* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix lockdep splat in iommu_flush_dev_iotlb()
[not found] <20201005144517.2527627-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2020-10-05 14:45 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-10-05 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: Sasha Levin, iommu, Joerg Roedel
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 1a3f2fd7fc4e8f24510830e265de2ffb8e3300d2 ]
Lock(&iommu->lock) without disabling irq causes lockdep warnings.
[ 12.703950] ========================================================
[ 12.703962] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
[ 12.703975] 5.9.0-rc6+ #659 Not tainted
[ 12.703983] --------------------------------------------------------
[ 12.703995] systemd-udevd/284 just changed the state of lock:
[ 12.704007] ffffffffbd6ff4d8 (device_domain_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at:
iommu_flush_dev_iotlb.part.57+0x2e/0x90
[ 12.704031] but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 12.704043] (&iommu->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
[ 12.704045]
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between
them.
[ 12.704073]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 12.704085] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 12.704097] CPU0 CPU1
[ 12.704106] ---- ----
[ 12.704115] lock(&iommu->lock);
[ 12.704123] local_irq_disable();
[ 12.704134] lock(device_domain_lock);
[ 12.704146] lock(&iommu->lock);
[ 12.704158] <Interrupt>
[ 12.704164] lock(device_domain_lock);
[ 12.704174]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200927062428.13713-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index 2ffec65df3889..1147626f0d253 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -2560,14 +2560,14 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_one_dev_info(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
}
/* Setup the PASID entry for requests without PASID: */
- spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, flags);
if (hw_pass_through && domain_type_is_si(domain))
ret = intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(iommu, domain,
dev, PASID_RID2PASID);
else
ret = intel_pasid_setup_second_level(iommu, domain,
dev, PASID_RID2PASID);
- spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Setup RID2PASID failed\n");
dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-10-05 14:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20201005144517.2527627-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2020-10-05 14:45 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix lockdep splat in iommu_flush_dev_iotlb() Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).