iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: phill@raspberryi.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
	wahrenst@gmx.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] of/fdt: add function to get the SoC wide DMA addressable memory size
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:03:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2050374ac07e0330e505c4a1637256428adb10c4.camel@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKF5nh3hcdLTG5+6RU3_TnFrNX08vD6qZ8wawoA3WSRpA@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3219 bytes --]

Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review!

On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:17 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:48 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> wrote:
> > Some SoCs might have multiple interconnects each with their own DMA
> > addressing limitations. This function parses the 'dma-ranges' on each of
> > them and tries to guess the maximum SoC wide DMA addressable memory
> > size.
> > 
> > This is specially useful for arch code in order to properly setup CMA
> > and memory zones.
> 
> We already have a way to setup CMA in reserved-memory, so why is this
> needed for that?

Correct me if I'm wrong but I got the feeling you got the point of the patch
later on.

> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/of/fdt.c       | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/of_fdt.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > index 9cdf14b9aaab..f2444c61a136 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > @@ -953,6 +953,78 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen_stdout(void)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > 
> > +/**
> > + * early_init_dt_dma_zone_size - Look at all 'dma-ranges' and provide the
> > + * maximum common dmable memory size.
> > + *
> > + * Some devices might have multiple interconnects each with their own DMA
> > + * addressing limitations. For example the Raspberry Pi 4 has the
> > following:
> > + *
> > + * soc {
> > + *     dma-ranges = <0xc0000000  0x0 0x00000000  0x3c000000>;
> > + *     [...]
> > + * }
> > + *
> > + * v3dbus {
> > + *     dma-ranges = <0x00000000  0x0 0x00000000  0x3c000000>;
> > + *     [...]
> > + * }
> > + *
> > + * scb {
> > + *     dma-ranges = <0x0 0x00000000  0x0 0x00000000  0xfc000000>;
> > + *     [...]
> > + * }
> > + *
> > + * Here the area addressable by all devices is [0x00000000-0x3bffffff].
> > Hence
> > + * the function will write in 'data' a size of 0x3c000000.
> > + *
> > + * Note that the implementation assumes all interconnects have the same
> > physical
> > + * memory view and that the mapping always start at the beginning of RAM.
> 
> Not really a valid assumption for general code.

Fair enough. On my defence I settled on that assumption after grepping all dts
and being unable to find a board that behaved otherwise.

[...]

> It's possible to have multiple levels of nodes and dma-ranges. You need to
> handle that case too. Doing that and handling differing address translations
> will be complicated.

Understood.

> IMO, I'd just do:
> 
> if (of_fdt_machine_is_compatible(blob, "brcm,bcm2711"))
>     dma_zone_size = XX;
> 
> 2 lines of code is much easier to maintain than 10s of incomplete code
> and is clearer who needs this. Maybe if we have dozens of SoCs with
> this problem we should start parsing dma-ranges.

FYI that's what arm32 is doing at the moment and was my first instinct. But it
seems that arm64 has been able to survive so far without any machine specific
code and I have the feeling Catalin and Will will not be happy about this
solution. Am I wrong?


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-31 15:47 [PATCH 0/8] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling max_zone_dma_phys() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: rename variables used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] of/fdt: add function to get the SoC wide DMA addressable memory size Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-08-02 17:17   ` Rob Herring
2019-08-05 16:03     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne [this message]
2019-08-05 19:23       ` Rob Herring
2019-08-06 18:12         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-08-08 15:02           ` Rob Herring
2019-08-08 17:30             ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm64: re-introduce max_zone_dma_phys() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64: use ZONE_DMA on DMA addressing limited devices Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 17:07   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-01 15:44     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-08-01 16:07       ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-01 16:40         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] dma-direct: turn ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS into a variable Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-08-01 14:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-01 15:59     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: update arch_zone_dma_bits to fine tune dma-direct min mask Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-31 15:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm: comment arm64's usage of 'enum zone_type' Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-08-01 14:08   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2050374ac07e0330e505c4a1637256428adb10c4.camel@suse.de \
    --to=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
    --cc=phill@raspberryi.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).