IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: andmike@us.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, jasowang@redhat.com, aik@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, paulus@ozlabs.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, paul.burton@mips.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	hch@lst.de, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Add dma_addr_is_phys_addr()
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:51:39 +1100
Message-ID: <20191014045139.GN4080@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570843519-8696-2-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5219 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:25:18PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> In order to safely use the DMA API, virtio needs to know whether DMA
> addresses are in fact physical addresses and for that purpose,
> dma_addr_is_phys_addr() is introduced.
> 
> cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
> cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@linux.ibm.com>
> cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
> cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

The change itself looks ok, so

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

However, I would like to see the commit message (and maybe the inline
comments) expanded a bit on what the distinction here is about.  Some
of the text from the next patch would be suitable, about DMA addresses
usually being in a different address space but not in the case of
bounce buffering.

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig |  1 +
>  include/linux/dma-mapping.h            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/dma/Kconfig                     |  3 +++
>  4 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index 565d6f7..f92c0a4b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H
>  #define _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H
>  
> +#include <asm/svm.h>
> +
>  static inline const struct dma_map_ops *get_arch_dma_ops(struct bus_type *bus)
>  {
>  	/* We don't handle the NULL dev case for ISA for now. We could
> @@ -15,4 +17,23 @@ static inline const struct dma_map_ops *get_arch_dma_ops(struct bus_type *bus)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
> +/**
> + * dma_addr_is_phys_addr - check whether a device DMA address is a physical
> + *		address
> + * @dev:	device to check
> + *
> + * Returns %true if any DMA address for this device happens to also be a valid
> + * physical address (not necessarily of the same page).
> + */
> +static inline bool dma_addr_is_phys_addr(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Secure guests always use the SWIOTLB, therefore DMA addresses are
> +	 * actually the physical address of the bounce buffer.
> +	 */
> +	return is_secure_guest();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif	/* _ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> index 9e35cdd..0108150 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ config PPC_SVM
>  	select SWIOTLB
>  	select ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT
>  	select ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
> +	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
>  	help
>  	 There are certain POWER platforms which support secure guests using
>  	 the Protected Execution Facility, with the help of an Ultravisor
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> index f7d1eea..6df5664 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -693,6 +693,26 @@ static inline bool dma_addressing_limited(struct device *dev)
>  			    dma_get_required_mask(dev);
>  }
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
> +/**
> + * dma_addr_is_phys_addr - check whether a device DMA address is a physical
> + *		address
> + * @dev:	device to check
> + *
> + * Returns %true if any DMA address for this device happens to also be a valid
> + * physical address (not necessarily of the same page).
> + */
> +static inline bool dma_addr_is_phys_addr(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Except in very specific setups, DMA addresses exist in a different
> +	 * address space from CPU physical addresses and cannot be directly used
> +	 * to reference system memory.
> +	 */
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
>  void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>  		const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent);
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
> index 9decbba..6209b46 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ config ARCH_HAS_DMA_MMAP_PGPROT
>  config ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
>  	bool
>  
> +config ARCH_HAS_DMA_ADDR_IS_PHYS_ADDR
> +	bool
> +
>  config DMA_NONCOHERENT_CACHE_SYNC
>  	bool
>  

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-12  1:25 [PATCH 0/2] virtio: Support encrypted memory on powerpc secure guests Ram Pai
2019-10-12  1:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Add dma_addr_is_phys_addr() Ram Pai
2019-10-12  1:25   ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio_ring: Use DMA API if memory is encrypted Ram Pai
2019-10-14  4:52     ` David Gibson
2019-10-15  7:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-16  7:55       ` Ram Pai
2019-10-17  2:33       ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21  8:36       ` David Gibson
2019-10-14  4:51   ` David Gibson [this message]
2019-10-14 10:29     ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: Add dma_addr_is_phys_addr() Robin Murphy
2019-10-15  7:30       ` Ram Pai
2019-10-15  7:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-12  1:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] virtio: Support encrypted memory on powerpc secure guests Ram Pai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191014045139.GN4080@umbus.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=aik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/0 linux-iommu/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-iommu linux-iommu/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu \
		iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
	public-inbox-index linux-iommu

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git