From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188F2C76195 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D576C2173E for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D576C2173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAF9E57; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 211BFD88 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FF38DC for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6ICvbKb059772 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:01:33 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2tts6hg8gp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:01:33 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:01:31 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:01:26 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x6ID1O1I46399696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:24 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CC511C04C; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B18911C04A; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc2783563651 (unknown [9.152.224.219]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:01:23 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function In-Reply-To: <20190718084456.GE24562@lst.de> References: <20190718032858.28744-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190718032858.28744-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190718084456.GE24562@lst.de> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19071813-0028-0000-0000-00000385B410 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19071813-0029-0000-0000-00002445DDD0 Message-Id: <20190718150123.4230a00c.pasic@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-18_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=986 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1907180135 Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Mike Anderson , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Robin Murphy , x86@kernel.org, Ram Pai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Lendacky , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexey Dobriyan X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:44:56 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */ > > -bool sev_active(void) > > -{ > > - return is_prot_virt_guest(); > > -} > > - > > bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) > > { > > - return sev_active(); > > + return is_prot_virt_guest(); > > } > > Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted? Yes we do. With the comment transferred: Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic > > Otherwise looks good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu