archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <>,
	Nathan Chancellor <>,
	Nick Desaulniers <>,
	Nicolas Schier <>, Shuah Khan <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] selftests/nolibc: avoid spurious kernel relinks
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 05:22:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 09:13:26AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Currently the nolibc testsuite embeds the test executable into a kernel
> This forces a full kernel relink everytime the test executable is
> updated.
> This relinking step dominates the test cycle.
> It is slower than building and running the test in qemu together.
> With a bit of Makefile-shuffling the relinking can be avoided.

That's pretty nice as indeed it still takes a while to relink it into
the kernel. I agree that for running nolibc-test in qemu we don't need
a unified image. However I've seldom used it on real hardware and I
find it significantly more convenient to use as a single image in this
case. Maybe we should just rename targets so that everything qemu-related
just uses two distinct images while a "unified-image" (or anything else)
still assembles the image into the kernel (BTW the help on the "kernel"
target still mentions initramfs).

Note that we don't need to modify anything in the build system to create
an initrd, I usually make them by hand using "cpio -o -H newc", we don't
need anything else here.

Regarding rerun, I'd rather keep it for the sole reason that I've used
it to check for randomly failing errors (typically the timing-based
ones). It's convenient to run the same image 100 times if needed. I'm
not strongly attached to it, but if "make run" is slower, then we can
keep it. However if you really want to drop it, it also needs to be
dropped from the help message ;-)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-17  3:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-16  7:13 [PATCH RFC 0/3] selftests/nolibc: avoid spurious kernel relinks Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-16  7:13 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] kbuild: add toplevel target for usr/gen_init_cpio Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-16 15:54   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-09-16  7:13 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] selftests/nolibc: don't embed initramfs into kernel image Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-16  7:13 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] selftests/nolibc: drop target "rerun" Thomas Weißschuh
2023-09-17  3:22 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-09-17 14:44   ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] selftests/nolibc: avoid spurious kernel relinks Thomas Weißschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).