From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hverkuil@xs4all.nl (Hans Verkuil) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:20:24 +0200 Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement In-Reply-To: <20190924141752.5508-2-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com> References: <20190924141752.5508-1-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com> <20190924141752.5508-2-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com> Message-ID: <373a02cd-bb48-3f10-45a7-6b318889715c@xs4all.nl> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190924152024.RuDdmpqAs2br63ZCfG3rmROJgbwopBqH7p64vpycYJg@z> On 9/24/19 4:17 PM, Jiunn Chang wrote: > Tuner step increment/decrement will select the next highest or next > lowest service frequency. There are a total of three possible > frequencies from analog_freqs_khz given a broadcast type and system. > > Opcodes implemented: > - > - > > Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang > --- > utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp > index acc3fd00..adb2f63c 100644 > --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp > +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp > @@ -135,6 +135,22 @@ static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg) > return false; > } > > +static int analog_find_freq_index(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info) > +{ > + if (info->analog.ana_freq == 0) > + return -1; Can this ever be 0? With the current emulation code this cannot happen, I think. I'd drop this check. > + > + int ana_freq_khz = (info->analog.ana_freq * 625) / 10; > + > + for (int i = 0; i < NUM_ANALOG_FREQS; i++) { > + int freq = analog_freqs_khz[info->analog.ana_bcast_type][info->analog.bcast_system][i]; > + > + if (ana_freq_khz == freq) > + return i; > + } > + return -1; If it can't be found, just return 0. Again, this can't happen with the current code. > +} > + > void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, unsigned me) > { > bool is_bcast = cec_msg_is_broadcast(&msg); > @@ -178,12 +194,39 @@ void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, uns > return; > > case CEC_MSG_SELECT_DIGITAL_SERVICE: > - case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT: > - case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT: > - if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me)) > + case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT: { > + if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me)) > break; > + > + struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &node->state.tuner_dev_info; > + int idx = analog_find_freq_index(info); > + > + if (idx == -1 || idx == 0) If idx == 0, then just wrap around to the highest index. That's what typically happens when you press Previous Channel on the TV's remote as well. > + return; > + if (info->is_analog) { > + int freq = analog_freqs_khz[info->analog.ana_bcast_type][info->analog.bcast_system][--idx]; > + > + info->analog.ana_freq = (freq * 10) / 625; > + } > return; > + } > + > + case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT: { > + if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me)) > + break; > > + struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &node->state.tuner_dev_info; > + int idx = analog_find_freq_index(info); > + > + if (idx == -1 || idx == 2) Same here, just wrap around to 0. And don't use 2, use the NUM_ANALOG_FREQS define. > + return; > + if (info->is_analog) { > + int freq = analog_freqs_khz[info->analog.ana_bcast_type][info->analog.bcast_system][++idx]; > + > + info->analog.ana_freq = (freq * 10) / 625; > + } > + return; > + } > > /* > One Touch Record > Regards, Hans