iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
	sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.y.sun@intel.com,
	jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Attach/detach domains in auxiliary mode
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:49:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d714fb14-6217-f9c7-a5b2-2fc67e4bcd4c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105073408.21815-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

Hi Lu,

On 11/5/18 8:34 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> When multiple domains per device has been enabled by the
> device driver, the device will tag the default PASID for
> the domain to all DMA traffics out of the subset of this
> device; and the IOMMU should translate the DMA requests
> in PASID granularity.
> 
> This extends the intel_iommu_attach/detach_device() ops
> to support managing PASID granular translation structures
> when the device driver has enabled multiple domains per
> device.
> 
> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  10 ++
>  2 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 2c86ac71c774..a61b25ad0d3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -2477,6 +2477,7 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_one_dev_info(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>  	info->iommu = iommu;
>  	info->pasid_table = NULL;
>  	info->auxd_enabled = 0;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->auxiliary_domains);
>  
>  	if (dev && dev_is_pci(dev)) {
>  		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(info->dev);
> @@ -5010,35 +5011,134 @@ static void intel_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  	domain_exit(to_dmar_domain(domain));
>  }
>  
> -static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> -				     struct device *dev)
> +/*
> + * Check whether a @domain will be attached to the @dev in the
> + * auxiliary mode.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +is_device_attach_aux_domain(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  {
> -	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> -	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> -	int addr_width;
> -	u8 bus, devfn;
> +	struct device_domain_info *info = dev->archdata.iommu;
>  
> -	if (device_is_rmrr_locked(dev)) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "Device is ineligible for IOMMU domain attach due to platform RMRR requirement.  Contact your platform vendor.\n");
> -		return -EPERM;
> -	}
> +	return info && info->auxd_enabled &&
> +			domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED;
> +}
>  
> -	/* normally dev is not mapped */
> -	if (unlikely(domain_context_mapped(dev))) {
> -		struct dmar_domain *old_domain;
> +static void auxiliary_link_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> +				  struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info = dev->archdata.iommu;
>  
> -		old_domain = find_domain(dev);
> -		if (old_domain) {
> -			rcu_read_lock();
> -			dmar_remove_one_dev_info(old_domain, dev);
> -			rcu_read_unlock();
> +	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!info))
> +		return;
>  
> -			if (!domain_type_is_vm_or_si(old_domain) &&
> -			     list_empty(&old_domain->devices))
> -				domain_exit(old_domain);
> +	domain->auxd_refcnt++;
> +	list_add(&domain->auxd, &info->auxiliary_domains);
> +}
> +
> +static void auxiliary_unlink_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> +				    struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +
> +	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!info))
> +		return;
> +
> +	list_del(&domain->auxd);
> +	domain->auxd_refcnt--;
> +
> +	if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
> +		intel_pasid_free_id(domain->default_pasid);
> +}
> +
> +static int domain_add_dev_auxd(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> +			       struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u8 bus, devfn;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> +
> +	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
> +	if (!iommu)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> +	if (domain->default_pasid <= 0) {
> +		domain->default_pasid = intel_pasid_alloc_id(domain, PASID_MIN,
> +				pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		if (domain->default_pasid < 0) {
> +			pr_err("Can't allocate default pasid\n");
> +			ret = -ENODEV;
> +			goto pasid_failed;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
You may comment your nested lock policy somewhere.
> +	ret = domain_attach_iommu(domain, iommu);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto attach_failed;
> +
> +	/* Setup the PASID entry for mediated devices: */
> +	ret = intel_pasid_setup_second_level(iommu, domain, dev,
> +					     domain->default_pasid);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto table_failed;
> +	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> +	auxiliary_link_device(domain, dev);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +table_failed:
> +	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
> +attach_failed:
> +	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
> +		intel_pasid_free_id(domain->default_pasid);
> +pasid_failed:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void domain_remove_dev_aux(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> +				  struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	if (!is_device_attach_aux_domain(dev, &domain->domain))
> +		return;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> +	info = dev->archdata.iommu;
> +	iommu = info->iommu;
> +
> +	intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, domain->default_pasid);
> +
> +	auxiliary_unlink_device(domain, dev);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
> +	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int __intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				       struct device *dev)
> +{
Maybe introducing __intel_iommu_attach_device in a patch prior to that
one would help the review.
> +	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> +	int addr_width;
> +	u8 bus, devfn;
> +
>  	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
>  	if (!iommu)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -5071,7 +5171,47 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  		dmar_domain->agaw--;
>  	}
>  
> -	return domain_add_dev_info(dmar_domain, dev);
> +	if (is_device_attach_aux_domain(dev, domain))
> +		return domain_add_dev_auxd(dmar_domain, dev);
why not putting this directly  into intel_iommu_attach_device_aux()?
> +	else
> +		return domain_add_dev_info(dmar_domain, dev);
and this into intel_iommu_attach_device() as
__intel_iommu_attach_device() is the common part now?
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +				     struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (device_is_rmrr_locked(dev)) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Device is ineligible for IOMMU domain attach due to platform RMRR requirement.  Contact your platform vendor.\n");
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	}
shouldn't we test this in the common part (ie. in
__intel_iommu_attach_device). Don't RMRR also impact aux domains ?
> +
> +	if (is_device_attach_aux_domain(dev, domain))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	/* normally dev is not mapped */
> +	if (unlikely(domain_context_mapped(dev))) {
> +		struct dmar_domain *old_domain;
> +
> +		old_domain = find_domain(dev);
> +		if (old_domain) {
> +			rcu_read_lock();
> +			dmar_remove_one_dev_info(old_domain, dev);
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +			if (!domain_type_is_vm_or_si(old_domain) &&
> +			    list_empty(&old_domain->devices))
> +				domain_exit(old_domain);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return __intel_iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_iommu_attach_device_aux(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					 struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return is_device_attach_aux_domain(dev, domain) ?
> +			__intel_iommu_attach_device(domain, dev) : -EPERM;
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> @@ -5080,6 +5220,12 @@ static void intel_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	dmar_remove_one_dev_info(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_iommu_detach_device_aux(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> +					  struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	domain_remove_dev_aux(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);
> +}
> +
>  static int intel_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  			   unsigned long iova, phys_addr_t hpa,
>  			   size_t size, int iommu_prot)
> @@ -5436,6 +5582,8 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
>  	.domain_free		= intel_iommu_domain_free,
>  	.attach_dev		= intel_iommu_attach_device,
>  	.detach_dev		= intel_iommu_detach_device,
> +	.attach_dev_aux		= intel_iommu_attach_device_aux,
> +	.detach_dev_aux		= intel_iommu_detach_device_aux,
>  	.map			= intel_iommu_map,
>  	.unmap			= intel_iommu_unmap,
>  	.iova_to_phys		= intel_iommu_iova_to_phys,
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index 6b198e13e75e..678c7fb05e74 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -473,9 +473,11 @@ struct dmar_domain {
>  					/* Domain ids per IOMMU. Use u16 since
>  					 * domain ids are 16 bit wide according
>  					 * to VT-d spec, section 9.3 */
> +	unsigned int	auxd_refcnt;	/* Refcount of auxiliary attaching */
>  
>  	bool has_iotlb_device;
>  	struct list_head devices;	/* all devices' list */
> +	struct list_head auxd;		/* link to device's auxiliary list */
>  	struct iova_domain iovad;	/* iova's that belong to this domain */
>  
>  	struct dma_pte	*pgd;		/* virtual address */
> @@ -494,6 +496,11 @@ struct dmar_domain {
>  					   2 == 1GiB, 3 == 512GiB, 4 == 1TiB */
>  	u64		max_addr;	/* maximum mapped address */
>  
> +	int		default_pasid;	/*
> +					 * The default pasid used for non-SVM
> +					 * traffic on mediated devices.
> +					 */
> +
>  	struct iommu_domain domain;	/* generic domain data structure for
>  					   iommu core */
>  };
> @@ -543,6 +550,9 @@ struct device_domain_info {
>  	struct list_head link;	/* link to domain siblings */
>  	struct list_head global; /* link to global list */
>  	struct list_head table;	/* link to pasid table */
> +	struct list_head auxiliary_domains; /* auxiliary domains
> +					     * attached to this device
> +					     */
>  	u8 bus;			/* PCI bus number */
>  	u8 devfn;		/* PCI devfn number */
>  	u16 pfsid;		/* SRIOV physical function source ID */
> 
Thanks

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-23 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05  7:34 [PATCH v4 0/8] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device Lu Baolu
     [not found] ` <20181105073408.21815-1-baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-05  7:34   ` [PATCH v4 1/8] iommu: Add APIs for multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-11-23 10:50     ` Auger Eric
     [not found]       ` <51871885-05d2-febc-1dba-4d74108d0f46-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-26  2:04         ` Lu Baolu
2018-12-04  3:46   ` [PATCH v4 0/8] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device Xu Zaibo
     [not found]     ` <5C05F87D.4050206-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-12-04  6:20       ` Lu Baolu
2018-12-04  6:50         ` Xu Zaibo
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] iommu/vt-d: Add multiple domains per device query Lu Baolu
     [not found]   ` <20181105073408.21815-3-baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-23 10:49     ` Auger Eric
2018-11-26  2:10       ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Enable/disable multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Attach/detach domains in auxiliary mode Lu Baolu
2018-11-23 10:49   ` Auger Eric [this message]
     [not found]     ` <d714fb14-6217-f9c7-a5b2-2fc67e4bcd4c-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-26  2:37       ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] iommu/vt-d: Return ID associated with an auxiliary domain Lu Baolu
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] vfio/mdev: Add iommu place holders in mdev_device Lu Baolu
     [not found]   ` <20181105073408.21815-7-baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-05 14:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-05 23:33       ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-06 23:53     ` Alex Williamson
2018-11-07  1:48       ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-15 21:31         ` Kirti Wankhede
2018-11-16  1:20           ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-16  8:57             ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-17  2:37               ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-20 20:52               ` Kirti Wankhede
2018-11-21  8:45                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-03 16:27                   ` Kirti Wankhede
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] vfio/type1: Add domain at(de)taching group helpers Lu Baolu
     [not found]   ` <20181105073408.21815-8-baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-23 14:13     ` Auger Eric
     [not found]       ` <b5f5eda1-2dbf-dd7e-3b68-bfd9e5099c06-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-26  3:05         ` Lu Baolu
2018-11-05  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] vfio/type1: Handle different mdev isolation type Lu Baolu
     [not found]   ` <20181105073408.21815-9-baolu.lu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2018-11-23 14:23     ` Auger Eric
2018-11-26  3:09       ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d714fb14-6217-f9c7-a5b2-2fc67e4bcd4c@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).