iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu/vt-d: Convert global spinlock into per domain ones
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 10:51:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220614025137.1632762-13-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614025137.1632762-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

Using a global device_domain_lock spinlock to protect per-domain device
tracking lists is an inefficient way, especially considering this lock
is also needed in the hot paths. This optimizes the locking mechanism
by converting the global lock to per domain lock.

On the other hand, as the device tracking lists are never accessed in
any interrupt context, there is no need to disable interrupts while
spinning. Replace irqsave variant with spinlock calls.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h |  1 +
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index 6724703d573b..cc304ff09a7b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ struct dmar_domain {
 	u8 force_snooping : 1;		/* Create IOPTEs with snoop control */
 	u8 set_pte_snp:1;
 
+	spinlock_t lock;		/* Protect device tracking lists */
 	struct list_head devices;	/* all devices' list */
 
 	struct dma_pte	*pgd;		/* virtual address */
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index aa3dea1c9f13..60e70682a190 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -310,7 +310,6 @@ static int iommu_skip_te_disable;
 #define IDENTMAP_GFX		2
 #define IDENTMAP_AZALIA		4
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(device_domain_lock);
 const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops;
 
 static bool translation_pre_enabled(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
@@ -534,9 +533,8 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct device_domain_info *info;
 	int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&domain->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
 		/*
 		 * There could possibly be multiple device numa nodes as devices
@@ -548,7 +546,7 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 		if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
 			break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
 
 	return nid;
 }
@@ -1375,12 +1373,11 @@ iommu_support_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 			u8 bus, u8 devfn)
 {
 	struct device_domain_info *info = NULL, *tmp;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!iommu->qi)
 		return NULL;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&domain->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &domain->devices, link) {
 		if (tmp->iommu == iommu && tmp->bus == bus &&
 		    tmp->devfn == devfn) {
@@ -1389,7 +1386,7 @@ iommu_support_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
 
 	return info;
 }
@@ -1398,9 +1395,8 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct device_domain_info *info;
 	bool has_iotlb_device = false;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&domain->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
 		if (info->ats_enabled) {
 			has_iotlb_device = true;
@@ -1408,7 +1404,7 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 		}
 	}
 	domain->has_iotlb_device = has_iotlb_device;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
 }
 
 static void iommu_enable_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info)
@@ -1499,17 +1495,15 @@ static void __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info,
 static void iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 				  u64 addr, unsigned mask)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct device_domain_info *info;
 
 	if (!domain->has_iotlb_device)
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&domain->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link)
 		__iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(info, addr, mask);
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
 }
 
 static void iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
@@ -1769,6 +1763,7 @@ static struct dmar_domain *alloc_domain(unsigned int type)
 		domain->flags |= DOMAIN_FLAG_USE_FIRST_LEVEL;
 	domain->has_iotlb_device = false;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->devices);
+	spin_lock_init(&domain->lock);
 
 	return domain;
 }
@@ -2442,7 +2437,6 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	u8 bus, devfn;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -2454,9 +2448,9 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&domain->lock);
 	list_add(&info->link, &domain->devices);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
 	info->domain = domain;
 
 	/* PASID table is mandatory for a PCI device in scalable mode. */
@@ -4134,7 +4128,6 @@ static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
 	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct dmar_domain *domain = info->domain;
 	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(info->dev)) {
 		if (dev_is_pci(info->dev) && sm_supported(iommu))
@@ -4146,9 +4139,9 @@ static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
 		intel_pasid_free_table(info->dev);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&domain->lock);
 	list_del(&info->link);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&domain->lock);
 
 	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
 }
@@ -4432,7 +4425,7 @@ static bool domain_support_force_snooping(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 	struct device_domain_info *info;
 	bool support = true;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
+	assert_spin_locked(&domain->lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
 		if (!ecap_sc_support(info->iommu->ecap)) {
 			support = false;
@@ -4447,8 +4440,7 @@ static void domain_set_force_snooping(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct device_domain_info *info;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
+	assert_spin_locked(&domain->lock);
 	/*
 	 * Second level page table supports per-PTE snoop control. The
 	 * iommu_map() interface will handle this by setting SNP bit.
@@ -4466,20 +4458,19 @@ static void domain_set_force_snooping(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 static bool intel_iommu_enforce_cache_coherency(struct iommu_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (dmar_domain->force_snooping)
 		return true;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&dmar_domain->lock);
 	if (!domain_support_force_snooping(dmar_domain)) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock(&dmar_domain->lock);
 		return false;
 	}
 
 	domain_set_force_snooping(dmar_domain);
 	dmar_domain->force_snooping = true;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&dmar_domain->lock);
 
 	return true;
 }
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-14  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-14  2:51 [PATCH v2 00/12] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:43   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:15     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15  1:53     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15  6:13       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 13:02         ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:49   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:21     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15  6:22       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 13:10         ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-16  4:00           ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Unnecessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:52   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:22     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:56   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  6:57   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  7:07   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:44     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Lu Baolu
2022-06-14  7:16   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14  7:47     ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14  2:51 ` Lu Baolu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220614025137.1632762-13-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).