From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C96C433DF for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A607206E6 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6A607206E6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1EC881D0; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BP0SbqHb9uQ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD7587EDB; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C958C0050; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BD5C004D for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAFC87FFF for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DoPxzmAiIFBz for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D82887EDB for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FB0AD1F; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 17:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <6c2805d3ff6297526e6f612b9c94bb7f73055160.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: revert scope for 5.8, was Re: dma-pool fixes From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne To: Amit Pundir , Christoph Hellwig Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 18:59:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20200728124114.GA4865@lst.de> <20200728153055.GA16701@lst.de> <18a3b93cc5ba3e0e39ae1b14759ce31121d54045.camel@suse.de> <20200731130903.GA31110@lst.de> <20200801085706.GA2991@lst.de> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Linus Torvalds , jeremy.linton@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Rientjes , Robin Murphy X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 17:27 +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: [...] > > I'm between a rock and a hard place here. If we simply want to revert > > commits as-is to make sure both the Raspberry Pi 4 and thone phone do > > not regress we'll have to go all the way back and revert the whole SEV > > pool support. I could try to manual revert of the multiple pool > > support, but it is very late for that. > > Hi, I found the problematic memory region. It was a memory > chunk reserved/removed in the downstream tree but was > seemingly reserved upstream for different drivers. I failed to > calculate the length of the total region reserved downstream > correctly. And there was still a portion of memory left unmarked, > which I should have marked as reserved in my testing earlier > today. > > Sorry for all the noise and thanks Nicolas, Christoph and David > for your patience. That's great news, thanks for persevering! Regards, Nicolas _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu