[PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for ACPI device in RMRR to access reserved memory

[PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for ACPI device in RMRR to access reserved memory

[FelixCuioc]

BIOS allocate reserved memory ranges that may be DMA targets.
BIOS may report each such reserved memory region through the
RMRR structures,along with the devices that requires access to
the specified reserved memory region.

The purpose of this series is to achieve ACPI device in RMRR
access reserved memory.Therefore,it is necessary to increase
the analysis of acpi device in RMRR and establish a mapping
for this device.

The first patch adds interfaces for detecting ACPI device in RMRR
and in order to distinguish it from pci device,some interface
functions are modified.

The second patch adds support for probing ACPI device in RMRR.
In probe_acpi_namespace_devices(),add support for direct mapping
of ACPI device and add support for physical node of acpi device
to be NULL.

The last patch adds mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock)
before returning in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().

v1->v2:
   - Split the patch set to small series of patches
   - Move the processing of physical node of acpi device for NULL
     to probe_acpi_namespace_devices().
   - Add mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock) before returning
     in probe_acpi_namespace_devices().


FelixCuioc (3):
  iommu/vt-d:Add support for detecting ACPI device in RMRR
  iommu/vt-d:Add support for probing ACPI device in RMRR
  iommu/vt-d:Add mutex_unlock() before returning

 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c       |  6 +++
 include/linux/dmar.h        | 12 +++++-
 include/linux/iommu.h       |  3 ++
 5 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

[PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d:Add support for detecting ACPI device in RMRR

[FelixCuioc]

Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access
the reserved memory area.BIOS uses the device scope type
ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
This patch add support for detecting ACPI devices in RMRR.

Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc <FelixCui-oc@zhaoxin.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++-
 include/linux/dmar.h        | 12 +++++-
 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static bool dmar_match_pci_path(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info, int bus,
 }
 
 /* Return: > 0 if match found, 0 if no match found, < 0 if error happens */
-int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
+int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
 			  void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
 			  struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
 			  int devices_cnt)
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dmar_pci_bus_add_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
 
 		drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,
 				    struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit, header);
-		ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
+		ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
 				((void *)drhd) + drhd->header.length,
 				dmaru->segment,
 				dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt);
@@ -696,48 +696,56 @@ dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 	return dmaru;
 }
-
-static void __init dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
-					      struct acpi_device *adev)
+int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
+				struct acpi_device *adev,
+				void *start, void *end,
+				struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
+				int devices_cnt)
 {
-	struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
-	struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
 	struct acpi_dmar_device_scope *scope;
 	struct device *tmp;
 	int i;
 	struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *path;
 
+	for (; start < end; start += scope->length) {
+		scope = start;
+		if (scope->entry_type != ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_NAMESPACE)
+			continue;
+		if (scope->enumeration_id != device_number)
+			continue;
+		path = (void *)(scope + 1);
+		for_each_dev_scope(devices, devices_cnt, i, tmp)
+			if (tmp == NULL) {
+				devices[i].bus = scope->bus;
+				devices[i].devfn = PCI_DEVFN(path->device, path->function);
+				rcu_assign_pointer(devices[i].dev,
+						   get_device(&adev->dev));
+				return 1;
+			}
+		WARN_ON(i >= devices_cnt);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+static int dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev(u8 device_number, struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+	struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
+	struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
+	int ret = 0;
+
 	for_each_drhd_unit(dmaru) {
 		drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,
 				    struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit,
 				    header);
+		ret = dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(device_number, adev, (void *)(drhd+1),
+						((void *)drhd)+drhd->header.length,
+						dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+	ret = dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev(device_number, adev);
 
-		for (scope = (void *)(drhd + 1);
-		     (unsigned long)scope < ((unsigned long)drhd) + drhd->header.length;
-		     scope = ((void *)scope) + scope->length) {
-			if (scope->entry_type != ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_NAMESPACE)
-				continue;
-			if (scope->enumeration_id != device_number)
-				continue;
+	return ret;
 
-			path = (void *)(scope + 1);
-			pr_info("ACPI device \"%s\" under DMAR at %llx as %02x:%02x.%d\n",
-				dev_name(&adev->dev), dmaru->reg_base_addr,
-				scope->bus, path->device, path->function);
-			for_each_dev_scope(dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt, i, tmp)
-				if (tmp == NULL) {
-					dmaru->devices[i].bus = scope->bus;
-					dmaru->devices[i].devfn = PCI_DEVFN(path->device,
-									    path->function);
-					rcu_assign_pointer(dmaru->devices[i].dev,
-							   get_device(&adev->dev));
-					return;
-				}
-			BUG_ON(i >= dmaru->devices_cnt);
-		}
-	}
-	pr_warn("No IOMMU scope found for ANDD enumeration ID %d (%s)\n",
-		device_number, dev_name(&adev->dev));
 }
 
 static int __init dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init(void)
@@ -766,7 +774,7 @@ static int __init dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init(void)
 				       andd->device_name);
 				continue;
 			}
-			dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(andd->device_number, adev);
+			dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev(andd->device_number, adev);
 		}
 	}
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index ca557d351518..f774ef63d473 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4507,6 +4507,24 @@ int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 	return ret;
 }
+int dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev(u8 device_number, struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrru;
+	struct acpi_dmar_reserved_memory *rmrr;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &dmar_rmrr_units, list) {
+		rmrr = container_of(rmrru->hdr,
+				struct acpi_dmar_reserved_memory,
+				header);
+		ret = dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(device_number, adev, (void *)(rmrr + 1),
+						((void *)rmrr) + rmrr->header.length,
+						rmrru->devices, rmrru->devices_cnt);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
 
 int dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
 {
@@ -4523,7 +4541,7 @@ int dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
 		rmrr = container_of(rmrru->hdr,
 				    struct acpi_dmar_reserved_memory, header);
 		if (info->event == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE) {
-			ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(rmrr + 1),
+			ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(rmrr + 1),
 				((void *)rmrr) + rmrr->header.length,
 				rmrr->segment, rmrru->devices,
 				rmrru->devices_cnt);
@@ -4541,7 +4559,7 @@ int dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
 
 		atsr = container_of(atsru->hdr, struct acpi_dmar_atsr, header);
 		if (info->event == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE) {
-			ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(atsr + 1),
+			ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(atsr + 1),
 					(void *)atsr + atsr->header.length,
 					atsr->segment, atsru->devices,
 					atsru->devices_cnt);
diff --git a/include/linux/dmar.h b/include/linux/dmar.h
index 65565820328a..881ac61a4336 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmar.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmar.h
@@ -113,10 +113,14 @@ extern int dmar_parse_dev_scope(void *start, void *end, int *cnt,
 				struct dmar_dev_scope **devices, u16 segment);
 extern void *dmar_alloc_dev_scope(void *start, void *end, int *cnt);
 extern void dmar_free_dev_scope(struct dmar_dev_scope **devices, int *cnt);
-extern int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
+extern int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
 				 void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
 				 struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
 				 int devices_cnt);
+extern int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
+				struct acpi_device *adev, void *start, void *end,
+				struct dmar_dev_scope *devices, int devices_cnt);
+
 extern int dmar_remove_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
 				 u16 segment, struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
 				 int count);
@@ -140,6 +144,7 @@ extern int dmar_parse_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header, void *arg);
 extern int dmar_check_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_header *hdr, void *arg);
 extern int dmar_release_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_header *hdr, void *arg);
 extern int dmar_iommu_hotplug(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru, bool insert);
+extern int dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev(u8 device_number, struct acpi_device *adev);
 extern int dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info);
 #else /* !CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU: */
 static inline int intel_iommu_init(void) { return -ENODEV; }
@@ -150,6 +155,11 @@ static inline void intel_iommu_shutdown(void) { }
 #define	dmar_check_one_atsr		dmar_res_noop
 #define	dmar_release_one_atsr		dmar_res_noop
 
+static inline int dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev(u8 device_number, struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static inline int dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
 {
 	return 0;
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

[PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d:Add support for probing ACPI device in RMRR

[FelixCuioc]

After acpi device in RMRR is detected,it is necessary
to establish a mapping for these devices.
In acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(),create a mapping
for the acpi device in RMRR.
Add a helper to achieve the acpi namespace device can
access the RMRR region.

Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc <FelixCui-oc@zhaoxin.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c       |  6 ++++++
 include/linux/iommu.h       |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index f774ef63d473..b31f02f41c96 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4797,6 +4797,20 @@ static int __init platform_optin_force_iommu(void)
 
 	return 1;
 }
+static int acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(struct device *pn_dev, struct device *acpi_device)
+{
+	struct iommu_group *group;
+
+	acpi_device->bus->iommu_ops = &intel_iommu_ops;
+	group = iommu_group_get(pn_dev);
+	if (!group) {
+		pr_warn("ACPI name space devices create direct mappings wrong!\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	__acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(group, acpi_device);
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
 {
@@ -4812,6 +4826,7 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
 			struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
 			struct iommu_group *group;
 			struct acpi_device *adev;
+			struct device *pn_dev = NULL;
 
 			if (dev->bus != &acpi_bus_type)
 				continue;
@@ -4822,6 +4837,7 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
 					    &adev->physical_node_list, node) {
 				group = iommu_group_get(pn->dev);
 				if (group) {
+					pn_dev = pn->dev;
 					iommu_group_put(group);
 					continue;
 				}
@@ -4830,7 +4846,18 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
 				ret = iommu_probe_device(pn->dev);
 				if (ret)
 					break;
+				pn_dev = pn->dev;
+			}
+			if (pn_dev == NULL) {
+				dev->bus->iommu_ops = &intel_iommu_ops;
+				ret = iommu_probe_device(dev);
+				if (ret) {
+					pr_err("acpi_device probe fail! ret:%d\n", ret);
+					return ret;
+				}
+				return 0;
 			}
+			ret = acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(pn_dev, dev);
 			mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
 
 			if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 609bd25bf154..4f714a2d5ef7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -779,6 +779,12 @@ static bool iommu_is_attach_deferred(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 	return false;
 }
 
+void  __acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *acpi_device)
+{
+	iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(group, acpi_device);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__acpi_device_create_direct_mappings);
+
 /**
  * iommu_group_add_device - add a device to an iommu group
  * @group: the group into which to add the device (reference should be held)
diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
index fee209efb756..9be134775886 100644
--- a/include/linux/iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
@@ -514,6 +514,9 @@ extern void iommu_domain_window_disable(struct iommu_domain *domain, u32 wnd_nr)
 extern int report_iommu_fault(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
 			      unsigned long iova, int flags);
 
+extern void __acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group,
+						struct device *acpi_device);
+
 static inline void iommu_flush_tlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
 {
 	if (domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all)
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

[PATCH 3/3] iommu/vt-d:Add mutex_unlock() before returning

[FelixCuioc]

In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices function,when the physical
node of the acpi device is NULL,the unlock function is missing.
Add mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock).

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc <FelixCui-oc@zhaoxin.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index b31f02f41c96..25e9853cba1b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4851,6 +4851,7 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
 			if (pn_dev == NULL) {
 				dev->bus->iommu_ops = &intel_iommu_ops;
 				ret = iommu_probe_device(dev);
+				mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
 				if (ret) {
 					pr_err("acpi_device probe fail! ret:%d\n", ret);
 					return ret;
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d:Add support for detecting ACPI device in RMRR

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:27:50AM -0400, FelixCuioc wrote:
> Some ACPI devices need to issue dma requests to access
> the reserved memory area.BIOS uses the device scope type
> ACPI_NAMESPACE_DEVICE in RMRR to report these ACPI devices.
> This patch add support for detecting ACPI devices in RMRR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc <FelixCui-oc@zhaoxin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c  | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++-
>  include/linux/dmar.h        | 12 +++++-
>  3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> index 93e6345f3414..024ca38dba12 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static bool dmar_match_pci_path(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info, int bus,
>  }
>  
>  /* Return: > 0 if match found, 0 if no match found, < 0 if error happens */
> -int dmar_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
> +int dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info,
>  			  void *start, void*end, u16 segment,
>  			  struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
>  			  int devices_cnt)
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dmar_pci_bus_add_dev(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info)
>  
>  		drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,
>  				    struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit, header);
> -		ret = dmar_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
> +		ret = dmar_pci_insert_dev_scope(info, (void *)(drhd + 1),
>  				((void *)drhd) + drhd->header.length,
>  				dmaru->segment,
>  				dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt);
> @@ -696,48 +696,56 @@ dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  	return dmaru;
>  }
> -
> -static void __init dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,
> -					      struct acpi_device *adev)
> +int dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(u8 device_number,

The patch deleted the blank line between functions.  Make this function
bool, change the 1/0 to true/false.  Add a comment explaining what the
return values mean.

> +				struct acpi_device *adev,
> +				void *start, void *end,
> +				struct dmar_dev_scope *devices,
> +				int devices_cnt)
>  {
> -	struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
> -	struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
>  	struct acpi_dmar_device_scope *scope;
>  	struct device *tmp;
>  	int i;
>  	struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *path;
>  
> +	for (; start < end; start += scope->length) {
> +		scope = start;

Are we sure that there is enough space for sizeof(*scope) in end - start?
(I don't know this code so maybe we are).

> +		if (scope->entry_type != ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_NAMESPACE)
> +			continue;
> +		if (scope->enumeration_id != device_number)
> +			continue;
> +		path = (void *)(scope + 1);
> +		for_each_dev_scope(devices, devices_cnt, i, tmp)
> +			if (tmp == NULL) {
> +				devices[i].bus = scope->bus;
> +				devices[i].devfn = PCI_DEVFN(path->device, path->function);
> +				rcu_assign_pointer(devices[i].dev,
> +						   get_device(&adev->dev));
> +				return 1;
> +			}
> +		WARN_ON(i >= devices_cnt);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static int dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev(u8 device_number, struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> +	struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru;
> +	struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit *drhd;
> +	int ret = 0;

This initialization is never used.

> +
>  	for_each_drhd_unit(dmaru) {
>  		drhd = container_of(dmaru->hdr,
>  				    struct acpi_dmar_hardware_unit,
>  				    header);
> +		ret = dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(device_number, adev, (void *)(drhd+1),
> +						((void *)drhd)+drhd->header.length,
> +						dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	ret = dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev(device_number, adev);

What about if dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope() always returns zero, do we
still want to call dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev()?

>  
> -		for (scope = (void *)(drhd + 1);
> -		     (unsigned long)scope < ((unsigned long)drhd) + drhd->header.length;
> -		     scope = ((void *)scope) + scope->length) {
> -			if (scope->entry_type != ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_NAMESPACE)
> -				continue;
> -			if (scope->enumeration_id != device_number)
> -				continue;
> +	return ret;
>  
> -			path = (void *)(scope + 1);
> -			pr_info("ACPI device \"%s\" under DMAR at %llx as %02x:%02x.%d\n",
> -				dev_name(&adev->dev), dmaru->reg_base_addr,
> -				scope->bus, path->device, path->function);
> -			for_each_dev_scope(dmaru->devices, dmaru->devices_cnt, i, tmp)
> -				if (tmp == NULL) {
> -					dmaru->devices[i].bus = scope->bus;
> -					dmaru->devices[i].devfn = PCI_DEVFN(path->device,
> -									    path->function);
> -					rcu_assign_pointer(dmaru->devices[i].dev,
> -							   get_device(&adev->dev));
> -					return;
> -				}
> -			BUG_ON(i >= dmaru->devices_cnt);
> -		}
> -	}
> -	pr_warn("No IOMMU scope found for ANDD enumeration ID %d (%s)\n",
> -		device_number, dev_name(&adev->dev));
>  }
>  
>  static int __init dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init(void)
> @@ -766,7 +774,7 @@ static int __init dmar_acpi_dev_scope_init(void)
>  				       andd->device_name);
>  				continue;
>  			}
> -			dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(andd->device_number, adev);
> +			dmar_acpi_bus_add_dev(andd->device_number, adev);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index ca557d351518..f774ef63d473 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -4507,6 +4507,24 @@ int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +int dmar_rmrr_add_acpi_dev(u8 device_number, struct acpi_device *adev)

Please add a blank line between functions.
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrru;
> +	struct acpi_dmar_reserved_memory *rmrr;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(rmrru, &dmar_rmrr_units, list) {
> +		rmrr = container_of(rmrru->hdr,
> +				struct acpi_dmar_reserved_memory,
> +				header);
> +		ret = dmar_acpi_insert_dev_scope(device_number, adev, (void *)(rmrr + 1),
> +						((void *)rmrr) + rmrr->header.length,
> +						rmrru->devices, rmrru->devices_cnt);
> +		if (ret)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d:Add support for probing ACPI device in RMRR

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:27:51AM -0400, FelixCuioc wrote:
> After acpi device in RMRR is detected,it is necessary
> to establish a mapping for these devices.
> In acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(),create a mapping
> for the acpi device in RMRR.
> Add a helper to achieve the acpi namespace device can
> access the RMRR region.
> 
> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc <FelixCui-oc@zhaoxin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c       |  6 ++++++
>  include/linux/iommu.h       |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index f774ef63d473..b31f02f41c96 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -4797,6 +4797,20 @@ static int __init platform_optin_force_iommu(void)
>  
>  	return 1;
>  }
> +static int acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(struct device *pn_dev, struct device *acpi_device)

Blank line.

> +{
> +	struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> +	acpi_device->bus->iommu_ops = &intel_iommu_ops;
> +	group = iommu_group_get(pn_dev);
> +	if (!group) {
> +		pr_warn("ACPI name space devices create direct mappings wrong!\n");
> +		return -1;

Use a proper error code.  -ENOMEM?  -EINVAL?

> +	}
> +	__acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(group, acpi_device);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
>  static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
>  {
> @@ -4812,6 +4826,7 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
>  			struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
>  			struct iommu_group *group;
>  			struct acpi_device *adev;
> +			struct device *pn_dev = NULL;
>  
>  			if (dev->bus != &acpi_bus_type)
>  				continue;
> @@ -4822,6 +4837,7 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
>  					    &adev->physical_node_list, node) {
>  				group = iommu_group_get(pn->dev);
>  				if (group) {
> +					pn_dev = pn->dev;
>  					iommu_group_put(group);
>  					continue;
>  				}
> @@ -4830,7 +4846,18 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
>  				ret = iommu_probe_device(pn->dev);
>  				if (ret)
>  					break;
> +				pn_dev = pn->dev;
> +			}
> +			if (pn_dev == NULL) {

Run checkpatch.pl --strict on this patch.  Use "if (!pn_dev) {".

> +				dev->bus->iommu_ops = &intel_iommu_ops;
> +				ret = iommu_probe_device(dev);
> +				if (ret) {
> +					pr_err("acpi_device probe fail! ret:%d\n", ret);
> +					return ret;
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^
This should be goto unlock;

> +				}
> +				return 0;
                                ^^^^^^^^
>  			}
> +			ret = acpi_device_create_direct_mappings(pn_dev, dev);

unlock:

>  			mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/vt-d:Add mutex_unlock() before returning

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:27:52AM -0400, FelixCuioc wrote:
> In the probe_acpi_namespace_devices function,when the physical
> node of the acpi device is NULL,the unlock function is missing.
> Add mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock).
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: FelixCuioc <FelixCui-oc@zhaoxin.com>

Oh...  Crap.  I wondered why I was being CC'd on this patchset.  Just
fold this into the ealier patch.  Don't worry about the Reported-by.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu