Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] PCI: Keep the ACS capability offset in device

From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Cc: Todd Broch <tbroch@google.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Krishnakumar,
	Lalithambika" <lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Diego Rivas <diegorivas@google.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Kellner <christian@kellner.me>,
	Mattias Nissler <mnissler@google.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>,
	Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Bernie Keany <bernie.keany@intel.com>,
	Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:AMD IOMMU \(AMD-VI\)"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@google.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Alex Levin <levinale@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] PCI: Keep the ACS capability offset in device
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 18:18:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200706231844.GA168946@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACK8Z6GtOH4o6J17YXnesf0VvQSQRTCR011RRD2U7gkrwA8ziQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 03:16:42PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:58 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:49:37PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:

> > > +static void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >
> > I don't think we need this forward declaration, do we?
> 
> We need it unless we move its definition further up in the file:
> 
> drivers/pci/pci.c: In function ‘pci_restore_state’:
> drivers/pci/pci.c:1551:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘pci_enable_acs’; did you mean ‘pci_enable_ats’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  1551 |  pci_enable_acs(dev);
> 
> Do you want me to move it up in the file so that we do not need the
> forward declaration?

Yes, please move it.  Maybe a preliminary patch that moves it but
doesn't change anything else.

I think I thought you had renamed the function, in which case you
could tell from the patch itself.  But I was mistaken!

> > > @@ -4653,7 +4653,7 @@ static int pci_quirk_intel_spt_pch_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
> > >       if (!pci_quirk_intel_spt_pch_acs_match(dev))
> > >               return -ENOTTY;
> > >
> > > -     pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS);
> > > +     pos = dev->acs_cap;
> >
> > I assume you verified that all these quirks are FINAL quirks, since
> > pci_init_capabilities() is called after HEADER quirks.  I'll
> > double-check before applying this.
> 
> None of these quirks are applied via DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_*(). All these
> quirks are called (directly or indirectly) from either
> pci_enable_acs() or pci_acs_enabled(),
> 
> EXCEPT
> 
> pci_idt_bus_quirk(). That one is called from
> pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() which should be called only after the
> parent bridge has been added and setup correctly.
> 
> So it looks all good to me.

Great, thanks for checking that.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu