linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 06/23] PCI: Replace aspm_register_info.l1ss_cap* with their pci_dev version
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:03:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200822200358.252967-7-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200822200358.252967-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>

Replace all references to aspm_register_info.(l1ss_cap | l1ss_cap_ptr) with
pci_dev.(l1ss_cap | l1ss_cap_ptr)

Signed-off-by: Saheed O. Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index d622affdbbcc..0657cad5f290 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -501,32 +501,34 @@ static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
 {
 	u32 val1, val2, scale1, scale2;
 	u32 t_common_mode, t_power_on, l1_2_threshold, scale, value;
+	struct pci_dev *dw_pdev = link->downstream;
+	struct pci_dev *up_pdev = link->pdev;
 
-	link->l1ss.up_cap_ptr = upreg->l1ss_cap_ptr;
-	link->l1ss.dw_cap_ptr = dwreg->l1ss_cap_ptr;
+	link->l1ss.up_cap_ptr = up_pdev->l1ss_cap_ptr;
+	link->l1ss.dw_cap_ptr = dw_pdev->l1ss_cap_ptr;
 	link->l1ss.ctl1 = link->l1ss.ctl2 = 0;
 
 	if (!(link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK))
 		return;
 
 	/* Choose the greater of the two Port Common_Mode_Restore_Times */
-	val1 = (upreg->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_CM_RESTORE_TIME) >> 8;
-	val2 = (dwreg->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_CM_RESTORE_TIME) >> 8;
+	val1 = (up_pdev->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_CM_RESTORE_TIME) >> 8;
+	val2 = (dw_pdev->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_CM_RESTORE_TIME) >> 8;
 	t_common_mode = max(val1, val2);
 
 	/* Choose the greater of the two Port T_POWER_ON times */
-	val1   = (upreg->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_VALUE) >> 19;
-	scale1 = (upreg->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_SCALE) >> 16;
-	val2   = (dwreg->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_VALUE) >> 19;
-	scale2 = (dwreg->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_SCALE) >> 16;
+	val1   = (up_pdev->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_VALUE) >> 19;
+	scale1 = (up_pdev->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_SCALE) >> 16;
+	val2   = (dw_pdev->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_VALUE) >> 19;
+	scale2 = (dw_pdev->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_P_PWR_ON_SCALE) >> 16;
 
-	if (calc_l1ss_pwron(link->pdev, scale1, val1) >
-	    calc_l1ss_pwron(link->downstream, scale2, val2)) {
+	if (calc_l1ss_pwron(up_pdev, scale1, val1) >
+	    calc_l1ss_pwron(dw_pdev, scale2, val2)) {
 		link->l1ss.ctl2 |= scale1 | (val1 << 3);
-		t_power_on = calc_l1ss_pwron(link->pdev, scale1, val1);
+		t_power_on = calc_l1ss_pwron(up_pdev, scale1, val1);
 	} else {
 		link->l1ss.ctl2 |= scale2 | (val2 << 3);
-		t_power_on = calc_l1ss_pwron(link->downstream, scale2, val2);
+		t_power_on = calc_l1ss_pwron(dw_pdev, scale2, val2);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -615,13 +617,13 @@ static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
 	link->latency_dw.l1 = calc_l1_latency(child);
 
 	/* Setup L1 substate */
-	if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_ASPM_L1_1)
+	if (parent->l1ss_cap & child->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_ASPM_L1_1)
 		link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1;
-	if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_ASPM_L1_2)
+	if (parent->l1ss_cap & child->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_ASPM_L1_2)
 		link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2;
-	if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_PCIPM_L1_1)
+	if (parent->l1ss_cap & child->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_PCIPM_L1_1)
 		link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM;
-	if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_PCIPM_L1_2)
+	if (parent->l1ss_cap & child->l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_PCIPM_L1_2)
 		link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM;
 
 	if (up_l1ss_ctl1 & dw_l1ss_ctl1 & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_ASPM_L1_1)
-- 
2.18.4

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-22 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-22 20:03 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 00/23] Remove struct pcie_link_state and aspm_register_info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 01/23] PCI: Migrate ASPM info from struct pcie_link_state to struct pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 02/23] PCI: Add l1ss_cap and l1ss_cap_ptr " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 03/23] PCI: Rework calc_l*_latency() to take a pci_dev * Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 04/23] PCI: Compute aspm_register_info.support directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 05/23] PCI: Read value of aspm_register_info.l1ss_ctl1 directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 07/23] PCI: Compute aspm_register_info.enable directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 08/23] PCI: Remove unused aspm_calc_l1ss_info() arguments Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 09/23] PCI: Remove pcie_get_aspm_reg() and struct aspm_register_info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 10/23] PCI: Relocate call to aspm_calc_l1ss_info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 11/23] PCI: Rework and Rename aspm_calc_l1ss_info() Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 12/23] PCI: Add ASPM and CLOCK PM states to struct pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 13/23] PCI: Initialise and Update values of pci_dev's PCIe link info Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 14/23] PCI: Change Return and Argument values from pcie_link_state to pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 15/23] PCI: Replace pcie_link_state based device list with a pci_dev one Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 16/23] PCI: Remove Exit latencies from struct pcie_link_state Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 17/23] PCI: Remove .clkpm_* " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 18/23] PCI: Remove .aspm_* " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 19/23] PCI: Remove .parent " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 20/23] PCI: Remove .root " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 21/23] PCI: Remove .downstream " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 22/23] PCI: Remove .pdev " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-22 20:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH v5 23/23] PCI: Remove " Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200822200358.252967-7-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).