iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com" <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
	"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@intel.com>,
	"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC v3 2/8] vfio/type1: Make per-application (VM) PASID quota tunable
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:46:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2975661238FB949B60364EF0F2C25743A1B5847@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207114345.2071a482@jacob-builder>

Hi Jacob,

> From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 3:44 AM
> To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/8] vfio/type1: Make per-application (VM) PASID quota tunable
> 
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:11:46 -0800
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > The PASID quota is per-application (VM) according to vfio's PASID
> > management rule. For better flexibility, quota shall be user tunable
> > . This patch provides a VFIO based user interface for which quota can
> > be adjusted. However, quota cannot be adjusted downward below the
> > number of outstanding PASIDs.
> >
> > This patch only makes the per-VM PASID quota tunable. While for the
> > way to tune the default PASID quota, it may require a new vfio module
> > option or other way. This may be another patchset in future.
> >
> One issue we need to solve is how to share PASIDs at the system
> level, e.g. Both VMs and baremetal drivers could use PASIDs.
> 
> This patch is granting quota to a guest w/o knowing the remaining
> system capacity. So guest PASID allocation could fail even within its
> quota.

that's true.

> The solution I am thinking is to enforce quota at IOASID common
> code, since IOASID APIs already used to manage system-wide allocation.
> How about the following changes to IOASID?
> 1. introduce quota in ioasid_set (could have a soft limit for better
> sharing)
>
> 2. introduce an API to create a set with quota before allocation, e.g.
> ioasid_set_id = ioasid_alloc_set(size, token)
> set_id will be used for ioasid_alloc() instead of token.

Is the token the mm pointer? I guess you may want to add one more
API like ioasid_get_set_id(token), thus that other ioasid user could get
set_id with their token. If token is the same give them the same set_id.

> 
> 3. introduce API to adjust set quota ioasid_adjust_set_size(set_id,
> size)
> 
> 4. API to check remaining PASIDs ioasid_get_capacity(set_id); //return
> system capacity if set_id == 0;
> 
> 5. API to set system capacity, ioasid_set_capacity(nr_pasids), e.g. if
> system has 20 bit PASIDs, IOMMU driver needs to call
> ioasid_set_capacity(1<<20) during boot.

yes, this is definitely necessary.

> 6. Optional set level APIs. e.g. ioasid_free_set(set_id), frees all
> IOASIDs in the set.

If this is provided. I think VFIO may be not necessary to track allocated
PASIDs. When VM is down or crashed, VFIO just use this API to reclaim
allocated PASIDs.

> With these APIs, this patch could query PASID capacity at both system
> and set level and adjust quota within range. i.e.
> 1. IOMMU vendor driver(or other driver to use PASID w/o IOMMU) sets
> system wide capacity during boot.
> 2. VFIO Call ioasid_alloc_set() when allocating vfio_mm(), set default
> quota
> 3. Adjust quota per set with ioasid_adjust_set_size() as the tunable in
> this patch.

I think this is abstraction of the allocated PASID track logic in a common
layer. It would simplify user logic.

Regards,
Yi Liu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-08  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-29 12:11 [RFC v3 0/8] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 1/8] vfio: Add VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST(alloc/free) Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 23:55   ` Alex Williamson
2020-01-31 12:41     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-02-06  9:41       ` Liu, Yi L
2020-02-06 18:12       ` Jacob Pan
2020-02-18  5:07       ` Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 2/8] vfio/type1: Make per-application (VM) PASID quota tunable Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 23:56   ` Alex Williamson
2020-02-05  6:23     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-02-07 19:43   ` Jacob Pan
2020-02-08  8:46     ` Liu, Yi L [this message]
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 3/8] vfio: Reclaim PASIDs when application is down Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 23:56   ` Alex Williamson
2020-01-31 12:42     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 4/8] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_NESTING_GET_IOMMU_UAPI_VERSION Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 23:56   ` Alex Williamson
2020-01-31 13:04     ` Liu, Yi L
2020-02-03 18:00       ` Alex Williamson
2020-02-05  6:19         ` Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 5/8] vfio/type1: Report 1st-level/stage-1 page table format to userspace Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 6/8] vfio/type1: Bind guest page tables to host Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 7/8] vfio/type1: Add VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE Liu, Yi L
2020-01-29 12:11 ` [RFC v3 8/8] vfio/type1: Add vSVA support for IOMMU-backed mdevs Liu, Yi L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A2975661238FB949B60364EF0F2C25743A1B5847@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=jun.j.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).