From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BBAC2BB1D for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E848F2075E for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Zbtq2E+T" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E848F2075E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCA386BA4; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxAGdwWpaeu7; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0437486B18; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD584C089F; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B32C0177 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D19186BA4 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1Q+vgyssjCf for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B76F86B18 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586422901; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=msTkXhnouvwVtlF7/78TkiH9nVYNya7vCxTaw1gbKMk=; b=Zbtq2E+TUC/P1PltSqsr7owVqWxrb0qHhf1GWXOFi/owc9dD48yMUrR2tF7hdoC3AshfUa /GxJQzItDhveLzgAQX3oEh5lUCS8+HbJ1KdYObk5DZV5PI0t5S65RpzRCUjdPRPLjvwGPx o6FZfQkVqk0PnlqaJhmPu0/KgaHXvYM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-20-4d7R36GENiiwKgaxvAcgYQ-1; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 05:01:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4d7R36GENiiwKgaxvAcgYQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88F18107ACCA; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.115.53] (ovpn-115-53.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.53]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8122AA63D6; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] vfio/type1: Report 1st-level/stage-1 format to userspace To: Jean-Philippe Brucker References: <1584880325-10561-1-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <1584880325-10561-6-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <20200403082305.GA1269501@myrica> <20200409081442.GD2435@myrica> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 11:01:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200409081442.GD2435@myrica> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , "Raj, Ashok" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "Sun, Yi Y" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "Tian, Jun J" , "Wu, Hao" X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" Hi Jean, On 4/9/20 10:14 AM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 12:27:58PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote: >> Hi Yi, >> >> On 4/7/20 11:43 AM, Liu, Yi L wrote: >>> Hi Jean, >>> >>>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker >>>> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 4:23 PM >>>> To: Auger Eric >>>> userspace >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:01:12PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote: >>>>>>>> header = vfio_info_cap_add(caps, sizeof(*nesting_cap), >>>>>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING, 1); >>>> @@ -2254,6 +2309,7 >>>>>>>> @@ static int vfio_iommu_info_add_nesting_cap(struct >>>>>>> vfio_iommu *iommu, >>>>>>>> /* nesting iommu type supports PASID requests (alloc/free) */ >>>>>>>> nesting_cap->nesting_capabilities |= VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQS; >>>>>>> What is the meaning for ARM? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it's just a software capability exposed to userspace, on >>>>>> userspace side, it has a choice to use it or not. :-) The reason >>>>>> define it and report it in cap nesting is that I'd like to make the >>>>>> pasid alloc/free be available just for IOMMU with type >>>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_NESTING. Please feel free tell me if it is not good >>>>>> for ARM. We can find a proper way to report the availability. >>>>> >>>>> Well it is more a question for jean-Philippe. Do we have a system wide >>>>> PASID allocation on ARM? >>>> >>>> We don't, the PASID spaces are per-VM on Arm, so this function should consult the >>>> IOMMU driver before setting flags. As you said on patch 3, nested doesn't >>>> necessarily imply PASID support. The SMMUv2 does not support PASID but does >>>> support nesting stages 1 and 2 for the IOVA space. >>>> SMMUv3 support of PASID depends on HW capabilities. So I think this needs to be >>>> finer grained: >>>> >>>> Does the container support: >>>> * VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST? >>>> -> Yes for VT-d 3 >>>> -> No for Arm SMMU >>>> * VFIO_IOMMU_{,UN}BIND_GUEST_PGTBL? >>>> -> Yes for VT-d 3 >>>> -> Sometimes for SMMUv2 >>>> -> No for SMMUv3 (if we go with BIND_PASID_TABLE, which is simpler due to >>>> PASID tables being in GPA space.) >>>> * VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_PASID_TABLE? >>>> -> No for VT-d >>>> -> Sometimes for SMMUv3 >>>> >>>> Any bind support implies VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE support. >>> >>> good summary. do you expect to see any >>> >>>> >>>>>>>> + nesting_cap->stage1_formats = formats; >>>>>>> as spotted by Kevin, since a single format is supported, rename >>>>>> >>>>>> ok, I was believing it may be possible on ARM or so. :-) will rename >>>>>> it. >>>> >>>> Yes I don't think an u32 is going to cut it for Arm :( We need to describe all sorts of >>>> capabilities for page and PASID tables (granules, GPA size, ASID/PASID size, HW >>>> access/dirty, etc etc.) Just saying "Arm stage-1 format" wouldn't mean much. I >>>> guess we could have a secondary vendor capability for these? >>> >>> Actually, I'm wondering if we can define some formats to stands for a set of >>> capabilities. e.g. VTD_STAGE1_FORMAT_V1 which may indicates the 1st level >>> page table related caps (aw, a/d, SRE, EA and etc.). And vIOMMU can parse >>> the capabilities. >> >> But eventually do we really need all those capability getters? I mean >> can't we simply rely on the actual call to VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_GUEST_PGTBL() >> to detect any mismatch? Definitively the error handling may be heavier >> on userspace but can't we manage. > > I think we need to present these capabilities at boot time, long before > the guest triggers a bind(). For example if the host SMMU doesn't support > 16-bit ASID, we need to communicate that to the guest using vSMMU ID > registers or PROBE properties. Otherwise a bind() will succeed, but if the > guest uses 16-bit ASIDs in its CD, DMA will result in C_BAD_CD events > which we'll inject into the guest, for no apparent reason from their > perspective. OK I understand this case as in this situation we may be able to change the way to iommu is exposed to the guest. > > In addition some VMMs may have fallbacks if shared page tables are not > available. They could fall back to a MAP/UNMAP interface, or simply not > present a vIOMMU to the guest. fair enough, there is a need for such capability checker in the mid term. But this patch introduces the capability to check whether system wide PASID alloc is supported and this may not be requested at that stage for the whole vSVM integration? Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Jean > >> My fear is we end up with an overly >> complex series. This capability getter may be interesting if we can >> switch to a fallback implementation but here I guess we don't have any >> fallback. With smmuv3 nested stage we don't have any fallback solution >> either. For the versions, it is different because the userspace shall be >> able to adapt (or not) to the max version supported by the kernel. >> >> Thanks >> >> Eric >>> >>> Regards, >>> Yi Liu >>> >> > _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu