From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/8] iommufd/device: Use iommu_group_replace_domain()
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:17:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+FSVoRpVguZUmW9@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52760BBE37B65AAFA0CDCC708CDA9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 08:46:04AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 3:05 PM
> >
> > @@ -246,6 +249,18 @@ static int iommufd_device_do_attach(struct
> > iommufd_device *idev,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (cur_hwpt) {
> > + /* Replace the cur_hwpt */
> > + mutex_lock(&cur_hwpt->devices_lock);
> > + if (cur_hwpt->ioas != hwpt->ioas)
> > + iopt_remove_reserved_iova(&cur_hwpt->ioas->iopt,
> > + idev->dev);
> > + list_del(&cur_hwpt->hwpt_item);
>
> emmm shouldn't this be done only when the device is the last
> one attached to the hwpt? and if it's the last one you should
> also iopt_table_remove_domain() together with list_del, i.e.
> similar housekeeping as done in iommufd_device_detach().
You are right. I had another patch on top of this series,
moving this list_del() and iopt_table_remove_domain() to
the destroy() callback, so I overlooked.
And I just found that the list_add_del(hwpt_item) in the
IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_PAGETABLE case doesn't seem to call at the
first device's attachment. So, I think that we might need
my previous "symmetric" patch in this series too.
Will fix in v2. Thanks!
Nic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-06 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 7:05 [PATCH v1 0/8] Add IO page table replacement support Nicolin Chen
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] iommu: Move dev_iommu_ops() to private header Nicolin Chen
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] iommu: Introduce a new iommu_group_replace_domain() API Nicolin Chen
2023-02-02 10:21 ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-02 19:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-03 1:33 ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-03 1:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-03 2:35 ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-03 8:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-03 15:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-03 17:53 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-06 6:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-06 13:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-07 0:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-07 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-08 4:25 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-08 12:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-07 19:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-03 17:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-06 6:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] iommufd: Create access in vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind() Nicolin Chen
2023-02-03 9:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-03 9:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_ACCESS_SET_IOAS coverage Nicolin Chen
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] iommufd: Add replace support in iommufd_access_set_ioas() Nicolin Chen
2023-02-03 10:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-03 12:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-03 22:25 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for access->ioas replacement Nicolin Chen
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] iommufd/device: Use iommu_group_replace_domain() Nicolin Chen
2023-02-06 8:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-06 19:17 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2023-02-07 0:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-02 7:05 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] vfio-iommufd: Support IO page table replacement Nicolin Chen
2023-02-06 8:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-06 18:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-03 8:09 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] Add IO page table replacement support Tian, Kevin
2023-02-03 15:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-06 6:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-06 13:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-07 0:34 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+FSVoRpVguZUmW9@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).