From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Refactor parameters for qi_submit_sync()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:02:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D19D8204B4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415052542.30421-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 1:26 PM
>
> Current qi_submit_sync() supports single invalidation descriptor
> per submission and appends wait descriptor after each submission
> to poll hardware completion. This patch adjusts the parameters
> of this function so that multiple descriptors per submission can
> be supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dmar.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 8 +++++++-
> 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> index d9dc787feef7..bb42177e2369 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> @@ -1225,10 +1225,14 @@ static int qi_check_fault(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu, int index)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Submit the queued invalidation descriptor to the remapping
> - * hardware unit and wait for its completion.
> + * Function to submit invalidation descriptors of all types to the queued
> + * invalidation interface(QI). Multiple descriptors can be submitted at a
> + * time, a wait descriptor will be appended to each submission to ensure
> + * hardware has completed the invalidation before return. Wait descriptors
> + * can be part of the submission but it will not be polled for completion.
> */
> -int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> +int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct qi_desc *desc,
> + unsigned int count, unsigned long options)
Adding parameter w/o actually using them is not typical way of splitting
patches. Better squash this with 2/7 together.
> {
> int rc;
> struct q_inval *qi = iommu->qi;
> @@ -1318,7 +1322,7 @@ void qi_global_iec(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> /* should never fail */
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> void qi_flush_context(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u16 sid, u8 fm,
> @@ -1332,7 +1336,7 @@ void qi_flush_context(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> u16 did, u16 sid, u8 fm,
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> void qi_flush_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64 addr,
> @@ -1356,7 +1360,7 @@ void qi_flush_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> u16 did, u64 addr,
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> void qi_flush_dev_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> @@ -1378,7 +1382,7 @@ void qi_flush_dev_iotlb(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> /* PASID-based IOTLB invalidation */
> @@ -1419,7 +1423,7 @@ void qi_flush_piotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> u16 did, u32 pasid, u64 addr,
> QI_EIOTLB_AM(mask);
> }
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> /* PASID-based device IOTLB Invalidate */
> @@ -1448,7 +1452,7 @@ void qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> if (size_order)
> desc.qw1 |= QI_DEV_EIOTLB_SIZE;
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> void qi_flush_pasid_cache(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> @@ -1458,7 +1462,7 @@ void qi_flush_pasid_cache(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu, u16 did,
>
> desc.qw0 = QI_PC_PASID(pasid) | QI_PC_DID(did) |
> QI_PC_GRAN(granu) | QI_PC_TYPE;
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> index 48cc9ca5f3dc..7969e3dac2ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ pasid_cache_invalidation_with_pasid(struct
> intel_iommu *iommu,
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ iotlb_invalidation_with_pasid(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu, u16 did, u32 pasid)
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> static void
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> index e9f4e979a71f..83dc4319f661 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void intel_flush_svm_range_dev (struct
> intel_svm *svm, struct intel_svm_d
> }
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, svm->iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(svm->iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
>
> if (sdev->dev_iotlb) {
> desc.qw0 = QI_DEV_EIOTLB_PASID(svm->pasid) |
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void intel_flush_svm_range_dev (struct
> intel_svm *svm, struct intel_svm_d
> }
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
> - qi_submit_sync(&desc, svm->iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(svm->iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
> sizeof(req->priv_data));
> resp.qw2 = 0;
> resp.qw3 = 0;
> - qi_submit_sync(&resp, iommu);
> + qi_submit_sync(iommu, &resp, 1, 0);
> }
> head = (head + sizeof(*req)) & PRQ_RING_MASK;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> index 81e43c1df7ec..a042f123b091 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int qi_flush_iec(struct intel_iommu *iommu, int
> index, int mask)
> desc.qw2 = 0;
> desc.qw3 = 0;
>
> - return qi_submit_sync(&desc, iommu);
> + return qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> }
>
> static int modify_irte(struct irq_2_iommu *irq_iommu,
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index cfe720f10112..ee2d5cdd8339 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -710,7 +710,13 @@ void qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(struct intel_iommu
> *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> void qi_flush_pasid_cache(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u64 granu,
> int pasid);
>
> -extern int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct intel_iommu *iommu);
> +int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct qi_desc *desc,
> + unsigned int count, unsigned long options);
> +/*
> + * Options used in qi_submit_sync:
> + * QI_OPT_WAIT_DRAIN - Wait for PRQ drain completion, spec 6.5.2.8.
> + */
> +#define QI_OPT_WAIT_DRAIN BIT(0)
no one uses this flag in this patch
>
> extern int dmar_ir_support(void);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
Thanks
Kevin
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-15 5:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Add page request draining support Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Refactor parameters for qi_submit_sync() Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 8:02 ` Tian, Kevin [this message]
2020-04-15 8:33 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Multiple descriptors per qi_submit_sync() Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 8:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 8:30 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 8:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Add support to show inv queue internals Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Refactor prq_event_thread() Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 9:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-16 1:33 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Save prq descriptors in an internal list Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 9:30 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-16 1:46 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-17 3:25 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Add page request draining support Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 11:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-16 2:19 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-16 8:38 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-17 2:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove redundant IOTLB flush Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Add page request draining support Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 8:25 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D19D8204B4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).