From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: fix return error code in iommu_probe_device()
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:29:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e7481f4-e55e-6c7a-dde9-62912c6e5eb4@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125113545.GA15451@willie-the-truck>
On 2020/11/25 19:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:54:34AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> On 2020/11/18 6:41, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 07:11:28PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>>> On 2020/11/17 17:40, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>>> On 2020/11/17 10:52, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>>>>> If iommu_group_get() failed, it need return error code
>>>>>> in iommu_probe_device().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: cf193888bfbd ("iommu: Move new probe_device path...")
>>>>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>>>> index b53446bb8c6b..6f4a32df90f6 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>>>> @@ -253,8 +253,10 @@ int iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>>>>>> goto err_out;
>>>>>> group = iommu_group_get(dev);
>>>>>> - if (!group)
>>>>>> + if (!group) {
>>>>>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>>>>> Can you please explain why you use -ENODEV here?
>>>> Before 79659190ee97 ("iommu: Don't take group reference in
>>>> iommu_alloc_default_domain()"), in
>>>>
>>>> iommu_alloc_default_domain(), if group is NULL, it will return -ENODEV.
>>> Hmm. While I think the patch is ok, I'm not sure it qualifies as a fix.
>>> Has iommu_probe_device() ever propagated this error? The commit you
>>> identify in the 'Fixes:' tag doesn't seem to change this afaict.
>> I think after this commit 439945e74a4b ("iommu: Move default domain
>> allocation to iommu_probe_device()"),
> That SHA doesn't exist in my tree (maybe you mean 6e1aa2049154?). But even
> then, I'm not sure 6e1aa2049154 is actually broken if you look at the
> interaction with group creation in __iommu_probe_device().
>
> In fact, isn't that the case in mainline too? If __iommu_probe_device()
> returns 0, then we _know_ a group exists and so iommu_group_get() will
> succeed. I'm still happy with the patch in case this changes in future,
> but it doesn't appear to be fixing anything. Do you agree?
Yes, I look into the __iommu_probe_device(), if it can't get group, it
will return error
first. Do I need send a v2 without the fix tag ?
>
> Will
> .
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 2:52 [PATCH] iommu: fix return error code in iommu_probe_device() Yang Yingliang
2020-11-17 9:40 ` Lu Baolu
2020-11-17 11:11 ` Yang Yingliang
2020-11-17 22:41 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-25 1:54 ` Yang Yingliang
2020-11-25 11:35 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-26 2:29 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
2020-11-26 8:59 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e7481f4-e55e-6c7a-dde9-62912c6e5eb4@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).