From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D48C43467 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A462222E for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C5A462222E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E88776A; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YMIqYzjus7I; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B519987750; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5C2C07FF; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F64C0051 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F778776A for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T-FKcYXtmYp9 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5454D87750 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gaia (unknown [95.149.105.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1DFA21655; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 13:38:55 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] of/fdt: Update zone_dma_bits when running in bcm2711 Message-ID: <20201010123854.GA27186@gaia> References: <12f33d487eabd626db4c07ded5a1447795eed355.camel@suse.de> <20201009071013.GA12208@lst.de> <513833810c15b5efeab7c3cbae1963a78c71a79f.camel@suse.de> <20201009152433.GA19953@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20201009171051.GL23638@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Frank Rowand , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Memory Management List , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Linux ARM , Robin Murphy X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 12:36 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 19:10, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:23:06PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 17:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi > > > > wrote: > > > > > We can move this check to IORT code and call it from arm64 if it > > > > > can be made to work. > > > > > > > > Finding the smallest value in the IORT, and assigning it to > > > > zone_dma_bits if it is < 32 should be easy. But as I understand it, > > > > having these separate DMA and DMA32 zones is what breaks kdump, no? So > > > > how is this going to fix the underlying issue? > > > > > > If zone_dma_bits is 32, ZONE_DMA32 disappears into ZONE_DMA (GFP_DMA32 > > > allocations fall back to ZONE_DMA). > > > > > > kdump wants DMA-able memory and, without a 30-bit ZONE_DMA, that would > > > be the bottom 32-bit. With the introduction of ZONE_DMA, this suddenly > > > became 1GB. We could change kdump to allocate ZONE_DMA32 but this one > > > may also be small as it lost 1GB to ZONE_DMA. However, the kdump kernel > > > would need to be rebuilt without ZONE_DMA since it won't have any. IIRC > > > (it's been a while since I looked), the kdump allocation couldn't span > > > multiple zones. > > > > > > In a separate thread, we try to fix kdump to use allocations above 4G as > > > a fallback but this only fixes platforms with enough RAM (and maybe it's > > > only those platforms that care about kdump). > > > > > > > One thing that strikes me as odd is that we are applying the same > > shifting logic to ZONE_DMA as we are applying to ZONE_DMA32, i.e., if > > DRAM starts outside of the zone, it is shifted upwards. > > > > On a typical ARM box, this gives me > > > > [ 0.000000] Zone ranges: > > [ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000080000000-0x00000000bfffffff] > > [ 0.000000] DMA32 [mem 0x00000000c0000000-0x00000000ffffffff] > > [ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000000fffffffff] > > > > i.e., the 30-bit addressable range has bit 31 set, which is weird. > > Yes I agree it's weird, and IMO plain useless. I sent a series this summer to > address this[1], which ultimately triggered the discussion we're having right > now. I don't mind assuming that ZONE_DMA is always from pfn 0 (i.e. no dma_offset for such constrained devices). But if ZONE_DMA32 is squeezed out with ZONE_DMA extended to 4GB, it should allow non-zero upper 32 bits. IIRC we do have SoCs with RAM starting above 4GB. However, your patch didn't completely solve the problem for non-RPi4 platforms as there's hardware with RAM starting at 0 that doesn't need the 1GB ZONE_DMA. We may end up with a combination of the two approaches. > Although with with your latest patch and the DT counterpart, we should be OK. > It would be weird for a HW description to define DMA constraints that are > impossible to reach on that system. I don't remember the difficulties with parsing a DT early for inferring the ZONE_DMA requirements. Could we not check the dma-ranges property in the soc node? I can see bcm2711.dtsi defines a 30-bit address range. We are not interested in the absolute physical/bus addresses, just the size to check whether it's smaller than 32-bit. > > I wonder if it wouldn't be better (and less problematic in the general > > case) to drop this logic for ZONE_DMA, and simply let it remain empty > > unless there is really some memory there. > > From my experience, you can't have empty ZONE_DMA when enabled. Empty > ZONE_DMA32 is OK though. Although I'm sure it's something that can be changed. Indeed, because we still have GFP_DMA around which can't fall back to ZONE_DMA32 (well, unless CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is disabled). -- Catalin _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu