linux-kbuild.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, bp@amd64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:24:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110228182440.GA12411@a1.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110221110322.GA9819@liondog.tnic>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:03:22PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> Add a 'W=1' Makefile switch which adds additional checking per build
> object.
> 
> The idea behind this option is targeted at developers who, in the
> process of writing their code, want to do the occasional
> 
> make W=1 [target.o]
> 
> and let gcc do more extensive code checking for them. Then, they
> could eyeball the output for valid gcc warnings about various
> bugs/discrepancies which are not reported during the normal build
> process.
> 
> For more background information and a use case, read through this
> thread: http://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=129802065918147&w=2
> 
> -v4: Enable this for gcc only. Also, check for options which are not
> supported by every gcc version we use to build the kernel. Adding those
> checks for _every_ option slows down the build noticeably so be sensible
> here and add it only when your gcc version chokes on a particular
> option.
> 
> -v[2..3]: move to Makefile.build
> 
> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>

Ping?

Michal, Sam,

any news here? FWIW, I've been build-testing amd64_edac.c with it and
have caught a bunch of buglets with it. IMHO, it really helps to enable
more extensive gcc checking in debugging builds.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-28 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-21 11:03 [PATCH -v4] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks Borislav Petkov
2011-02-28 18:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-02-28 18:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-02-28 21:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-02-28 21:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-01 11:35     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-01 13:20       ` Américo Wang
2011-03-01 14:56         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110228182440.GA12411@a1.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).