From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D37C433E0 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679F92072A for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="n+aIAs6a" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 679F92072A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE8385A00; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfD9PwLCefpI; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A51855CB; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4C0C0050; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B87C004C for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31012875C7 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9zGQjdwzBeS for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2048D87466 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id x5so12219698wmi.2 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 08:04:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eW7G50BEHZFxUEoF4R4WWrRMfn3bV+ZtvDiP+IO1PBc=; b=n+aIAs6a9Chu+KDVgSRWCIIahC/gDYEVAI3sMDEjK4t52boIIv2PJGr66jygzwTXxB Z02ocwWgSrkKdoLohAAGIFlSRS9L5aLqUMvfkJxscoOHhiQR1a8MnKGwfyD6fQ2kNZcl YZezhd+ZK2Cf7Nwz7N1eNwlGL5A9b8y7Ens1vZnk73Yoy/w6Nax0YWdjNzd1MI/NdeWL hIqONEpuAknT5gwlzj/Ee+q7SmQjt5fKEgbgAVkggxYck6uZPcK/ZdUOFVS4FR0tn1c+ x5ZYpxKaMm9vT367sT4eVJAE1ROd5zqBZ0S9D37BaCDfneBOGXhrFfaCBRYGspBMuxwE eiOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eW7G50BEHZFxUEoF4R4WWrRMfn3bV+ZtvDiP+IO1PBc=; b=lLHmOGn+5TKm5SuUe+3baetxbQho7NDgrbuulqBa8PLYLSUluxjsWOArgksRR8gzlA ICaVNxFHwzfXhUhJKMb016fzFklZriXMog/ARtF5lhR1JeuPE4pJb9yi8YZNlyVwxoiX xrC67Zbk34GIzD7qeqF9WqzLu73dn2ieL5VVtMrqH2qpO+60tZx4YTlEL5AGakW/D3IP gJJ8rTJR4cs4B8e0C4/ul+wj6Um4cLQMdWv5PK74LYlQSV6gmx3+5UJQT+jtud+8CCr9 yGXWepL4m3d9rNaQ47Fd9psl3RNDgYDniwr3HO76e0zLAH32JjYSAWp9OrlEmBNgFAR8 44sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PoKkBBZo36NaJECTFRwiMbwAGPcKSTdR7bBgF+e6nRgOhcgsR hSQIu8DVSgOYNM7WmpQ+8L8jfoUFB2Lh3xS7AOMauQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7J1bS68K42bIqrV9oSxB4crqnaXKbRRRxbzPWYv9FaKdMqrSpQ66PLAqCQrk0O2r8rKbexTzbOHqZ6yNIVHo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2209:: with SMTP id z9mr11768642wml.70.1596380686479; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 08:04:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200728153055.GA16701@lst.de> <18a3b93cc5ba3e0e39ae1b14759ce31121d54045.camel@suse.de> <20200731130903.GA31110@lst.de> <20200801085706.GA2991@lst.de> <20200801173952.GA15542@lst.de> In-Reply-To: From: Amit Pundir Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:34:10 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: revert scope for 5.8, was Re: dma-pool fixes To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linus Torvalds , iommu , jeremy.linton@arm.com, Caleb Connolly , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Rientjes , Robin Murphy X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 10:16, Amit Pundir wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 23:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 05:27:04PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > > > Hi, I found the problematic memory region. It was a memory > > > chunk reserved/removed in the downstream tree but was > > > seemingly reserved upstream for different drivers. I failed to > > > calculate the length of the total region reserved downstream > > > correctly. And there was still a portion of memory left unmarked, > > > which I should have marked as reserved in my testing earlier > > > today. > > > > > > Sorry for all the noise and thanks Nicolas, Christoph and David > > > for your patience. > > > > So you'll need to patch the upstream DTS to fix this up? Do you also > > need my two fixes? What about the Oneplus phones? Can you send a > > mail with a summary of the status? > > Poco's DTS is not upstreamed yet. I have updated it for this fix > and sent out a newer version for review. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/1/184 > > I didn't need to try your two add-on fixes. I'll give them a spin > later today. Hi Christoph, I see no obvious regressions with your twin dma-pool fixes on my PocoF1 phone. Caleb also confirmed that a similar reserved-memory region fix in his One Plus 6 device-tree worked for him too. > > I'm sure One Plus 6 and 6T will be running into similar problem. > I'll check with Caleb and send out a status mail with the summary. > > Regards, > Amit Pundir _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu