From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7269C2D0A3 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2744A207BB for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2744A207BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97CB86C8B; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7-VV-6R2EGK; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C8F86C77; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8666C0889; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9315AC0051 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D2785533 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQEGiH_v_j7P for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from theia.8bytes.org (8bytes.org [81.169.241.247]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A612185535 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 871D45EA; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:55:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:55:40 +0100 From: "joro@8bytes.org" To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Message-ID: <20201103165539.GN22888@8bytes.org> References: <20201103095208.GA22888@8bytes.org> <20201103125643.GN2620339@nvidia.com> <20201103131852.GE22888@8bytes.org> <20201103132335.GO2620339@nvidia.com> <20201103140318.GL22888@8bytes.org> <20201103140642.GQ2620339@nvidia.com> <20201103143532.GM22888@8bytes.org> <20201103152223.GR2620339@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201103152223.GR2620339@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: "jean-philippe@linaro.org" , "Tian, Kevin" , "Raj, Ashok" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "stefanha@gmail.com" , Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Sun, Yi Y" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "Wu, Hao" , "Tian, Jun J" X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:22:23AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > This whole thread was brought up by IDXD which has a SVA driver and > now wants to add a vfio-mdev driver too. SVA devices that want to be > plugged into VMs are going to be common - this architecture that a SVA > driver cannot cover the kvm case seems problematic. Isn't that the same pattern as having separate drivers for VFs and the parent device in SR-IOV? Regards, Joerg _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu