iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:41:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204094159.7b3e4100@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6ff346e-6b6b-d9cd-c7c8-0e54614c1b37@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:32:17 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Jacob,
> 
> On 12/4/19 12:50 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:44:45 +0800
> > Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi Jacob,
> >>
> >> On 12/3/19 4:02 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:  
> >>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:04:44 +0800
> >>> Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
> >>>      
> >>>> Intel VT-d 3.0 introduces more caches and interfaces for software
> >>>> to flush when it runs in the scalable mode. Currently various
> >>>> cache flush helpers are scattered around. This consolidates them
> >>>> by putting them in the existing iommu_flush structure.
> >>>>
> >>>> /* struct iommu_flush - Intel IOMMU cache invalidation ops
> >>>>    *
> >>>>    * @cc_inv: invalidate context cache
> >>>>    * @iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches
> >>>> when software
> >>>>    *             has changed second-level tables.
> >>>>    * @p_iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches
> >>>> when software
> >>>>    *               has changed first-level tables.
> >>>>    * @pc_inv: invalidate pasid cache
> >>>>    * @dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by
> >>>> requests-without-PASID
> >>>>    *               from the Device-TLB on a endpoint device.
> >>>>    * @p_dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by
> >>>> requests-with-PASID
> >>>>    *                 from the Device-TLB on an endpoint device
> >>>>    */
> >>>> struct iommu_flush {
> >>>>           void (*cc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> >>>>                          u16 sid, u8 fm, u64 type);
> >>>>           void (*iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> >>>> u64 addr, unsigned int size_order, u64 type);
> >>>>           void (*p_iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> >>>> u32 pasid, u64 addr, unsigned long npages, bool ih);
> >>>>           void (*pc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u32
> >>>> pasid, u64 granu);
> >>>>           void (*dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid,
> >>>> u16 pfsid, u16 qdep, u64 addr, unsigned int mask);
> >>>>           void (*p_dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16
> >>>> sid, u16 pfsid, u32 pasid, u16 qdep, u64 addr,
> >>>>                                 unsigned long npages);
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> The name of each cache flush ops is defined according to the spec
> >>>> section 6.5 so that people are easy to look up them in the spec.
> >>>>     
> >>> Nice consolidation. For nested SVM, I also introduced cache
> >>> flushed helpers as needed.
> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/24/857
> >>>
> >>> Should I wait for yours to be merged or you want to extend the
> >>> this consolidation after SVA/SVM cache flush? I expect to send my
> >>> v8 shortly.  
> >>
> >> Please base your v8 patch on this series. So it could get more
> >> chances for test.
> >>  
> > Sounds good.  
> 
> I am sorry I need to spend more time on this patch series. Please go
> ahead without it.
> 
NP, let me know when you need testing.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-22  3:04 [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] iommu/vt-d: Extend iommu_flush for scalable mode Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate pasid cache invalidation Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate device tlb invalidation Lu Baolu
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate pasid-based " Lu Baolu
2019-12-03 17:43   ` Jacob Pan
2019-11-22  3:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate pasid-based device " Lu Baolu
2019-12-02 20:02 ` [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops Jacob Pan
2019-12-03  2:44   ` Lu Baolu
2019-12-03 16:50     ` Jacob Pan
2019-12-04  0:32       ` Lu Baolu
2019-12-04 17:41         ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2019-12-03  8:49 ` David Woodhouse
2019-12-04  0:27   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191204094159.7b3e4100@jacob-builder \
    --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).