iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>
Cc: "Longpeng\(Mike\)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, arei.gonglei@huawei.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:21:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210915152129.1254-3-longpeng2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210915152129.1254-1-longpeng2@huawei.com>

__domain_mapping() always removes the pages in the range from
'iov_pfn' to 'end_pfn', but the 'end_pfn' is always the last pfn
of the range that the caller wants to map.

This would introduce too many duplicated removing and leads the
map operation take too long, for example:

  Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
    iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
    iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
    iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
    iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
    iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x7e617ff
    ...
  it takes about 50ms in total.

We can reduce the cost by recalculate the 'end_pfn' and limit it
to the boundary of the end of the pte page.

  Map iova=0x100000,nr_pages=0x7d61800
    iov_pfn: 0x100000, end_pfn: 0x13ffff
    iov_pfn: 0x140000, end_pfn: 0x17ffff
    iov_pfn: 0x180000, end_pfn: 0x1bffff
    iov_pfn: 0x1c0000, end_pfn: 0x1fffff
    iov_pfn: 0x200000, end_pfn: 0x23ffff
    ...
  it only need 9ms now.

Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 12 +++++++-----
 include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index d75f59a..87cbf34 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -2354,12 +2354,18 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			first_pte = pte;
 
+			lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
+			BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
+
 			/* It is large page*/
 			if (largepage_lvl > 1) {
 				unsigned long end_pfn;
+				unsigned long pages_to_remove;
 
 				pteval |= DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
-				end_pfn = ((iov_pfn + nr_pages) & level_mask(largepage_lvl)) - 1;
+				pages_to_remove = min_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
+							nr_pte_to_next_page(pte) * lvl_pages);
+				end_pfn = iov_pfn + pages_to_remove - 1;
 				switch_to_super_page(domain, iov_pfn, end_pfn, largepage_lvl);
 			} else {
 				pteval &= ~(uint64_t)DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE;
@@ -2381,10 +2387,6 @@ static void switch_to_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 			WARN_ON(1);
 		}
 
-		lvl_pages = lvl_to_nr_pages(largepage_lvl);
-
-		BUG_ON(nr_pages < lvl_pages);
-
 		nr_pages -= lvl_pages;
 		iov_pfn += lvl_pages;
 		phys_pfn += lvl_pages;
diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
index a590b00..4bff70c 100644
--- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
@@ -713,6 +713,12 @@ static inline bool first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
 	return !((unsigned long)pte & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK);
 }
 
+static inline int nr_pte_to_next_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
+{
+	return first_pte_in_page(pte) ? BIT_ULL(VTD_STRIDE_SHIFT) :
+		(struct dma_pte *)VTD_PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)pte) - pte;
+}
+
 extern struct dmar_drhd_unit * dmar_find_matched_drhd_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
 extern int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev);
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-15 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-15 15:21 [PATCH v1 0/2] iommu/vt-d: boost the mapping process Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu/vt-d: convert the return type of first_pte_in_page to bool Longpeng(Mike)
2021-09-15 15:21 ` Longpeng(Mike) [this message]
2021-09-30 14:14   ` [PATCH v1 2/2] iommu/vt-d: avoid duplicated removing in __domain_mapping Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210915152129.1254-3-longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).