From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.8bytes.org (mail.8bytes.org [85.214.250.239]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A567B for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 8bytes.org (p549ad5ad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.154.213.173]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBBCA222669; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:06:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1664193983; bh=WVitcPg/m0RCQapt+963hXu42ZEdMg6DpnM7zzVkG7Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mfs2aCFLhFgubexofJvVdFPUQ1goMDU5ZQQKmyqtHjeLT505bLm+bkKr6w5JB+rv5 dG9m8/sClA4WhKhUKm/A3Z4EfAW7zaReAIkCa314Sfsbrw1jrRoagebtELrlSRIC1U 2468lRBDfWpXrHgFLOscZOs4H88TCNv4rIb+/pEXYvLLf7yDMp3gMouvk+AMvwg5Mb ktLHqA97ir54KvwlIkvVLP/RPVb1p9J+lDOms+bz42nh44sqJotvF1Z+//HW+9eO3u baKuKx9BUXtlO6XWcXkzShlYNYrfF0kPGoB6NJVB3Yejf/5HOl3iU3lBuEzNVc7JE8 CIw2HVCukJMgQ== Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:06:21 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Will Deacon Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker , robin.murphy@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iommu: arm,smmu-v3: Relax order of interrupt names Message-ID: References: <20220916133145.1910549-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20220922210855.GC12945@willie-the-truck> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220922210855.GC12945@willie-the-truck> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:08:56PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > Joerg -- please can you take this one directly for 6.1? I don't actually > have any other SMMU patches queued, so it doesn't seem worth sending a pull > request just for this. Applied, thanks.