From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A00C388F7 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5873A247E4 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WwKwVrqG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5873A247E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E99F866C1; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0nQXEF-TaAuO; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F09866AF; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C7AC0859; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43BAC0051 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8280204F1 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FUvJrJ7GKQ0 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com (mail-oi1-f196.google.com [209.85.167.196]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E29120396 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id k27so357665oij.11 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fqbPBbAu80DOS7NEwVJeiR8mc+u/TY7x2y8Bdf6D7y8=; b=WwKwVrqGNUwd6qNWm7CHGEDyI1fAnKRN9fx+ncVqIlraJP9cAo/IpGhgul89zdUhBC alC3W2u4js7w/sl/Zci9HCztWqfNRtH9Is2T7eRsq6qQliU/T7Ch9J81ynL0ZVix3R7P in/+ddsnRmUJiY2d8OFGf1UnjII0w0CKDzpAYMHJ+G2V8Wqe4FJCIh4mSAbrOZcNG4ZP iWrhDR5Fsby4GzjkTVby6ORx4n9TuE/uWlwlA22RgbXtmmnIn7tzLLtD1ZCt1sC9IJau F3vc4Lo0VEmWToErSasphXrLTq397HCED1L1dKkAqA4Sa9zKPiCgkiZoxb4dvqBFjN+8 owAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fqbPBbAu80DOS7NEwVJeiR8mc+u/TY7x2y8Bdf6D7y8=; b=hdFjNp4S8uMdfJ80o6ylDUtujYBH+T0SKoAVhKQfo84dYFI/604vquStnUYB6TuBi3 aaVMNTRJ4bbd/Y7fVVzQ6HKeIiQFeBWqbYSM1o0enulKlL2hGoOxwbQSJ5In5b4LPuVa ay+86+6lgqmhITdtd9VbCqCVlaleJh318D/XmC97BI/zskCjV3tHHW9MAW88z5zJdOq2 as6N0hBeb6jdNaHRGsHbs1OGkDUe25RvmbGz7hfgX6X7NcR+Xei7r/6gD8qcN7bXKCsC ZniwiJU8w/UDt7koeKkFEtUXKcr5K/N3J3+UfILLb412FDzCrzpiVo3LKqXUPVdcS9EQ p/fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kQpxjn0BQCiUMujRJh7J4uZL95LWVXz0W/GpSTxE7pSVijWD2 pNhikAwFEr6NKKY/CUax1PH4nqF//8TZ4t8aRME= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxso2L2p/apSohrbS6QPMdTbCBYEKz2ClMfyl412qTd5wlGYYkyqwMPhM2b5rJtpMvZrvBxAtn5rg8SEN2I7fU= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5487:: with SMTP id i129mr73043oib.154.1603906712561; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190802180758.9691-1-gavinli@thegavinli.com> <20190803062333.GC29348@lst.de> <20201028173152.GA10224@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20201028173152.GA10224@lst.de> From: Oded Gabbay Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:38:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dma-mapping: normal memory for mmap() on coherent architectures To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Robin Murphy , Gavin Li , gavinli@thegavinli.com, "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel , " X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:31 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:39:17PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:26 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > See the discussion at: > > > > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2019-August/037716.html > > > > > > Just curious, what driver do you use that uses dma_mmap_coherent on > > > x86? > > > _______________________________________________ > > > iommu mailing list > > > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu > > > > Hi Christoph, > > In the habanalabs driver we have moved to use dma_mmap_coherent (to > > match dma_alloc_coherent - see commit > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/29/252) > > Since then, we are plagued by the kernel log message that gavin has > > mentioned, as we are mostly running in our C/I environment with 5.4. > > I wondered if you know if there was any fix to that in the more recent kernels ? > > If not, can I help to fix that ? > > What are the kernel log messages that gaving has mentioned? This one: 11:22:43 [Wed Oct 28 11:22:34 2020] x86/PAT: synapse_tests:29265 map pfn RAM range req uncached-minus for [mem 0xe6236b000-0xe6236bfff], got write-back Thousands of the same message with different addresses of course. Thanks, Oded _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu