Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 01/12] fbdev: gxfb: use generic power management

[Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 03:09:48PM +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 01:17:46PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > Hi Vaibhav
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:37:11PM +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> > > > Drivers using legacy power management .suspen()/.resume() callbacks
> > > > have to manage PCI states and device's PM states themselves. They also
> > > > need to take care of standard configuration registers.
> > > > 
> > > > Switch to generic power management framework using a single
> > > > "struct dev_pm_ops" variable
> > > 
> > > "to take the unnecessary load from the driver."
> > > - I do not parse the above - I cannot see what load is removed.
> > > But the code is simpler which is fine. The drawback is that we now
> > > always link in the suspend_gx functions but hopefultl the linker drops
> > > them later.
> > > 
> > > > This also avoids the need for the driver to directly call most of the PCI
> > > > helper functions and device power state control functions, as through
> > > > the generic framework PCI Core takes care of the necessary operations,
> > > > and drivers are required to do only device-specific jobs.
> > > Again, I do not see what calles are removed.
> > > A single check for the state is dropped - anything else?
> > >
> > Yeah, the commit messages are bit misleading, I have modified them. 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb.h       |  5 ----
> > > >  drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c  | 36 ++++++++++++++------------
> > > >  drivers/video/fbdev/geode/suspend_gx.c |  4 ---
> > > >  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb.h b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb.h
> > > > index d2e9c5c8e294..792c111c21e4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb.h
> > > > @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ struct gxfb_par {
> > > >  	void __iomem *dc_regs;
> > > >  	void __iomem *vid_regs;
> > > >  	void __iomem *gp_regs;
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > >  	int powered_down;
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* register state, for power management functionality */
> > > > @@ -36,7 +35,6 @@ struct gxfb_par {
> > > >  	uint64_t fp[FP_REG_COUNT];
> > > >  
> > > >  	uint32_t pal[DC_PAL_COUNT];
> > > > -#endif
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  unsigned int gx_frame_buffer_size(void);
> > > > @@ -49,11 +47,8 @@ void gx_set_dclk_frequency(struct fb_info *info);
> > > >  void gx_configure_display(struct fb_info *info);
> > > >  int gx_blank_display(struct fb_info *info, int blank_mode);
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > >  int gx_powerdown(struct fb_info *info);
> > > >  int gx_powerup(struct fb_info *info);
> > > > -#endif
> > > > -
> > > >  
> > > >  /* Graphics Processor registers (table 6-23 from the data book) */
> > > >  enum gp_registers {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
> > > > index d38a148d4746..44089b331f91 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
> > > > @@ -322,17 +322,14 @@ static struct fb_info *gxfb_init_fbinfo(struct device *dev)
> > > >  	return info;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > > -static int gxfb_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > > > +static int __maybe_unused gxfb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > >  {
> > > > -	struct fb_info *info = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > +	struct fb_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > I do not see any dev_set_drvdata() so I guess we get a NULL pointer
> > > here which is not intended.
> > > Adding a dev_set_data() to gxfb_probe() would do the trick.
> > > 
> > gxfb_probe() invokes pci_set_drvdata(pdev, info) which in turn calls
> > dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, data). Adding dev_get_drvdata() will be redundant.
> OK, not obvious but you are right that calling dev_get_drvdata() would
> be redundant and no need.
> There is a pci_get_drvdata() user left so we cannot just skip it and use
> the dev_set_drvdata() direct.
> 
> > 
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (state.event == PM_EVENT_SUSPEND) {
> > > > -		console_lock();
> > > > -		gx_powerdown(info);
> > > > -		fb_set_suspend(info, 1);
> > > > -		console_unlock();
> > > > -	}
> > > > +	console_lock();
> > > > +	gx_powerdown(info);
> > > > +	fb_set_suspend(info, 1);
> > > > +	console_unlock();
> > > >  
> > > >  	/* there's no point in setting PCI states; we emulate PCI, so
> > > >  	 * we don't end up getting power savings anyways */
> > > > @@ -340,9 +337,9 @@ static int gxfb_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > -static int gxfb_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > +static int __maybe_unused gxfb_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > >  {
> > > > -	struct fb_info *info = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > +	struct fb_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >  
> > > >  	console_lock();
> > > > @@ -356,7 +353,6 @@ static int gxfb_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > >  	console_unlock();
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > > -#endif
> > > >  
> > > >  static int gxfb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > >  {
> > > > @@ -467,15 +463,23 @@ static const struct pci_device_id gxfb_id_table[] = {
> > > >  
> > > >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, gxfb_id_table);
> > > >  
> > > > +static const struct dev_pm_ops gxfb_pm_ops = {
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > > +	.suspend	= gxfb_suspend,
> > > > +	.resume		= gxfb_resume,
> > > > +	.freeze		= NULL,
> > > > +	.thaw		= gxfb_resume,
> > > > +	.poweroff	= NULL,
> > > > +	.restore	= gxfb_resume,
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +};
> > > Can we use SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS here?
> > > .freeze will be assigned gxfb_suspend, but gxfb_suspend will anyway be
> > > called as far as I read the code.
> > > Likewise for poweroff.
> > > 
> > Earlier, gxfb_suspend() performed each operation just for suspend event.
> > And as it was legacy code, it was invoked by pci_legacy_suspend() for
> > pci_pm_suspend(), pci_pm_freeze() and pci_pm_poweroff().
> > Thus, the code was wrapped inside "if" container:
> > 	if (state.event == PM_EVENT_SUSPEND) { }
> > 
> > After binding it with dev_pm_ops variable, pm->suspend() is invoked by just
> > pci_pm_suspend() which is required.
> > 
> > So I removed the "if" container and bind the callback with pm->suspend pointer
> > only.
> Looking at platform.c I got the impression that freeze() would call
> pci_legacy_suspend() anyway - but I may have missind something.
> So I guess this is OK then.
> 
> I look forward for next revision with updated changelogs.
Hello Sam,

Yeah, I have updated the logs, will be sending the v2 soon. :)

Thanks
Vaibhav Gupta
> 
> 	Sam
> > 
> > Using SET_SYSTEM_PM_OPS will bring back the extra step of invoking gxfb_suspend()
> > for freeze and poweroff, even though the function will do nothing in that case.
> > 
> > Vaibhav Gupta
> > > 	Sam
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > >  static struct pci_driver gxfb_driver = {
> > > >  	.name		= "gxfb",
> > > >  	.id_table	= gxfb_id_table,
> > > >  	.probe		= gxfb_probe,
> > > >  	.remove		= gxfb_remove,
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > > -	.suspend	= gxfb_suspend,
> > > > -	.resume		= gxfb_resume,
> > > > -#endif
> > > > +	.driver.pm	= &gxfb_pm_ops,
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > >  #ifndef MODULE
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/suspend_gx.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/suspend_gx.c
> > > > index 1110a527c35c..8c49d4e98772 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/suspend_gx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/suspend_gx.c
> > > > @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
> > > >  
> > > >  #include "gxfb.h"
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > > -
> > > >  static void gx_save_regs(struct gxfb_par *par)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	int i;
> > > > @@ -259,5 +257,3 @@ int gx_powerup(struct fb_info *info)
> > > >  	par->powered_down  = 0;
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > > -
> > > > -#endif
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.27.0
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees