iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: document the choice of page attributes for pgprot_dmacoherent
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:31:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190816173118.4rbbzuogfamfa554@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190816070754.15653-7-hch@lst.de>

Hi Christoph,

Thanks for spinning this into a patch.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 09:07:54AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Based on an email from Will Deacon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 6700371227d1..6ff221d9a631 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -435,6 +435,14 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_mkdevmap(pmd_t pmd)
>  	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
>  #define pgprot_device(prot) \
>  	__pgprot_modify(prot, PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRE) | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
> +/*
> + * DMA allocations for non-coherent devices use what the Arm architecture calls
> + * "Normal non-cacheable" memory, which permits speculation, unaligned accesses
> + * and merging of writes.  This is different from "Strongly Ordered" memory
> + * which is intended for MMIO and thus forbids speculation, preserves access
> + * size, requires strict alignment and also forces write responses to come from
> + * the endpoint.
> + */

Mind if I tweak the second sentence to be:

  This is different from "Device-nGnR[nE]" memory which is intended for MMIO
  and thus forbids speculation, preserves access size, requires strict
  alignment and can also force write responses to come from the endpoint.

? It's a small change, but it better fits with the arm64 terminology
("strongly ordered" is no longer used in the architecture).

If you're happy with that, I can make the change and queue this patch
for 5.4.

Thanks,

Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-16 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-16  7:07 cleanup the dma_pgprot handling Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: remove support for DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] unicore32: remove the unused pgprot_dmacoherent define Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm-nommu: " Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] dma-mapping: remove arch_dma_mmap_pgprot Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:43   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-16  7:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] dma-mapping: make dma_atomic_pool_init self-contained Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16  7:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: document the choice of page attributes for pgprot_dmacoherent Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 17:31   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-08-16 17:36     ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-16 17:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-16 18:05       ` Will Deacon
2019-08-23 21:58 ` cleanup the dma_pgprot handling Paul Burton
2019-08-24 22:34   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190816173118.4rbbzuogfamfa554@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gxt@pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn@anastas.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).