->iommu_param;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Device iommu_param should have been allocated when device is
> +	 * added to its iommu_group.
> +	 */
> +	if (!param)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> +	/* Only allow one fault handler registered for each device */
> +	if (param->fault_param) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto done_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	get_device(dev);
> +	param->fault_param =
> +		kzalloc(sizeof(struct iommu_fault_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!param->fault_param) {
> +		put_device(dev);
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto done_unlock;
> +	}
> +	param->fault_param->handler = handler;
> +	param->fault_param->data = data;
> +
> +done_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_register_device_fault_handler);
> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler() - Unregister the device fault handler
> + * @dev: the device
> + *
> + * Remove the device fault handler installed with
> + * iommu_register_device_fault_handler().
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, or an error.
> + */
> +int iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_param *param = dev->iommu_param;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!param)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> +
> +	if (!param->fault_param)
> +		goto unlock;
> +
> +	kfree(param->fault_param);
> +	param->fault_param = NULL;
> +	put_device(dev);
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler);
> +

One blank line probably enough.. (my personal favourite
stylistic nitpick ;)

> +
> +/**
> + * iommu_report_device_fault() - Report fault event to device
> + * @dev: the device
> + * @evt: fault event data
> + *
> + * Called by IOMMU drivers when a fault is detected, typically in a threaded IRQ
> + * handler.

What constraints does that put on it?  We probably don't care about the
fact it is in a threaded irq as such, rather something that is true as
a result of that?

> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, or an error.
> + */
> +int iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fault_event *evt)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_param *param = dev->iommu_param;
> +	struct iommu_fault_param *fparam;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* iommu_param is allocated when device is added to group */
> +	if (!param || !evt)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* we only report device fault if there is a handler registered */
> +	mutex_lock(&param->lock);
> +	fparam = param->fault_param;
> +	if (!fparam || !fparam->handler) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto done_unlock;
> +	}
> +	ret = fparam->handler(evt, fparam->data);
> +done_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&param->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_report_device_fault);
> +
> +/**
>   * iommu_group_id - Return ID for a group
>   * @group: the group to ID
>   *
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 7890a92..b87b74c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -322,9 +322,9 @@ struct iommu_fault_event {
>  
>  /**
>   * struct iommu_fault_param - per-device IOMMU fault data
> - * @dev_fault_handler: Callback function to handle IOMMU faults at device level
> - * @data: handler private data
>   *
> + * @handler: Callback function to handle IOMMU faults at device level

This should be in the previous patch, not this one.

> + * @data: handler private data
>   */
>  struct iommu_fault_param {
>  	iommu_dev_fault_handler_t handler;
> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ struct iommu_fault_param {
>   *	struct iommu_fwspec	*iommu_fwspec;
>   */
>  struct iommu_param {
> +	struct mutex lock;

Structure has kernel doc so this should be added to that.

>  	struct iommu_fault_param *fault_param;
>  };
>  
> @@ -433,6 +434,15 @@ extern int iommu_group_register_notifier(struct iommu_group *group,
>  					 struct notifier_block *nb);
>  extern int iommu_group_unregister_notifier(struct iommu_group *group,
>  					   struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int iommu_register_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev,
> +					iommu_dev_fault_handler_t handler,
> +					void *data);
> +
> +extern int iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev);
> +
> +extern int iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev,
> +				     struct iommu_fault_event *evt);
> +
>  extern int iommu_group_id(struct iommu_group *group);
>  extern struct iommu_group *iommu_group_get_for_dev(struct device *dev);
>  extern struct iommu_domain *iommu_group_default_domain(struct iommu_group *);
> @@ -741,6 +751,25 @@ static inline int iommu_group_unregister_notifier(struct iommu_group *group,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline
> +int iommu_register_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev,
> +					iommu_dev_fault_handler_t handler,
> +					void *data)
> +{
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +int iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fault_event *evt)
> +{
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int iommu_group_id(struct iommu_group *group)
>  {
>  	return -ENODEV;


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply index

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-09 13:44 [PATCH v4 00/22] Shared virtual address IOMMU and VT-d support Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] driver core: Add per device iommu param Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] iommu: Introduce device fault data Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] iommu: Introduce device fault report API Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:41   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] iommu: Add recoverable fault reporting Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] iommu: Add a timeout parameter for PRQ response Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] trace/iommu: Add sva trace events Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] iommu: Use device fault trace event Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:41   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 15:06     ` Auger Eric
2019-06-24 15:23       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:41   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] iommu: Fix compile error without IOMMU_API Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 14:10   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 22:28     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] iommu: Introduce guest PASID bind function Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:36   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-06-24 22:24     ` Jacob Pan
2019-07-16 16:44   ` Auger Eric
2019-08-05 21:02     ` Jacob Pan
2019-08-05 23:13     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] iommu: Add I/O ASID allocator Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 16:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-25 18:55     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] iommu/vt-d: Enlightened PASID allocation Jacob Pan
2019-07-16  9:29   ` Auger Eric
2019-08-13 16:57     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID Jacob Pan
2019-07-16  9:30   ` Auger Eric
2019-08-05 20:02     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] iommu/vt-d: Replace Intel specific PASID allocator with IOASID Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 15:57   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 21:36     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-27  1:53   ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-27 15:40     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] iommu/vt-d: Move domain helper to header Jacob Pan
2019-07-16  9:33   ` Auger Eric
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] iommu/vt-d: Avoid duplicated code for PASID setup Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 16:03   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 23:44     ` Jacob Pan
2019-07-16  9:52   ` Auger Eric
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] iommu/vt-d: Add nested translation helper function Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] iommu/vt-d: Clean up for SVM device list Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 16:42   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 23:59     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Jacob Pan
2019-06-18 16:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 22:41     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-27  2:50   ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-27 20:22     ` Jacob Pan
2019-07-05  2:21       ` Lu Baolu
2019-08-14 17:20         ` Jacob Pan
2019-07-16 16:45   ` Auger Eric
2019-07-16 17:04     ` Raj, Ashok
2019-07-18  7:47       ` Auger Eric
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] iommu/vt-d: Support flushing more translation cache types Jacob Pan
2019-07-18  8:35   ` Auger Eric
2019-08-14 20:17     ` Jacob Pan
2019-06-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function Jacob Pan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-18 13:54 [PATCH v4 00/22] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup Eric Auger
2019-02-18 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] iommu: introduce device fault report API Eric Auger
2019-03-05 15:03   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-03-06 23:46     ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-07 11:42       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190618164158.0000489c@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/0 linux-iommu/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-iommu linux-iommu/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu \
		iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org iommu@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-iommu

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox