From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53054C4727F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9ADC20709 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="kXLhM/c+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C9ADC20709 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A40A85F8B; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJCg8kL98iNN; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC2585F45; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D086C016F; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A28FC0051 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F948528B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWHDSZXelYoP for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from nat-hk.nvidia.com (nat-hk.nvidia.com [203.18.50.4]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1365E8452A for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HKMAIL101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[10.18.92.9]) by nat-hk.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:43:17 +0800 Received: from HKMAIL104.nvidia.com (10.18.16.13) by HKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.18.16.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:05 +0000 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.172) by HKMAIL104.nvidia.com (10.18.16.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:05 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JAHVpach2WYpBrX7bBNfX2SGGy1+cnUCSq0QPfO8RqEJnTo2B6aBwe+MSQ57TGv/981kRQojIBOoMt7yuMguw2Kp5woH1njWSncI8oDfknTIJwdqH2jRA7+wTCkP2+AQVZFwNCFDvCEj1IRJK7vP/GDgwCBNJnVdSdASsdxzPcB8HCqDxR+SLRetk5qcZiPK1nhaTg67XQO/dnLp1eUj8A8ErX0r8Z1kMGv0rd26MZZnTe1hl1UwuTpVA0Tvr23leGuf19KOjyx4ZsaJcJ2DT13mzmLSkXOc1Wkv2vOcA/qNFoGKrFBVmybOi4hngZMvkglRI8qybsbWfn2RFsHGjA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ifDjfXqbQdEToOzcs0qsNuogLb2HLWyKHTQc87/3Ewc=; b=GeC4vJWbfjTvUobe+GD7bOGykQaBOHH9lRECgxQuxmBz12RecnpK0daGWL/nq+UA1YjrfFHbvdi+geu9xiLDM2UFIseLWBWZYeg7EYre4CKvrFEJc/Jk0id23iLCbkpwZYjdydGccgoFaSWHhmQZekjrIUnXC6eA0yjnt5fIBL44pomxvYhSNTjTaU3GfCsB/VE3U6YoQ8JWlrPiQ9QxZC0NPmH308QDm1m2EkXgszZiBEFC/nbVG6lDlrUsipDlyAsmxlgi8wPzaI3NKn5QcGELBMWyX+7KDU2Xp7Jjn9IQWbfhb+rrutv5oJ0DZpRhhjf6na7Yl8Tjoo0tYcpwjg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nvidia.com; arc=none Received: from DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14a::12) by DM6PR12MB4546.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:2ae::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.32; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:02 +0000 Received: from DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdbe:f274:ad65:9a78]) by DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdbe:f274:ad65:9a78%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3433.032; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:43:01 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/46] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device MSI Message-ID: <20200930114301.GD816047@nvidia.com> References: <20200826111628.794979401@linutronix.de> <10b5d933-f104-7699-341a-0afb16640d54@intel.com> <87v9fvix5f.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9fvix5f.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> X-ClientProxiedBy: BL0PR02CA0003.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:3c::16) To DM6PR12MB3834.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:14a::12) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from mlx.ziepe.ca (156.34.48.30) by BL0PR02CA0003.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:3c::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3433.34 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:43:02 +0000 Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kNaVh-003vDf-1s; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:43:01 -0300 X-LD-Processed: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a,ExtAddr DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1601466197; bh=ifDjfXqbQdEToOzcs0qsNuogLb2HLWyKHTQc87/3Ewc=; h=ARC-Seal:ARC-Message-Signature:ARC-Authentication-Results:Date: From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:X-ClientProxiedBy:MIME-Version: X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType:X-LD-Processed; b=kXLhM/c+6HLgKm+6ble3lfNqOcCNe2qhFpXxYQ9VNpltIzypeid1VYh+BMxlOLlye 0+6VDWOyOvDf07+xZGAec4Wvn8k5WI3aiZoShq7j1qgKIq7qgusR0iXtwcLQk/xdjz +v2330h6r9nb93xOefwM7I/qvuhlV7upcanj1FwilxBqKMT7QRH5pMZ7ET2aXWd8p8 pK/mYHKsauGX6pIvk6Q2HPDPYGpXdDmMnGHCOc+5/StKJ5sjO489/p+d/uJSwbbRw0 QSJd7JK+1Rwde8F4fsYoj/S1iGRvpbBC/PZ0KlECf5FCeVBwjrsxHssfpqgfmeqxU4 fyKeGy0g3j+zQ== Cc: Dimitri Sivanich , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Steve Wahl , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Dan Williams , Wei Liu , Stephen Hemminger , Baolu Lu , Marc Zyngier , x86@kernel.org, "Dey, Megha" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, Kevin Tian , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Haiyang Zhang , Alex Williamson , Stefano Stabellini , Bjorn Helgaas , Dave Jiang , Boris Ostrovsky , Jon Derrick , Juergen Gross , Russ Anderson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jacob Pan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:41:48AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29 2020 at 16:03, Megha Dey wrote: > > On 8/26/2020 4:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> #9 is obviously just for the folks interested in IMS > >> > > > > I see that the tip tree (as of 9/29) has most of these patches but > > notice that the DEV_MSI related patches > > > > haven't made it. I have tested the tip tree(x86/irq branch) with your > > DEV_MSI infra patches and our IMS patches with the IDXD driver and was > > Your IMS patches? Why do you need something special again? > > > wondering if we should push out those patches as part of our patchset? > > As I don't have any hardware to test that, I was waiting for you and > Jason to confirm that this actually works for the two different IMS > implementations. How urgently do you need this? The code looked good from what I understood. It will be a while before we have all the parts to send an actual patch though. We might be able to put together a mockup just to prove it Jason _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu