From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7F4C43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518A720803 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 518A720803 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2CA86F41; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g2i6AFzPQUhz; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2DA86F40; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BCAC18DD; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934D9C077D for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EF086F41 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nCOnlyrXY-V for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92FF86F40 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:37:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2019 09:37:16 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,278,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="223306093" Received: from jacob-builder.jf.intel.com (HELO jacob-builder) ([10.7.199.155]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2019 09:37:15 -0800 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:41:59 -0800 From: Jacob Pan To: Lu Baolu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops Message-ID: <20191204094159.7b3e4100@jacob-builder> In-Reply-To: References: <20191122030449.28892-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20191202120252.45606c47@jacob-builder> <20191203085026.1785292b@jacob-builder> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Woodhouse X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:32:17 +0800 Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Jacob, > > On 12/4/19 12:50 AM, Jacob Pan wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:44:45 +0800 > > Lu Baolu wrote: > > > >> Hi Jacob, > >> > >> On 12/3/19 4:02 AM, Jacob Pan wrote: > >>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:04:44 +0800 > >>> Lu Baolu wrote: > >>> > >>>> Intel VT-d 3.0 introduces more caches and interfaces for software > >>>> to flush when it runs in the scalable mode. Currently various > >>>> cache flush helpers are scattered around. This consolidates them > >>>> by putting them in the existing iommu_flush structure. > >>>> > >>>> /* struct iommu_flush - Intel IOMMU cache invalidation ops > >>>> * > >>>> * @cc_inv: invalidate context cache > >>>> * @iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches > >>>> when software > >>>> * has changed second-level tables. > >>>> * @p_iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches > >>>> when software > >>>> * has changed first-level tables. > >>>> * @pc_inv: invalidate pasid cache > >>>> * @dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by > >>>> requests-without-PASID > >>>> * from the Device-TLB on a endpoint device. > >>>> * @p_dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by > >>>> requests-with-PASID > >>>> * from the Device-TLB on an endpoint device > >>>> */ > >>>> struct iommu_flush { > >>>> void (*cc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, > >>>> u16 sid, u8 fm, u64 type); > >>>> void (*iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, > >>>> u64 addr, unsigned int size_order, u64 type); > >>>> void (*p_iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, > >>>> u32 pasid, u64 addr, unsigned long npages, bool ih); > >>>> void (*pc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u32 > >>>> pasid, u64 granu); > >>>> void (*dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, > >>>> u16 pfsid, u16 qdep, u64 addr, unsigned int mask); > >>>> void (*p_dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 > >>>> sid, u16 pfsid, u32 pasid, u16 qdep, u64 addr, > >>>> unsigned long npages); > >>>> }; > >>>> > >>>> The name of each cache flush ops is defined according to the spec > >>>> section 6.5 so that people are easy to look up them in the spec. > >>>> > >>> Nice consolidation. For nested SVM, I also introduced cache > >>> flushed helpers as needed. > >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/24/857 > >>> > >>> Should I wait for yours to be merged or you want to extend the > >>> this consolidation after SVA/SVM cache flush? I expect to send my > >>> v8 shortly. > >> > >> Please base your v8 patch on this series. So it could get more > >> chances for test. > >> > > Sounds good. > > I am sorry I need to spend more time on this patch series. Please go > ahead without it. > NP, let me know when you need testing. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu