iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: xen-swiotlb vs phys_to_dma
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:00:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201007060008.GA10125@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010061325230.10908@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:46:12PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> OK, this makes a lot of sense, and I like the patch because it makes the
> swiotlb interface clearer.
> 
> Just one comment below.
> 

> > +phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> > +		size_t mapping_size, size_t alloc_size,
> > +		enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> >  {
> > +	dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr = phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, io_tlb_start);
> 
> This is supposed to be hwdev, not dev

Yeah, te compiler would be rather unhappy oterwise.

I'll resend it after the dma-mapping and Xen trees are merged by Linus
to avoid a merge conflict.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02 12:34 xen-swiotlb vs phys_to_dma Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-02 20:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-06  8:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-06 20:46     ` Stefano Stabellini
2020-10-07  6:00       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-10-07 17:15         ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201007060008.GA10125@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).