iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier()
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 13:42:16 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220502164216.GP8364@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220502161204.GA22@qian>

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 12:12:04PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 08:49:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Hi Joerg,
> > 
> > This is a resend version of v8 posted here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220308054421.847385-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
> > as we discussed in this thread:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/Yk%2Fq1BGN8pC5HVZp@8bytes.org/
> > 
> > All patches can be applied perfectly except this one:
> >  - [PATCH v8 02/11] driver core: Add dma_cleanup callback in bus_type
> > It conflicts with below refactoring commit:
> >  - 4b775aaf1ea99 "driver core: Refactor sysfs and drv/bus remove hooks"
> > The conflict has been fixed in this post.
> > 
> > No functional changes in this series. I suppress cc-ing this series to
> > all v8 reviewers in order to avoid spam.
> > 
> > Please consider it for your iommu tree.
> 
> Reverting this series fixed an user-after-free while doing SR-IOV.
> 
>  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire
>  Read of size 8 at addr ffff080279825d78 by task qemu-system-aar/22429
>  CPU: 24 PID: 22429 Comm: qemu-system-aar Not tainted 5.18.0-rc5-next-20220502 #69
>  Call trace:
>   dump_backtrace
>   show_stack
>   dump_stack_lvl
>   print_address_description.constprop.0
>   print_report
>   kasan_report
>   __asan_report_load8_noabort
>   __lock_acquire
>   lock_acquire.part.0
>   lock_acquire
>   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>   arm_smmu_detach_dev
>   arm_smmu_detach_dev at drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:2377
>   arm_smmu_attach_dev

Hum.

So what has happened is that VFIO does this sequence:

 iommu_detach_group()
 iommu_domain_free()
 iommu_group_release_dma_owner()

Which, I think should be valid, API wise.

From what I can see reading the code SMMUv3 blows up above because it
doesn't have a detach_dev op:

	.default_domain_ops = &(const struct iommu_domain_ops) {
		.attach_dev		= arm_smmu_attach_dev,
		.map_pages		= arm_smmu_map_pages,
		.unmap_pages		= arm_smmu_unmap_pages,
		.flush_iotlb_all	= arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all,
		.iotlb_sync		= arm_smmu_iotlb_sync,
		.iova_to_phys		= arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
		.enable_nesting		= arm_smmu_enable_nesting,
		.free			= arm_smmu_domain_free,
	}

But it is internally tracking the domain inside the master - so when
the next domain is attached it does this:

static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
{
	struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;

	spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);

And explodes as the domain has been freed but master->domain was not
NULL'd.

It worked before because iommu_detach_group() used to attach the
default group and that was before the domain was freed in the above
sequence.

I'm guessing SMMU3 needs to call it's arm_smmu_detach_dev(master) from
the detach_dev op and null it's cached copy of the domain, but I don't
know this driver.. Robin?

Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18  0:49 [RESEND PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 01/11] iommu: Add DMA ownership management interfaces Lu Baolu
2022-06-15  9:53   ` Steven Price
2022-06-15 10:57     ` Robin Murphy
2022-06-15 15:09       ` Steven Price
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 02/11] driver core: Add dma_cleanup callback in bus_type Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 03/11] amba: Stop sharing platform_dma_configure() Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 04/11] bus: platform, amba, fsl-mc, PCI: Add device DMA ownership management Lu Baolu
2023-06-26 13:02   ` Zenghui Yu
2023-06-28 14:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-29  2:55       ` Zenghui Yu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 05/11] PCI: pci_stub: Set driver_managed_dma Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 06/11] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 07/11] vfio: Set DMA ownership for VFIO devices Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 08/11] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 09/11] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:49 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 10/11] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2022-04-18  0:50 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 11/11] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu
2022-04-28  9:32 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Joerg Roedel
2022-04-28 11:54   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-04-28 13:34     ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-02 16:12 ` Qian Cai
2022-05-02 16:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu [this message]
2022-05-03 13:04     ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-03 15:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-03 17:22         ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-04  8:42   ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-04 11:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-04 11:57       ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-09 18:33         ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-13  8:13           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-04 16:29     ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-13 15:49       ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-13 16:25         ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-13 19:06           ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220502164216.GP8364@nvidia.com \
    --to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).