iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] iommu/uapi: Rename uapi functions
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:58:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <310ebf1c-02d6-b31f-e92e-619d46fa94aa@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596068467-49322-6-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

Hi Jacob,

On 7/30/20 2:21 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> User APIs such as iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid() may also be used by the
> kernel. Since we introduced user pointer to the UAPI functions,
Practically this is done in the next patch. What about something like:

We plan to have two flavors of the same API functions, one called
through ioctls, carrying a user pointer and one called directly with
valid IOMMU UAPI structs. To differentiate both, let's rename existing
functions with an iommu_uapi_ prefix.

Besides
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>


Thanks

Eric
> in-kernel callers cannot share the same APIs. In-kernel callers are also
> trusted, there is no need to validate the data.
> 
> This patch renames all UAPI functions with iommu_uapi_ prefix such that
> is clear to the intended callers.
> 
> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  include/linux/iommu.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index b6858adc4f17..3a913ce94a3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1950,35 +1950,35 @@ int iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_attach_device);
>  
> -int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> -			   struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
> +int iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> +				struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(!domain->ops->cache_invalidate))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	return domain->ops->cache_invalidate(domain, dev, inv_info);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_cache_invalidate);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate);
>  
> -int iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -			   struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> +int iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +			       struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(!domain->ops->sva_bind_gpasid))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	return domain->ops->sva_bind_gpasid(domain, dev, data);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_bind_gpasid);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid);
>  
> -int iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> -			     ioasid_t pasid)
> +int iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> +				 ioasid_t pasid)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(!domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	return domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid(dev, pasid);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid);
>  
>  static void __iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  				  struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 5f0b7859d2eb..2dcc1a33f6dc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -430,13 +430,13 @@ extern int iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  			       struct device *dev);
>  extern void iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  				struct device *dev);
> -extern int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -				  struct device *dev,
> -				  struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info);
> -extern int iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -		struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data);
> -extern int iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -				struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
> +extern int iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				       struct device *dev,
> +				       struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info);
> +extern int iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				      struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data);
> +extern int iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
>  extern struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev);
>  extern struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_dma_domain(struct device *dev);
>  extern int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> @@ -1054,21 +1054,22 @@ static inline int iommu_sva_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle)
>  	return IOMMU_PASID_INVALID;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int
> -iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -		       struct device *dev,
> -		       struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
> +static inline int iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					      struct device *dev,
> +					      struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
>  {
>  	return -ENODEV;
>  }
> -static inline int iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -				struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> +
> +static inline int iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					     struct device *dev,
> +					     struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
>  {
>  	return -ENODEV;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -					   struct device *dev, int pasid)
> +static inline int iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					       struct device *dev, int pasid)
>  {
>  	return -ENODEV;
>  }
> 

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-13  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-30  0:21 [PATCH v7 0/7] IOMMU user API enhancement Jacob Pan
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] docs: IOMMU user API Jacob Pan
2020-08-12 16:38   ` Auger Eric
2020-08-17 22:07     ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] iommu/uapi: Add argsz for user filled data Jacob Pan
2020-08-12 16:59   ` Auger Eric
2020-08-17 22:48     ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] iommu/uapi: Introduce enum type for PASID data format Jacob Pan
2020-08-13  9:29   ` Auger Eric
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] iommu/uapi: Use named union for user data Jacob Pan
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] iommu/uapi: Rename uapi functions Jacob Pan
2020-08-13  8:58   ` Auger Eric [this message]
2020-08-17 23:16     ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] iommu/uapi: Handle data and argsz filled by users Jacob Pan
2020-08-13  9:11   ` Auger Eric
2020-08-13  9:25     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-08-13  9:30       ` Auger Eric
2020-08-13  9:38         ` Liu, Yi L
2020-08-13 10:03           ` Auger Eric
2020-07-30  0:21 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Check UAPI data processed by IOMMU core Jacob Pan
2020-08-13  9:19   ` Auger Eric
2020-08-31 17:52     ` Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=310ebf1c-02d6-b31f-e92e-619d46fa94aa@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).