From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio: type1: fix kthread use case
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:31:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200707003140.GA20022@joy-OptiPlex-7040> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200706104915.11460-1-hdanton@sina.com>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:49:15PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> It's incorrect to tell out if a task is kthread without checking
> PF_KTHREAD at all.
>
> What's also fixed, if no need to be in a seperate patch, is to
> invoke kthread_use_mm() without checking the current mm first as
> the kthread may hold a mm struct atm and it's not the right place
> to switch mm.
>
> Fixes: 8d46c0cca5f4 ("vfio: introduce vfio_dma_rw to read/write a range of IOVAs")
> Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> ---
>
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -2798,7 +2798,8 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dma_rw_chunk
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> unsigned long vaddr;
> struct vfio_dma *dma;
> - bool kthread = current->mm == NULL;
> + bool kthread = current->flags & PF_KTHREAD;
> + bool use_mm = current->mm == NULL;
is it acceptable to just rename "kthread" to "kthread_no_use_mm"?
I think "current->mm == NULL" in itself implies kthread and not use_mm,
as a user thread is not able to have "current->mm == NULL", right?
Thanks
Yan
> size_t offset;
>
> *copied = 0;
> @@ -2812,11 +2813,10 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dma_rw_chunk
> return -EPERM;
>
> mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
> -
> if (!mm)
> return -EPERM;
>
> - if (kthread)
> + if (kthread && use_mm)
> kthread_use_mm(mm);
> else if (current->mm != mm)
> goto out;
> @@ -2843,7 +2843,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dma_rw_chunk
> } else
> *copied = copy_from_user(data, (void __user *)vaddr,
> count) ? 0 : count;
> - if (kthread)
> + if (kthread && use_mm)
> kthread_unuse_mm(mm);
> out:
> mmput(mm);
> --
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-06 10:49 [RFC PATCH] vfio: type1: fix kthread use case Hillf Danton
2020-07-06 11:32 ` Markus Elfring
2020-07-06 12:42 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-06 13:33 ` Markus Elfring
2020-07-06 14:08 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-06 14:04 ` Markus Elfring
2020-07-07 1:14 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-07 6:04 ` Markus Elfring
2020-07-07 0:31 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2020-07-07 2:00 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200707003140.GA20022@joy-OptiPlex-7040 \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).