From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56726 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731039AbgGAPFV (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:05:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 17:05:12 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] add support for Clang LTO Message-ID: <20200701150512.GH4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200625080313.GY4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200625082433.GC117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200625085745.GD117543@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200630191931.GA884155@elver.google.com> <20200630201243.GD4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200630203016.GI9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200701114027.GO4800@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200701140654.GL9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200701140654.GL9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Marco Elver , Nick Desaulniers , Sami Tolvanen , Masahiro Yamada , Will Deacon , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kees Cook , clang-built-linux , Kernel Hardening , linux-arch , Linux ARM , Linux Kbuild mailing list , LKML , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 07:06:54AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > The current state in the C++ committee is that marking variables > carrying dependencies is the way forward. This is of course not what > the Linux kernel community does, but it should not be hard to have a > -fall-variables-dependent or some such that causes all variables to be > treated as if they were marked. Though I was hoping for only pointers. > Are they -sure- that they -absolutely- need to carry dependencies > through integers??? What's 'need'? :-) I'm thinking __ktime_get_fast_ns() is better off with a dependent load than it is with an extra smp_rmb(). Yes we can stick an smp_rmb() in there, but I don't like it. Like I wrote earlier, if I wanted a control dependency, I'd have written one.