From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA10C433DF for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 905092075D for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ialw/PlE" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 905092075D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D8A26284; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nho9FXDALyu4; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CA323730; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D7FC088E; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1DAC0733 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7662C87513 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XMJ6UEfi7eVZ for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ej1-f68.google.com (mail-ej1-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEEF186FB6 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f68.google.com with SMTP id lx13so18355620ejb.4 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:12:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=wX50ijN1MvREDIsGS5xeUvOvHwSnksvK2NAsbuf3LdM=; b=ialw/PlEbuLKxjnilT/9gcUOn1JvXuhjogH2KPopW+8zGMTyzC4cccPQ2FhBzMhUA6 SNwjeU+EIfxwY/PQbyIFoyIJ9DrYSuGnVOG46YUkzjEVGP10RxniYxGtbY7KAyPLh8np 3ks1NrAHC9p2laTyrUpynDLUQ4C4srYgNq4XxjIbJAa+fCZN4Wv1ABG2lIMOdRae6RxN 6PynVm1ZogXPdCp2QG3tT+fIpL3Ev/0RATDhAdeszNZ4Qq4Vztyizti8cBNIONgkDW34 4l7YLA2wE1qvnxOe6QCLxDJ9gfiLdQa8XUjHs3zkY+qiN6g2AZSgKbJt32PMLYH5bhK0 1mDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=wX50ijN1MvREDIsGS5xeUvOvHwSnksvK2NAsbuf3LdM=; b=eYYT20CpIonNIs9Q7As/qOFFLAU1n5ept521QqI6gn4/XKqpeXKZQt/xRy3Iu/PPzn ZOCCpsz90WJSM2nJ9otYN6rUeyQYmj1BK3EaSqKRgGY3Urfr8PwQ+Jtp5ie+GkEMIdcX pMpxzP42+cph061zHYP2FrUj+fPeqAU6Z9QHlsUd1XifGOGGllW7J2hIspogt3ez0Lld V4/FAMnXMEpq8xOhlQ3Gyw3bM6RRGsEWMPFYr7LhqsYMf/1P48TVAUePFH/jD0SxjFtE I232SbgeFNFKnABBNvMZky+ZMsp6iISQ9EQVHF41QxN6F4pEW6qP2Ctn1bhLU7tSSBjE +VYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/WIqC5pykrJvOOkfO8UqMRHF6b7JervcNyJcA/+bHgMoy4qRE lBb2JoKsaebTBuBU9zJaD4I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/75L97OnteHurSRENk3PzKuEuZsidiUh+ImYU1G4fo56ylorIqQZv+42Mr706DdN0J+VEIA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:57c6:: with SMTP id u6mr945004ejr.194.1594663963454; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from net.saheed (54007186.dsl.pool.telekom.hu. [84.0.113.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm7364786ejw.114.2020.07.13.11.12.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:12:42 -0700 (PDT) To: Larry Finger , helgaas@kernel.org, Michael Buesch References: <20200713122247.10985-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> <20200713122247.10985-3-refactormyself@gmail.com> <70e57af0-6a8c-a893-67c9-0181af16ae2b@lwfinger.net> From: Saheed Bolarinwa Message-ID: <78b52ad5-015f-4452-0cd0-dbb2c8597672@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:13:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <70e57af0-6a8c-a893-67c9-0181af16ae2b@lwfinger.net> Content-Language: en-US Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH 02/35] ssb: Change PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL to 0 X-BeenThere: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-kernel-mentees-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Linux-kernel-mentees" Hello Larry, On 7/13/20 7:16 PM, Larry Finger wrote: > On 7/13/20 7:22 AM, Saheed O. Bolarinwa wrote: >> In reference to the PCI spec (Chapter 2), PCIBIOS* is an x86 concept. >> Their scope should be limited within arch/x86. >> >> Change all PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL to 0 >> >> Signed-off-by: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" > > Could you please tell me what difference this makes? It looks like > source churn rather than a substantive change. The symbol is defined > in pci.h and is used in many architures. Certainly, PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL > indicates success even more clearly than 0 does. > It is a trivial first step towards a probably significant task. I explained in the Cover Letter, I can see it didn't get through but I Cc linux-wireless (properly this time). Probably, too many addresses. I have resent it. It is here https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20200713185559.31967-1-refactormyself@gmail.com/T/#u > Why is your name inside quotes in your s-o-b? > To keep me company before I get to know my way within the kernel. I saw people with >2 names do it, so I did! Please let me know if it is odd. Thank you. - Saheed _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees