From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Vijay Kilary <vkilari@codeaurora.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Jan Glauber <jglauber@marvell.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair <jnair@marvell.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/19] iommu: Introduce struct iommu_iotlb_gather for batching TLB flushes
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:58:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190725075838.GB16597@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724074129.6pkcmutsoazrrklq@willie-the-truck>
Hi Will,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:41:30AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> There aren't tonnes of (direct) users of the iommu-api, and the additional
> complexity introduced by the 'struct iotlb_gather' only applies to users of
> iommu_unmap_fast(), which I think is a reasonable trade-off in return for
> the potential for improved performance.
Yeah, that is right. From a scalability point of view this is much
better and easier than keeping 'struct iotlb_gather' in the
iommu_domain.
Thanks for the explanation.
Regards,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-11 17:19 [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/19] iommu: Remove empty iommu_tlb_range_add() callback from iommu_ops Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/19] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Remove redundant call to io_pgtable_tlb_sync() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Rename iommu_gather_ops to iommu_flush_ops Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/19] iommu: Introduce struct iommu_iotlb_gather for batching TLB flushes Will Deacon
2019-07-24 7:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2019-07-24 7:41 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-25 7:58 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/19] iommu: Introduce iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/19] iommu: Pass struct iommu_iotlb_gather to ->unmap() and ->iotlb_sync() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Introduce tlb_flush_walk() and tlb_flush_leaf() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Hook up ->tlb_flush_walk() and ->tlb_flush_leaf() in drivers Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/19] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Call ->tlb_flush_walk() and ->tlb_flush_leaf() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Replace ->tlb_add_flush() with ->tlb_add_page() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Remove unused ->tlb_sync() callback Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Pass struct iommu_iotlb_gather to ->unmap() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/19] iommu/io-pgtable: Pass struct iommu_iotlb_gather to ->tlb_add_page() Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible Will Deacon
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion Will Deacon
2019-07-19 11:04 ` John Garry
2019-07-24 12:15 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:03 ` John Garry
2019-07-24 14:07 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 8:20 ` John Garry
2019-07-24 14:33 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-25 11:31 ` John Garry
2019-07-11 17:19 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Defer TLB invalidation until ->iotlb_sync() Will Deacon
2019-07-19 4:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2019-07-24 12:28 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 9:58 ` John Garry
2019-07-24 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-24 14:25 ` John Garry
2019-07-24 14:48 ` Will Deacon
2019-07-25 10:11 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190725075838.GB16597@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=jglauber@marvell.com \
--cc=jnair@marvell.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vkilari@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).