iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] irqdomain: Add max_affinity argument to irq_domain_alloc_descs()
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:26:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfgj59mp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201005152856.974112-7-dwmw2@infradead.org>

On Mon, Oct 05 2020 at 16:28, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> This is the maximum possible set of CPUs which can be used. Use it
> to calculate the default affinity requested from __irq_alloc_descs()
> by first attempting to find the intersection with irq_default_affinity,
> or falling back to using just the max_affinity if the intersection
> would be empty.

And why do we need that as yet another argument?

This is an optional property of the irq domain, really and no caller has
any business with that. 

>  int irq_domain_alloc_descs(int virq, unsigned int cnt, irq_hw_number_t hwirq,
> -			   int node, const struct irq_affinity_desc *affinity)
> +			   int node, const struct irq_affinity_desc *affinity,
> +			   const struct cpumask *max_affinity)
>  {
> +	cpumask_var_t default_affinity;
>  	unsigned int hint;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* Check requested per-IRQ affinities are in the possible range */
> +	if (affinity && max_affinity) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
> +			if (!cpumask_subset(&affinity[i].mask, max_affinity))
> +				return -EINVAL;

https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1701171956290.3645@nanos

What is preventing the affinity spreading code from spreading the masks
out to unusable CPUs? The changelog is silent about that part.

> +	/*
> +	 * Generate default affinity. Either the possible subset of
> +	 * irq_default_affinity if such a subset is non-empty, or fall
> +	 * back to the provided max_affinity if there is no intersection.
..
> +	 * And just a copy of irq_default_affinity in the
> +	 * !CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK case.

We know that already...

> +	 */
> +	memset(&default_affinity, 0, sizeof(default_affinity));

Right, memset() before allocating is useful.

> +	if ((max_affinity &&
> +	     !cpumask_subset(irq_default_affinity, max_affinity))) {
> +		if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&default_affinity, GFP_KERNEL))
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		cpumask_and(default_affinity, max_affinity,
> +			    irq_default_affinity);
> +		if (cpumask_empty(default_affinity))
> +			cpumask_copy(default_affinity, max_affinity);
> +	} else if (cpumask_available(default_affinity))
> +		cpumask_copy(default_affinity, irq_default_affinity);

That's garbage and unreadable.

Thanks,

        tglx
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-05 15:28 [PATCH 0/13] Fix per-domain IRQ affinity, allow >255 CPUs on x86 without IRQ remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/apic: Use x2apic in guest kernels even with unusable CPUs David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/msi: Only use high bits of MSI address for DMAR unit David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 20:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/ioapic: Handle Extended Destination ID field in RTE David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/apic: Support 15 bits of APIC ID in IOAPIC/MSI where available David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 05/13] genirq: Prepare for default affinity to be passed to __irq_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:01     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-06 21:07       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 06/13] genirq: Add default_affinity argument " David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 07/13] irqdomain: Add max_affinity argument to irq_domain_alloc_descs() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:26     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-10-07  7:19       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 13:37         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:10           ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:11               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 20:53                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08  7:21               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08  9:34                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-08 11:10                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-08 12:40                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-09  7:54                       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 08/13] genirq: Add irq_domain_set_affinity() David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:22       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/irq: Add x86_non_ir_cpumask David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:42     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:25       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/irq: Limit IOAPIC and MSI domains' affinity without IR David Woodhouse
2020-10-06 21:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07  7:48       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 12:59         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 13:08           ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 14:05             ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 14:23               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 16:02                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 16:15                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:05               ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 15:25                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 15:46                   ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 17:23                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-07 17:34                       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/smp: Allow more than 255 CPUs even without interrupt remapping David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 12/13] iommu/irq_remapping: Kill most of hyperv-iommu.c now it's redundant David Woodhouse
2020-10-05 15:28   ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/kvm: Add KVM_FEATURE_MSI_EXT_DEST_ID David Woodhouse
2020-10-07  8:14     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07  8:59       ` David Woodhouse
2020-10-07 11:15         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-07 12:04           ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lfgj59mp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).